Um ok... calling Fox news biased and one sided reporting...a quote from this link is "What I think is fair to say about Fox -- and certainly it's the way we view it -- is that it really is more a wing of the Republican Party," Dunn said on CNN. "They take their talking points, put them on the air; take their opposition research, put them on the air. And that's fine. But let's not pretend they're a news network the way CNN is."
Are we serious here? LMAO what he just described is what CNN IS not fox...
http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2009/10 ... e-fox-news
SERIOUSLY?
Moderator: Community Team
Forum rules
Please read the Community Guidelines before posting.
Please read the Community Guidelines before posting.
- THORNHEART
- Posts: 369
- Joined: Wed Apr 11, 2007 3:47 pm
- Gender: Male
- Location: USA
- Contact:
SERIOUSLY?
Hello THORNHEART,
You have received a formal disciplinary warning.
THORNHEART has earned himself a 24 hour Forum ban..
1st user that hasn't taken the C&A Report Abuse / Spurious Reports Warning we give seriously.
You have received a formal disciplinary warning.
THORNHEART has earned himself a 24 hour Forum ban..
1st user that hasn't taken the C&A Report Abuse / Spurious Reports Warning we give seriously.
Re: SERIOUSLY?
THORNHEART wrote:CNN IS not fox
Excellent point.
- hecter
- Posts: 14632
- Joined: Tue Jan 09, 2007 6:27 pm
- Gender: Female
- Location: Tying somebody up on the third floor
- Contact:
Re: SERIOUSLY?
Timminz wrote:THORNHEART wrote:CNN IS not fox
Excellent point.
I think we can all agree on that.
In heaven... Everything is fine, in heaven... Everything is fine, in heaven... Everything is fine... You got your things, and I've got mine.


Re: SERIOUSLY?
Wut?
I'm sorry, your point was lost in the lack of supporting arguments and context.
I'm sorry, your point was lost in the lack of supporting arguments and context.
The inflation rate in Zimbabwe just hit 4 million percent. Some people say it is only 165,000, but they are just being stupid. -Scott Adams, artist and writer of Dilbert
Re: SERIOUSLY?
THORNHEART wrote:Um ok... calling Fox news biased and one sided reporting...a quote from this link is "What I think is fair to say about Fox -- and certainly it's the way we view it -- is that it really is more a wing of the Republican Party," Dunn said on CNN. "They take their talking points, put them on the air; take their opposition research, put them on the air. And that's fine. But let's not pretend they're a news network the way CNN is."
Are we serious here? LMAO what he just described is what CNN IS not fox...
http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2009/10 ... e-fox-news
Thank you, Rush Limbaugh.
...I prefer a man who will burn the flag and then wrap himself in the Constitution to a man who will burn the Constitution and then wrap himself in the flag.
- Johnny Rockets
- Posts: 568
- Joined: Sun May 13, 2007 9:58 pm
- Gender: Male
- Location: Winnipeg, Canada
- Contact:
Re: SERIOUSLY?
If you consider either of these sources as anything but biased tripe spewing retards then well......perhaps you should be picking up the Enquirer at the supermarket checkout to make sure that you have a triad of well informed media sources.
JRock
JRock
-
Army of GOD
- Posts: 7192
- Joined: Tue Feb 24, 2009 4:30 pm
- Gender: Male
-
spurgistan
- Posts: 1868
- Joined: Sat Oct 07, 2006 11:30 pm
Re: SERIOUSLY?
Hey, at least CNN busted the Balloon Boy story wide open. What moderately beneficial to the national interest has Faux done lately?
Mr_Adams wrote:You, sir, are an idiot.
Timminz wrote:By that logic, you eat babies.
- BigBallinStalin
- Posts: 5151
- Joined: Sun Oct 26, 2008 10:23 pm
- Location: crying into the dregs of an empty bottle of own-brand scotch on the toilet having a dump in Dagenham
- Contact:
Re: SERIOUSLY?
spurgistan wrote:Hey, at least CNN busted the Balloon Boy story wide open. What moderately beneficial to the national interest has Faux done lately?
Well they thoroughly helped the then administration in convincing many Americans that Iraq certainly has the capable to kill thousands of American citizens with their weapons of mass destruction.
Didn't MSNBC and CNN pretty much puke the same rhetoric as well? I can't recall clearly...