Conquer Club

Signal Jamming: a worthwhile strategy?

Talk about all things related to Conquer Club

Moderator: Community Team

Forum rules
Please read the community guidelines before posting.

Signal Jamming: a worthwhile strategy?

Postby Aesop Jones on Wed Aug 06, 2008 4:46 pm

So I'm playing in a Fog of War game, staring at a big bonus on a generally even playing field. The other four players are stockpiling behind their borders, as far as I can tell. I'm making the most armies of anyone by a large margin, but I've also got lots of borders to defend. So I'm thinking of ways to get people to leave me alone, though it might draw more attention to me.

With the Fog, you can see that X armies got deployed to ? and Y armies got deployed to ? and so forth. But if you place them one at a time, there's no clues whatsoever in the game log. There MIGHT be a giant stockpile somewhere, but there might just as well be me bulking up my entire area.

Is this a good way to cloak my movement - "signal jamming" seems to be the term for it - or will the huge chunk of text in the game log just spur everyone to murder me?
User avatar
Sergeant Aesop Jones
 
Posts: 219
Joined: Wed Aug 15, 2007 4:05 pm
Location: Washington DC

Re: Signal Jamming: a worthwhile strategy?

Postby BENJIKAT IS DEAD on Wed Aug 06, 2008 4:49 pm

I do this almost every turn in every fog game I play (which is the majority of my games) - never had anyone complain.

And yeah, sometimes every 1 goes on a different territory, and sometimes they all go in one place... most often it's a bit of both.
Image
User avatar
Colonel BENJIKAT IS DEAD
 
Posts: 775
Joined: Sun Jan 06, 2008 9:47 am
Location: Waterloo

Re: Signal Jamming: a worthwhile strategy?

Postby BaldAdonis on Wed Aug 06, 2008 4:52 pm

BENJIKAT IS DEAD wrote:I do this almost every turn in every fog game I play (which is the majority of my games) - never had anyone complain.

And yeah, sometimes every 1 goes on a different territory, and sometimes they all go in one place... most often it's a bit of both.


A couple times I've watched you play and seen 5 or more go on one place, one at a time. It's funny to imagine a person doing this on a real board!
User avatar
Captain BaldAdonis
 
Posts: 2334
Joined: Fri Aug 24, 2007 1:57 am
Location: Trapped in Pleasantville with Toby McGuire

Re: Signal Jamming: a worthwhile strategy?

Postby Incandenza on Wed Aug 06, 2008 4:53 pm

I'm with ben on this one. One of the major tricks to foggy games is to limit the amount of information the opponent(s) can glean about your activities. Deploying armies 1 or 2 at a time, even if they all go to the same terit, is just good strategy. Personally I always giggle a bit when I see "Player X deploys 9 armies to ?", because I know exactly what he did, more so than if he'd "signal-jammed" (a turn of phrase I quite like, actually).
THOTA: dingdingdingdingdingdingBOOM

Te Occidere Possunt Sed Te Edere Non Possunt Nefas Est
User avatar
Colonel Incandenza
 
Posts: 4949
Joined: Thu Oct 19, 2006 5:34 pm
Location: Playing Eschaton with a bucket of old tennis balls

Re: Signal Jamming: a worthwhile strategy?

Postby MostMackinest on Wed Aug 06, 2008 4:58 pm

i'll also do this with unlimited fortifying when i'm weak by moving the same armies back and forth from the same spots but always in different increments hoping that it appears i fortified heavily. if they're even watching, of course.
User avatar
Sergeant 1st Class MostMackinest
 
Posts: 166
Joined: Thu Jan 11, 2007 4:12 pm
Location: Seattle, Wa

Re: Signal Jamming: a worthwhile strategy?

Postby BENJIKAT IS DEAD on Wed Aug 06, 2008 5:01 pm

BaldAdonis wrote:
BENJIKAT IS DEAD wrote:I do this almost every turn in every fog game I play (which is the majority of my games) - never had anyone complain.

And yeah, sometimes every 1 goes on a different territory, and sometimes they all go in one place... most often it's a bit of both.


A couple times I've watched you play and seen 5 or more go on one place, one at a time. It's funny to imagine a person doing this on a real board!


5 or more - I remember doing over 30 once!

Incandenza wrote:I'm with ben on this one. One of the major tricks to foggy games is to limit the amount of information the opponent(s) can glean about your activities. Deploying armies 1 or 2 at a time, even if they all go to the same terit, is just good strategy. Personally I always giggle a bit when I see "Player X deploys 9 armies to ?", because I know exactly what he did, more so than if he'd "signal-jammed" (a turn of phrase I quite like, actually).


I occassionally wonder at how worthwhile it is, but then every few turns the "Player X deploys 9 armies to ?" means that I can figure out exactly what happened, and I remind myself to continue deploying 1s.

MostMackinest wrote:i'll also do this with unlimited fortifying when i'm weak by moving the same armies back and forth from the same spots but always in different increments hoping that it appears i fortified heavily. if they're even watching, of course.


I used to do this too, but so rarely play unlimited now that I haven't had the pleasure for quite some time.

BTW - I use Clickable Maps which makes it a WHOLE lot quicker.
Image
User avatar
Colonel BENJIKAT IS DEAD
 
Posts: 775
Joined: Sun Jan 06, 2008 9:47 am
Location: Waterloo

Re: Signal Jamming: a worthwhile strategy?

Postby Shatners Bassoon on Sun Aug 10, 2008 2:46 pm

MostMackinest wrote:i'll also do this with unlimited fortifying when i'm weak by moving the same armies back and forth from the same spots but always in different increments hoping that it appears i fortified heavily. if they're even watching, of course.



Yes,this is a tactic a enjoy too.
Image
31-29
User avatar
Major Shatners Bassoon
 
Posts: 651
Joined: Sat Nov 03, 2007 3:54 pm
Location: corner

Re: Signal Jamming: a worthwhile strategy?

Postby Commander Eric on Wed Aug 20, 2008 9:43 am

BaldAdonis wrote:
BENJIKAT IS DEAD wrote:I do this almost every turn in every fog game I play (which is the majority of my games) - never had anyone complain.

And yeah, sometimes every 1 goes on a different territory, and sometimes they all go in one place... most often it's a bit of both.


A couple times I've watched you play and seen 5 or more go on one place, one at a time. It's funny to imagine a person doing this on a real board!


Yessss isn't it funny though why they do that BaldAdonis, going to one place, [-X :^o and thinking they have a chance when you and your friends that set them up for the slaughter know your going to trash them in say about 5 moves after you jam their communications. It is easy to answer, the fright complex of gathering the herd and the survival complex of historyunderstoodcomplex, thinking you can attack the foe from a different area after they take out your strong points you took from them.

But BaldAdonis it always works out the same way for your friends and you when you and they sit in on a game, complete slaughter of the weaker newbees the thrill of the killing and the steamroll of the ideal male or female the perfect hunter killer human machines?
Private Commander Eric
 
Posts: 33
Joined: Thu Jul 31, 2008 10:26 pm

Re: Signal Jamming: a worthwhile strategy?

Postby Mr Changsha on Wed Aug 20, 2008 10:59 am

Commander Eric wrote:
BaldAdonis wrote:
BENJIKAT IS DEAD wrote:I do this almost every turn in every fog game I play (which is the majority of my games) - never had anyone complain.

And yeah, sometimes every 1 goes on a different territory, and sometimes they all go in one place... most often it's a bit of both.


A couple times I've watched you play and seen 5 or more go on one place, one at a time. It's funny to imagine a person doing this on a real board!


Yessss isn't it funny though why they do that BaldAdonis, going to one place, [-X :^o and thinking they have a chance when you and your friends that set them up for the slaughter know your going to trash them in say about 5 moves after you jam their communications. It is easy to answer, the fright complex of gathering the herd and the survival complex of historyunderstoodcomplex, thinking you can attack the foe from a different area after they take out your strong points you took from them.

But BaldAdonis it always works out the same way for your friends and you when you and they sit in on a game, complete slaughter of the weaker newbees the thrill of the killing and the steamroll of the ideal male or female the perfect hunter killer human machines?


You should be slaughtered in every game you play. You want to know why? Because the object of this game is to kill everyone else and the objective of everyone who plays it is (surprisingly I know) to kill everyone else. It might be easier for you to blame your loss on Newbie Killing, however let me hazard a guess that you pushed hard early, became a threat, and then got killed. If you're here in the strategy forum take the time to actually read some of these threads. A lot of them are useful, well-written and a genuine resource to new players and more experienced ones. Don't become one of those players who blames their losses on anything other than the fact that they deployed a shit strategy.
User avatar
Colonel Mr Changsha
 
Posts: 1662
Joined: Sat Mar 03, 2007 1:42 am

Re: Signal Jamming: a worthwhile strategy?

Postby XML7p on Fri Aug 29, 2008 3:45 am

Hes saying its not fair to slaughter newbies who have no experaince at this game while you have plenty of experaince at this game. If they join games which have lots newbies on purpose.
Cadet XML7p
 
Posts: 3
Joined: Wed Aug 06, 2008 3:08 pm

Re: Signal Jamming: a worthwhile strategy?

Postby jnd94 on Fri Aug 29, 2008 9:31 am

That is called noob farming, and it's frowned upon.
Captain jnd94
 
Posts: 7177
Joined: Sun Mar 11, 2007 4:22 pm


Return to Conquer Club Discussion

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users

cron