Thanks to Moderators

by **mpjh** on Sun Aug 10, 2008 7:32 pm

Just wanted to say that I know you all are just volunteers, and no one is getting rich from being a moderator. I can see that you have a tough job at times, and your sincere efforts are appreciated. Thank you.

by **whitestazn88** on Sun Aug 10, 2008 7:33 pm

really?

isn't that what your 25 dollars was for? i mean, yeah they're pretty good, but its not like everyone needs a thread....

by **baseballer72** on Sun Aug 10, 2008 7:37 pm

YEs this site is awesome THANKS

by **cpurcell** on Sun Aug 10, 2008 8:15 pm

I appreciate your involvement in keeping the site running, free of multi's, and basically just doing a pretty decent job of it! Keep up the good work

by **CrazyAnglican** on Sun Aug 10, 2008 8:17 pm

Aye, agreed. It can't be easy dealing with all the issues that come up, and I've had little problem at all in the time I've been here.

by **pimpdave** on Sun Aug 10, 2008 8:18 pm

Dear Moderators,

Your milkshake has brought me to the yard.

(Damn right, it's better than their's)

by **MeDeFe** on Sun Aug 10, 2008 11:04 pm

They can teach you, but they have to charge.

by **danodukebb** on Mon Aug 11, 2008 12:08 am

cpurcell wrote:I appreciate your involvement in keeping the site running, free of multi's, and basically just doing a pretty decent job of it! Keep up the good work

free of multies??? theres still plenty of multies here, but they DO do a good job with them I was talking to one earliar and "they" won't give any hints as to who didn't respond for a while and turns out "they" were found almost instantly

by **jiminski** on Mon Aug 11, 2008 3:53 pm

Good lord

by **wrestler1ump** on Mon Aug 11, 2008 7:36 pm

The moderating on this site falls fall short of decent. That is the truth.

by **Simon Viavant** on Mon Aug 11, 2008 7:39 pm

Yeah, thanks for keeping this site going. I wouldn't want to have to deal with some of the whiners here for any amount of money. (^^^^^)

by **Fircoal** on Mon Aug 11, 2008 7:43 pm

wrestler1ump wrote:The moderating on this site falls fall short of decent. That is the truth.

whump is right for once. :shock:

At least in some aspects it does.

by **wrestler1ump** on Mon Aug 11, 2008 7:59 pm

Simon Viavant wrote:Yeah, thanks for keeping this site going. I wouldn't want to have to deal with some of the whiners here for any amount of money. (^^^^^)

I don't want to have to deal with loud mouthed cooks. IGNORE.

by **Bruceswar** on Mon Aug 11, 2008 9:26 pm

Congrats to the multi hunters who put in countless hours of work to keep this sight somewhat multi free. Or as much as they can. Thanks for keeping this place civil!

by **Timminz** on Mon Aug 11, 2008 9:34 pm

wrestler1ump wrote:The moderating on this site falls fall short of decent. That is the truth.

You seem to be confused. You're mistaking an opinion for the truth. I would agree that, in some respects, I have found the moderation to be lacking, but to say that it "falls fall [sic] short of decent" would seem to indicate that you are completely dissatisfied with the site. If that were the case, you wouldn't still be here.

Thank you mods, for doing what you do. You guys put up with a whole lot more bullshit then I ever could. Without the work you do, this site would not be worth patronizing.

by **MeDeFe** on Tue Aug 12, 2008 12:26 am

Timminz wrote:
wrestler1ump wrote:The moderating on this site falls fall short of decent. That is the truth.

You seem to be confused. You're mistaking an opinion for the truth. I would agree that, in some respects, I have found the moderation to be lacking, but to say that it "falls fall [sic] short of decent" would seem to indicate that you are completely dissatisfied with the site. If that were the case, you wouldn't still be here.

Thank you mods, for doing what you do. You guys put up with a whole lot more bullshit then I ever could. Without the work you do, this site would not be worth patronizing.

Can we say that in many cases it barely qualifies as intelligible?