Moderator: Community Team
Pack Rat wrote:if it quacks like a duck and walk like a duck, it's still fascism
viewtopic.php?f=8&t=241668&start=200#p5349880
saxitoxin wrote:I think the WAC had the most innovative system a few years ago, pre-MWC, when they were using the 4-team, 4-quadrant arrangement, with the quadrants rotating division every two years.
I'd warrant, within 2-years, the PAC 10 invites Air Force. The only thing holding them back to now are the faculties at Berkeley, Washington, UCLA, Oregon and Stanford libbing it up and not wanting a service academy in there. Utah and CU should tip the balance of votes.
And, realistically, now that C-USA and the Mountain West have been raped of all their money teams, why not combine all these mid-majors into one giant, 50-team junk conference? Roll Mid-America, C-USA, WAC, Sun Belt and Mountain West all together.
muy_thaiguy wrote:Looks like BYU is trying to stab the MWC in the back by going Independent in football and WAC in all other sports. In return, the MWC has just extended invitations to Fresno State and UNR of the WAC (the last 2 "big dogs" of the WAC).
More to come most likely.
Optimist, if you're still around, what's your take on all this crap?
Here's one link on this.
http://sports.espn.go.com/ncaa/news/story?id=5474774
ViperOverLord wrote:Responding directly to what I think BYU should do: I think they should go independent. They can't compete for a national championship in the MWC. I think they are usually more of a 2nd tier contender most years. But for those years in which they have a really good team, they don't have to get screwed by the system. Having a stronger schedule makes them more valid and helps them to get recruits. The recruit part of the equation is especially significant. The 'major conferences' knew that by declaring themselves to be 'major conferences' and thereby receive more consideration, that they would perpetuate the recruiting gap.
muy_thaiguy wrote:Looks like BYU is trying to stab the MWC in the back by going Independent in football and WAC in all other sports. In return, the MWC has just extended invitations to Fresno State and UNR of the WAC (the last 2 "big dogs" of the WAC).
More to come most likely.
muy_thaiguy wrote:saxitoxin wrote:I think the WAC had the most innovative system a few years ago, pre-MWC, when they were using the 4-team, 4-quadrant arrangement, with the quadrants rotating division every two years.
I'd warrant, within 2-years, the PAC 10 invites Air Force. The only thing holding them back to now are the faculties at Berkeley, Washington, UCLA, Oregon and Stanford libbing it up and not wanting a service academy in there. Utah and CU should tip the balance of votes.
And, realistically, now that C-USA and the Mountain West have been raped of all their money teams, why not combine all these mid-majors into one giant, 50-team junk conference? Roll Mid-America, C-USA, WAC, Sun Belt and Mountain West all together.
The WAC 16 was one of the worst blunders in college football.
Pack Rat wrote:if it quacks like a duck and walk like a duck, it's still fascism
viewtopic.php?f=8&t=241668&start=200#p5349880
saxitoxin wrote:muy_thaiguy wrote:saxitoxin wrote:I think the WAC had the most innovative system a few years ago, pre-MWC, when they were using the 4-team, 4-quadrant arrangement, with the quadrants rotating division every two years.
I'd warrant, within 2-years, the PAC 10 invites Air Force. The only thing holding them back to now are the faculties at Berkeley, Washington, UCLA, Oregon and Stanford libbing it up and not wanting a service academy in there. Utah and CU should tip the balance of votes.
And, realistically, now that C-USA and the Mountain West have been raped of all their money teams, why not combine all these mid-majors into one giant, 50-team junk conference? Roll Mid-America, C-USA, WAC, Sun Belt and Mountain West all together.
The WAC 16 was one of the worst blunders in college football.
You're one of the worst blunders in college football, man!
muy_thaiguy wrote:saxitoxin wrote:muy_thaiguy wrote:saxitoxin wrote:I think the WAC had the most innovative system a few years ago, pre-MWC, when they were using the 4-team, 4-quadrant arrangement, with the quadrants rotating division every two years.
I'd warrant, within 2-years, the PAC 10 invites Air Force. The only thing holding them back to now are the faculties at Berkeley, Washington, UCLA, Oregon and Stanford libbing it up and not wanting a service academy in there. Utah and CU should tip the balance of votes.
And, realistically, now that C-USA and the Mountain West have been raped of all their money teams, why not combine all these mid-majors into one giant, 50-team junk conference? Roll Mid-America, C-USA, WAC, Sun Belt and Mountain West all together.
The WAC 16 was one of the worst blunders in college football.
You're one of the worst blunders in college football, man!
No, you are!
BTW, Wyoming has a freshman linebacker who just came here from Germany. Looks like he will be doing kick offs and be in the rotation for Middle Linebacker.
muy_thaiguy wrote:
BTW, Wyoming has a freshman linebacker who just came here from Germany. Looks like he will be doing kick offs and be in the rotation for Middle Linebacker.
muy_thaiguy wrote:Update-A new rumor going around is that C-USA and the MWC will be having a CCG of sorts, where the 2 conference champs play a game against eachother for a BCS Bowl Bid.
Pack Rat wrote:if it quacks like a duck and walk like a duck, it's still fascism
viewtopic.php?f=8&t=241668&start=200#p5349880
Users browsing this forum: mookiemcgee