Conquer Club

President John McCain

\\OFF-TOPIC// conversations about everything that has nothing to do with Conquer Club.

Moderator: Community Team

Forum rules
Please read the Community Guidelines before posting.

President John McCain

Postby alex951 on Tue Oct 19, 2010 7:23 pm

Were would the U.S. be if John McCain won the presidential election? would thing be different?

Image
User avatar
Private 1st Class alex951
 
Posts: 920
Joined: Thu Aug 28, 2008 1:00 pm

Re: President John McCain

Postby spurgistan on Tue Oct 19, 2010 7:48 pm

Bad. Yes.
Mr_Adams wrote:You, sir, are an idiot.


Timminz wrote:By that logic, you eat babies.
Sergeant spurgistan
 
Posts: 1868
Joined: Sat Oct 07, 2006 11:30 pm

Re: President John McCain

Postby ViperOverLord on Tue Oct 19, 2010 8:03 pm

Free market capitalism would not be as inhibited. Unemployment would probably be under 6.5 percent. The media would be doing their daily death counts for Aghanistan. The Democrats would be looking at gaining seats in The House, Senate and possibly the governorships. Sarah Palin would have taken her place as the next Dan Quayle, sufficiently smashed by the media and unable to run for the presidency. Barrack Obama would still be everyone's hero and he and the Clintons would be looking for ways to subtly denigrate each other as they prepare for runs in 2012. The liberal media would be going on about how a decade of Bush style politics are screwing us over. There would still be a budget deficit, but nowhere near what is now. Health care cost would not have went up 20 percent and we would have tort reform instead of socialized health care, excuse me 'the public option.' Bureaucracy and socialism would not be as rampant. Liberals would be feel like victims still. They would be calling blood for oil and the whole 9 yards and screaming more about corporatism run a muck.
User avatar
Captain ViperOverLord
 
Posts: 2485
Joined: Sun Apr 19, 2009 3:19 pm
Location: California

Re: President John McCain

Postby Army of GOD on Tue Oct 19, 2010 8:08 pm

ViperOverLord wrote:Free market capitalism would not be as inhibited. Unemployment would probably be under 6.5 percent. The media would be doing their daily death counts for Aghanistan. The Democrats would be looking at gaining seats in The House, Senate and possibly the governorships. Sarah Palin would have taken her place as the next Dan Quayle, sufficiently smashed by the media and unable to run for the presidency. Barrack Obama would still be everyone's hero and he and the Clintons would be looking for ways to subtly denigrate each other as they prepare for runs in 2012. The liberal media would be going on about how a decade of Bush style politics are screwing us over. There would still be a budget deficit, but nowhere near what is now. Health care cost would not have went up 20 percent and we would have tort reform instead of socialized health care, excuse me 'the public option.' Bureaucracy and socialism would not be as rampant. Liberals would be feel like victims still. They would be calling blood for oil and the whole 9 yards and screaming more about corporatism run a muck.


Darn! Too bad we didn't elect him then, huh?
mrswdk is a ho
User avatar
Lieutenant Army of GOD
 
Posts: 7191
Joined: Tue Feb 24, 2009 4:30 pm

Re: President John McCain

Postby Incandenza on Tue Oct 19, 2010 8:13 pm

ViperOverLord wrote:Free market capitalism would not be as inhibited. Unemployment would probably be under 6.5 percent. The media would be doing their daily death counts for Aghanistan. The Democrats would be looking at gaining seats in The House, Senate and possibly the governorships. Sarah Palin would have taken her place as the next Dan Quayle, sufficiently smashed by the media and unable to run for the presidency. Barrack Obama would still be everyone's hero and he and the Clintons would be looking for ways to subtly denigrate each other as they prepare for runs in 2012. The liberal media would be going on about how a decade of Bush style politics are screwing us over. There would still be a budget deficit, but nowhere near what is now. Health care cost would not have went up 20 percent and we would have tort reform instead of socialized health care, excuse me 'the public option.' Bureaucracy and socialism would not be as rampant. Liberals would be feel like victims still. They would be calling blood for oil and the whole 9 yards and screaming more about corporatism run a muck.


Image
THOTA: dingdingdingdingdingdingBOOM

Te Occidere Possunt Sed Te Edere Non Possunt Nefas Est
User avatar
Colonel Incandenza
 
Posts: 4949
Joined: Thu Oct 19, 2006 5:34 pm
Location: Playing Eschaton with a bucket of old tennis balls

Re: President John McCain

Postby Victor Sullivan on Tue Oct 19, 2010 8:19 pm

John McCain really needs to run in the 2012 election. I thought he got a bad rap, simply for being the same political party as Bush. He's pretty middle-of-the-road Republican and I think he would've gotten a lot more done than Obama has and he DEFINITELY wouldn't have supported that damned health care bill.
User avatar
Corporal Victor Sullivan
 
Posts: 6010
Joined: Mon Feb 08, 2010 8:17 pm
Location: Columbus, OH

Re: President John McCain

Postby Woodruff on Tue Oct 19, 2010 8:30 pm

Victor Sullivan wrote:John McCain really needs to run in the 2012 election. I thought he got a bad rap, simply for being the same political party as Bush. He's pretty middle-of-the-road Republican and I think he would've gotten a lot more done than Obama has and he DEFINITELY wouldn't have supported that damned health care bill.


John Fucking McCain can kiss my military ass. That bastard motherfucker votes on military issues like shit. f*ck him and his whole fucking bullshit hero-fucking-worship.

Not that I feel strongly about it or anything.
...I prefer a man who will burn the flag and then wrap himself in the Constitution to a man who will burn the Constitution and then wrap himself in the flag.
User avatar
Corporal 1st Class Woodruff
 
Posts: 5093
Joined: Sat Jan 05, 2008 9:15 am

Re: President John McCain

Postby ViperOverLord on Tue Oct 19, 2010 8:31 pm

Victor Sullivan wrote:John McCain really needs to run in the 2012 election. I thought he got a bad rap, simply for being the same political party as Bush. He's pretty middle-of-the-road Republican and I think he would've gotten a lot more done than Obama has and he DEFINITELY wouldn't have supported that damned health care bill.


The deck was stacked against him. The economy was bad and Bush approval polls were bad and he was painted as GWB III. He also had to deal with an electorate that wanted to vote for a guy simply because he was a black rock star making history while singing hope and change while the media produced the vids for him. Their records didn't mean shiz in that election. McCain had no chance. All of that said, I'm not rooting for McCain to run again.
User avatar
Captain ViperOverLord
 
Posts: 2485
Joined: Sun Apr 19, 2009 3:19 pm
Location: California

Re: President John McCain

Postby Woodruff on Tue Oct 19, 2010 8:32 pm

ViperOverLord wrote:
Victor Sullivan wrote:John McCain really needs to run in the 2012 election. I thought he got a bad rap, simply for being the same political party as Bush. He's pretty middle-of-the-road Republican and I think he would've gotten a lot more done than Obama has and he DEFINITELY wouldn't have supported that damned health care bill.


The deck was stacked against him. The economy was bad and Bush approval polls were bad and he was painted as GWB III. He also had to deal with an electorate that wanted to vote for a guy simply because he was a black rock star making history while singing hope and change while the media produced the vids for him. Their records didn't mean shiz in that election. McCain had no chance. All of that said, I'm not rooting for McCain to run again.


I think his age would be his largest handicap (particularly depending on who his running mate was, but even if it was a good option). You're right that he definitely paid for Bush...no question about that.
...I prefer a man who will burn the flag and then wrap himself in the Constitution to a man who will burn the Constitution and then wrap himself in the flag.
User avatar
Corporal 1st Class Woodruff
 
Posts: 5093
Joined: Sat Jan 05, 2008 9:15 am

Re: President John McCain

Postby oVo on Tue Oct 19, 2010 8:43 pm

Uninhibited free market capitalism, is that where bailed out banks would be lending money now? Unemployment under 6.5%... because McCain would hire any of the unemployed who can't find work in the fast food industry at minimum wage out of his own retirement fund? Corporatism run amok is ongoing and both parties problem... actually not a problem at all as both parties seem to receive generous benefits from it. Beaurocracy grew pretty fucking big during Bush's eight years and you expect John to reel it in? I don't think so, but I'm sure McCain would have found a way to end record foreclosures and allow people to keep their homes without government intervention.

John in 2012? Nah... Do you remember his response to the global financial crisis during the presidential campaign. He's still toast.

The Dems are being outspent by a ridiculous margin heading into the November elections and I'm sure there's no corporate cronyism at work there. Gee, think any politician will ever actually push for legitimate campaign reform and how many millions will the next presidential campaign cost? Be honest, it doesn't really matter anymore does it, because corporate America is the real winner regardless of which party is "in control."
User avatar
Major oVo
 
Posts: 3864
Joined: Fri Jan 26, 2007 1:41 pm
Location: Antarctica

Re: President John McCain

Postby Army of GOD on Tue Oct 19, 2010 8:45 pm

oVo wrote:Uninhibited free market capitalism, is that where bailed out banks would be lending money now? Unemployment under 6.5%... because McCain would hire any of the unemployed who can't find work in the fast food industry at minimum wage out of his own retirement fund? Corporatism run amok is ongoing and both parties problem... actually not a problem at all as both parties seem to receive generous benefits from it. Beaurocracy grew pretty fucking big during Bush's eight years and you expect John to reel it in? I don't think so, but I'm sure McCain would have found a way to end record foreclosures and allow people to keep their homes without government intervention.

John in 2012? Nah... Do you remember his response to the global financial crisis during the presidential campaign. He's still toast.

The Dems are being outspent by a ridiculous margin heading into the November elections and I'm sure there's no corporate cronyism at work there. Gee, think any politician will ever actually push for legitimate campaign reform and how many millions will the next presidential campaign cost? Be honest, it doesn't really matter anymore does it, because corporate America is the real winner regardless of which party is "in control."


That's an amazing avatar
mrswdk is a ho
User avatar
Lieutenant Army of GOD
 
Posts: 7191
Joined: Tue Feb 24, 2009 4:30 pm

Re: President John McCain

Postby ViperOverLord on Tue Oct 19, 2010 8:56 pm

oVo wrote:Uninhibited free market capitalism, is that where bailed out banks would be lending money now? Unemployment under 6.5%... because McCain would hire any of the unemployed who can't find work in the fast food industry at minimum wage out of his own retirement fund? Corporatism run amok is ongoing and both parties problem... actually not a problem at all as both parties seem to receive generous benefits from it. Beaurocracy grew pretty fucking big during Bush's eight years and you expect John to reel it in? I don't think so, but I'm sure McCain would have found a way to end record foreclosures and allow people to keep their homes without government intervention.

John in 2012? Nah... Do you remember his response to the global financial crisis during the presidential campaign. He's still toast.

The Dems are being outspent by a ridiculous margin heading into the November elections and I'm sure there's no corporate cronyism at work there. Gee, think any politician will ever actually push for legitimate campaign reform and how many millions will the next presidential campaign cost? Be honest, it doesn't really matter anymore does it, because corporate America is the real winner regardless of which party is "in control."


I said free market capitalism would be less inhibited and not uninhibited. I did not say McCain would not have done the bailouts. But health care is one example where free market capitalism would be less inhibited. McCain wanted to allow cross state insurance which makes complete sense. Unemployment would be down yes. Right now businesses are biding their time while Obama raises taxes right and left and as a result they are not hiring. Bla bla bla about bureaucracy growing under Bush. He added the Department of Homeland security and some agencies increased in size, but by no means did he go about creating hundreds and even thousands of bureaucracies like Obama so don't be throwing me your red herring argument. I didn't say anything about foreclosures, but I don't think Obama has done a damn thing to stop the foreclosure problem and in fact banks did not use his bailout funds to help the people, so he certainly couldn't have done worse. Nor would have McCain passed a 3.8 percent medicare tax that would f up the future of the home sales market. John's response to the financial global crisis? Yea I remember him stopping his campaign and going back to work. I remember Bill Clinton calling Obama out for not being smart enough to understand the crisis too. And as for Republicans outspending Dems well that's because the corporations don't want to spend their money on losers. Figure that one out. And it goes both ways. In 08, Obama had way more money to work with than McCain. Obama wasn't clamoring that it was unfair then. And I admit that corporatism is a problem, but I don't sit there and act like that it's as simple as all that. We can figure out ways to reign in their power but let's not pretend that they pull all the strings because they don't.
Last edited by ViperOverLord on Tue Oct 19, 2010 8:58 pm, edited 1 time in total.
User avatar
Captain ViperOverLord
 
Posts: 2485
Joined: Sun Apr 19, 2009 3:19 pm
Location: California

Re: President John McCain

Postby CreepersWiener on Tue Oct 19, 2010 8:57 pm

And what if President John McCain died?
Army of GOD wrote:I joined this game because it's so similar to Call of Duty.
User avatar
Sergeant CreepersWiener
 
Posts: 137
Joined: Tue Jul 21, 2009 6:22 pm

Re: President John McCain

Postby ViperOverLord on Tue Oct 19, 2010 9:01 pm

President McCain would not have had to be condescended to by Senator Obama while having that felonious health care summit in which Republicans supposedly were going to have their ideas listened to.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MPsbV-IvLDU
User avatar
Captain ViperOverLord
 
Posts: 2485
Joined: Sun Apr 19, 2009 3:19 pm
Location: California

Re: President John McCain

Postby Night Strike on Tue Oct 19, 2010 9:20 pm

Woodruff wrote:I think his age would be his largest handicap (particularly depending on who his running mate was, but even if it was a good option). You're right that he definitely paid for Bush...no question about that.


Speaking of that, shouldn't he be dead by now? I know that was one of the arguments against voting for him since Palin would then become president.
Image
User avatar
Major Night Strike
 
Posts: 8512
Joined: Wed Apr 18, 2007 2:52 pm

Re: President John McCain

Postby spurgistan on Tue Oct 19, 2010 9:53 pm

Night Strike wrote:
Woodruff wrote:I think his age would be his largest handicap (particularly depending on who his running mate was, but even if it was a good option). You're right that he definitely paid for Bush...no question about that.


Speaking of that, shouldn't he be dead by now? I know that was one of the arguments against voting for him since Palin would then become president.


Could, not would. And I'm hoping you're right, that McCain will live for a goodly long while. Maybe he'll live long enough to rediscover his spine?
Mr_Adams wrote:You, sir, are an idiot.


Timminz wrote:By that logic, you eat babies.
Sergeant spurgistan
 
Posts: 1868
Joined: Sat Oct 07, 2006 11:30 pm

Re: Washington D.C. resident John McCain

Postby oVo on Tue Oct 19, 2010 10:32 pm

The bailout occurred with Bush in office and this is about John McCain... not Obama. So the financial crunch... John did pause his campaign and go back to Washington where he rolled up his sleeves and discovered he had nothing to offer beyond his embarrassment that all those years in office he didn't see it coming. Hard to imagine a bunch of greedy investment banker types would abuse the system for profits beyond anyone's belief without government regulations over transactions. Doh! Um... not to get away from the subject... but recent history gave us a Dick Cheney who's corporate strings are barely transparent... who would say WTF? EVERYBODY WINS! (except the Yankees eh?) and corporatism won't be reigned in during our lifetime. It is what it is... quid pro quo and IT is here to stay, because it is now business as usual.
User avatar
Major oVo
 
Posts: 3864
Joined: Fri Jan 26, 2007 1:41 pm
Location: Antarctica

Re: Washington D.C. resident John McCain

Postby ViperOverLord on Tue Oct 19, 2010 10:57 pm

oVo wrote:The bailout occurred with Bush in office and this is about John McCain... not Obama. So the financial crunch... John did pause his campaign and go back to Washington where he rolled up his sleeves and discovered he had nothing to offer beyond his embarrassment that all those years in office he didn't see it coming. Hard to imagine a bunch of greedy investment banker types would abuse the system for profits beyond anyone's belief without government regulations over transactions. Doh! Um... not to get away from the subject... but recent history gave us a Dick Cheney who's corporate strings are barely transparent... who would say WTF? EVERYBODY WINS! (except the Yankees eh?) and corporatism won't be reigned in during our lifetime. It is what it is... quid pro quo and IT is here to stay, because it is now business as usual.


OK so you're claiming we'd have the same bailouts that Obama did? What is your point? It still doesn't relate to anything I initially said.
User avatar
Captain ViperOverLord
 
Posts: 2485
Joined: Sun Apr 19, 2009 3:19 pm
Location: California

Re: President John McCain

Postby The Bison King on Tue Oct 19, 2010 11:05 pm

I think having Sara Palin as his running mate crippled his chances too. If McCain was elected there would be no tea party.
Image

Hi, my name is the Bison King, and I am COMPLETELY aware of DaFont!
User avatar
Sergeant 1st Class The Bison King
 
Posts: 1957
Joined: Thu Aug 27, 2009 5:06 pm
Location: the Mid-Westeros

Re: President John McCain

Postby Gold Knight on Tue Oct 19, 2010 11:46 pm

Incandenza wrote:
ViperOverLord wrote:Free market capitalism would not be as inhibited. Unemployment would probably be under 6.5 percent. The media would be doing their daily death counts for Aghanistan. The Democrats would be looking at gaining seats in The House, Senate and possibly the governorships. Sarah Palin would have taken her place as the next Dan Quayle, sufficiently smashed by the media and unable to run for the presidency. Barrack Obama would still be everyone's hero and he and the Clintons would be looking for ways to subtly denigrate each other as they prepare for runs in 2012. The liberal media would be going on about how a decade of Bush style politics are screwing us over. There would still be a budget deficit, but nowhere near what is now. Health care cost would not have went up 20 percent and we would have tort reform instead of socialized health care, excuse me 'the public option.' Bureaucracy and socialism would not be as rampant. Liberals would be feel like victims still. They would be calling blood for oil and the whole 9 yards and screaming more about corporatism run a muck.


Image


:lol: This needs to be posted more often...
Image
xxtig12683xx wrote:yea, my fav part was being in the sewer riding a surfboard and wacking these alien creatures.

shit was badass
User avatar
Captain Gold Knight
 
Posts: 2749
Joined: Tue Apr 17, 2007 9:47 am
Location: Out here in these woods...

Re: President John McCain

Postby GabonX on Wed Oct 20, 2010 2:02 am

oVo wrote:John in 2012? Nah... Do you remember his response to the global financial crisis during the presidential campaign. He's still toast.

God forbid a Senator would want to suspend a political campaign to address a national crisis. :roll:

CreepersWiener wrote:And what if President John McCain died?

Our President would have nice tits and still be more fit for the job (though "more fit for" is not the same as "fit for") ...
Spazz Arcane wrote:If birds could swim and fish could fly I would awaken in the morning to the sturgeons cry. If fish could fly and birds could swim I'd still use worms to fish for them.
saxitoxin wrote:I'm on Team GabonX
User avatar
Captain GabonX
 
Posts: 899
Joined: Sat Jul 08, 2006 10:38 am

Re: President John McCain

Postby Woodruff on Wed Oct 20, 2010 11:32 am

Night Strike wrote:
Woodruff wrote:I think his age would be his largest handicap (particularly depending on who his running mate was, but even if it was a good option). You're right that he definitely paid for Bush...no question about that.


Speaking of that, shouldn't he be dead by now? I know that was one of the arguments against voting for him since Palin would then become president.


I think it was a legitimate argument. The idea of Sarah Palin as our President would have been enough for me to vote against him even if his voting record on military matters weren't blasphemous.
...I prefer a man who will burn the flag and then wrap himself in the Constitution to a man who will burn the Constitution and then wrap himself in the flag.
User avatar
Corporal 1st Class Woodruff
 
Posts: 5093
Joined: Sat Jan 05, 2008 9:15 am

Re: resident John McCain

Postby oVo on Wed Oct 20, 2010 1:09 pm

GabonX wrote:God forbid a Senator would want to suspend a political campaign
to address a national crisis. :roll:

The thing at the time was that his staff went to great lengths to promote this fact.
Unfortunately for McCain it only showed how ineffectual he was to the process
of resolving this calamity and instead publicized the fact he had no solution.

I'm feeling much better today, now that airlines are publishing their 3rd quarter profits
of hundreds of millions of dollars. We can all feel secure in the knowledge that the
economy has begun turning around.
User avatar
Major oVo
 
Posts: 3864
Joined: Fri Jan 26, 2007 1:41 pm
Location: Antarctica

Re: resident John McCain

Postby GabonX on Wed Oct 20, 2010 1:48 pm

oVo wrote:
GabonX wrote:God forbid a Senator would want to suspend a political campaign
to address a national crisis. :roll:

The thing at the time was that his staff went to great lengths to promote this fact.
Unfortunately for McCain it only showed how ineffectual he was to the process
of resolving this calamity and instead publicized the fact he had no solution.

I'm feeling much better today, now that airlines are publishing their 3rd quarter profits
of hundreds of millions of dollars. We can all feel secure in the knowledge that the
economy has begun turning around.

lol
Spazz Arcane wrote:If birds could swim and fish could fly I would awaken in the morning to the sturgeons cry. If fish could fly and birds could swim I'd still use worms to fish for them.
saxitoxin wrote:I'm on Team GabonX
User avatar
Captain GabonX
 
Posts: 899
Joined: Sat Jul 08, 2006 10:38 am

Re: President John McCain

Postby alex951 on Wed Oct 20, 2010 5:44 pm

where did McCain stand on the bailout? I forgot
User avatar
Private 1st Class alex951
 
Posts: 920
Joined: Thu Aug 28, 2008 1:00 pm

Next

Return to Acceptable Content

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users