Moderators: Multi Hunters, Cheating/Abuse Team
hwhrhett wrote:i dont see any reason to think this person is a multi... is it because they are adept at strange game styles? because you should also note that one of this persons few posts was in the feudal war strategy thread, obviously they have been reading the tutorials....
is there something that im missing?
DarthBlood wrote:you'd think that someone who's been here for so long and has been around the C&A forum for this long would know how to fill out the correct form...
king sam wrote:DarthBlood wrote:you'd think that someone who's been here for so long and has been around the C&A forum for this long would know how to fill out the correct form...
or provide better evidence then hes better then me so he must be a multi.
This is why I wont even bother looking into his cases to help prove his theories
king sam wrote:See if you catch on to the trend
Codeblue accuses Jonotron with no evidence Jonotron Cleared
Codeblue accuses donny10 cause he plays to well Donny10 Cleared
Codeblue accuses StJColey cause hes too good StJCooley Cleared
Codeblue accuses Queen Gonorrhea cause shes got too good of a win percentage Queen Gonorrhea Cleared
DarthBlood wrote:can't even bother to properly link it. can't even bother to list game #s.
where exactly is your evidence? you said "King, are you always this dumb? Read my post, it has more than ample questions of his integrity." that's not proof. i look at your first post. basically, your "evidence" is "can't be anymore obvious".
codeblue1018 wrote:Shocker huh King? Apparently the evidence submitted was correct huh?
king sam wrote:codeblue1018 wrote:Shocker huh King? Apparently the evidence submitted was correct huh?
I guess a blind squirrel finds a nut every once in a while huh code?
Maybe next time you should try to point out the proof that suggests that a user is in violation of the rules.
Might help free up the hunters time to check the valid legitimate gripes and not just the vindictive ones that are "I got beat by a noob"
Good Job though buddy, way to go
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
king sam wrote:To be honest codeblue I wasnt trolling this or any C&A thread nor am I about to get sucked into this argument your trying to stir up.
My point was clear, and that was to make a claim that held weight behind it so that its not just wasting time checking into an accusation that was pointless when a hunter can be ruling on another case.
I have sent you a PM explaining what I am talking about, please check your inbox.
If it was perceived any other way then what I have written above then my apologies.
Regards,
KS
Users browsing this forum: No registered users