Conquer Club

Time(28) v Brethren of the Fat Mermaid(32) FINAL BoFM Wins

Finished challenges between two competitive clans.

Moderator: Clan Directors

Forum rules
Please read the Community Guidelines before posting.

Re: Time(27) v Brethren of the Fat Mermaid(31) [bofm winner

Postby Ryno99 on Thu Dec 02, 2010 9:54 am

Great battle Time you definitely held your own and had us on the ropes til the very end.
Major Ryno99
 
Posts: 61
Joined: Wed Mar 17, 2010 10:08 am

Re: Time(27) v Brethren of the Fat Mermaid(31) [bofm winner

Postby eddie2 on Fri Dec 03, 2010 8:08 am

Hold the horses somthing has come to light.
User avatar
Sergeant 1st Class eddie2
 
Posts: 4263
Joined: Sun Sep 20, 2009 10:56 am
Location: Southampton uk

Re: Time(27) v Brethren of the Fat Mermaid(31) [bofm winner

Postby ljex on Sat Dec 04, 2010 12:14 am

eddie2 wrote:Hold the horses somthing has come to light.


which is?
User avatar
Major ljex
 
Posts: 2814
Joined: Sat Sep 13, 2008 12:12 am

Re: Time(27) v Brethren of the Fat Mermaid(31) [bofm winner

Postby jefjef on Sat Dec 04, 2010 12:25 am

ljex wrote:
eddie2 wrote:Hold the horses somthing has come to light.


which is?


Well. Knowing eddie and his desperation for a victory it is probably about Megas and I getting our new clan KOA approved Thu Dec 02. Which really has no bearing on anything. We only had/have 1 active clan war game in progress which is going to be a loss for BotFM. The war will still be a victory for the Mermaids. ;)

So maybe he wants that game disqualified. Go for it.

If that's what it is then Suck it up cupcake. Accept the loss and move on...
This post was made by jefjef who should be on your ignore list.
Image
drunkmonkey wrote:I'm filing a C&A report right now. Its nice because they have a drop-down for "jefjef".
User avatar
Colonel jefjef
 
Posts: 6026
Joined: Mon Feb 23, 2009 8:41 pm
Location: on my ass

Re: Time(27) v Brethren of the Fat Mermaid(31) [under inves

Postby 4 U 2 NV on Sat Dec 04, 2010 1:13 am

doubt eddie would use that excuse to pull off a win. it would just be hypocritical of him seeing his stance on the whole KORT/TOFU fiasco
Image
User avatar
Brigadier 4 U 2 NV
 
Posts: 758
Joined: Sun May 07, 2006 2:41 pm
Location: Toronto, ON

Re: Time(27) v Brethren of the Fat Mermaid(31) [under inves

Postby 4 U 2 NV on Sat Dec 04, 2010 1:15 am

double posted. congrats to BotFM for the win and to TIME for putting up a great battle
Image
User avatar
Brigadier 4 U 2 NV
 
Posts: 758
Joined: Sun May 07, 2006 2:41 pm
Location: Toronto, ON

Re: Time(27) v Brethren of the Fat Mermaid(31) [under inves

Postby drunkmonkey on Sat Dec 04, 2010 2:52 am

Seriously...just post the final score and move on. It was a fantastic battle, of which no one expected this close of an outcome. Well played, both clans.
Image
User avatar
Major drunkmonkey
 
Posts: 1704
Joined: Thu May 14, 2009 4:00 pm

Re: Time(27) v Brethren of the Fat Mermaid(31) [under inves

Postby sdh on Sat Dec 04, 2010 4:10 am

eddie mentioned this to me, it has nothing to do with KOA. Still can't see it changing the score though.
Brigadier sdh
 
Posts: 1661
Joined: Sun Apr 05, 2009 7:43 am
2426

Re: Time(27) v Brethren of the Fat Mermaid(31) [under inves

Postby Eyestone on Sat Dec 04, 2010 4:18 am

:lol: :lol: :lol: "Under ivestigation" :lol: :lol: :lol:
User avatar
General Eyestone
 
Posts: 280
Joined: Thu Mar 16, 2006 10:45 am
Location: Trondheim - Norway

Re: Time(27) v Brethren of the Fat Mermaid(31) [under inves

Postby eddie2 on Sat Dec 04, 2010 5:01 am

JefJef i am not that petty. there has been a possible breach of a said site rule during the challenge i have put 3 options out there for this to be dealt with. and will update this thread accordingly once a final response is made about what happens. After contact between clans has finished. and ps a couple of other clan leaders have noticed the same thing, but have not acted on it because of the win of the challenge.
User avatar
Sergeant 1st Class eddie2
 
Posts: 4263
Joined: Sun Sep 20, 2009 10:56 am
Location: Southampton uk

Re: Time(27) v Brethren of the Fat Mermaid(31) [under inves

Postby BoganGod on Sat Dec 04, 2010 12:34 pm

We won, TIME lost, we WON under manned with one important player in hospital(9games)....... Please don't do this to yourself eddie. I would like to think you are smarter than this.
Image
Corporal BoganGod
 
Posts: 5873
Joined: Mon Apr 07, 2008 7:08 am
Location: Heaven's Gate Retirement Home

Re: Time(27) v Brethren of the Fat Mermaid(31) [under inves

Postby eddie2 on Sat Dec 04, 2010 12:42 pm

BoganGod wrote:We won, TIME lost, we WON under manned with one important player in hospital(9games)....... Please don't do this to yourself eddie. I would like to think you are smarter than this.


bogan do what i gave you 3 options that cover it all. all i can say is have your win.the win or lose does not really bother me, the player in hospital i feel sorry for but that has nothing to do with this incident. At the end of it there has been abuse of babysitting in the games and bofm will have to pay one way or another for this. or since you want to bring i9t to the forums i should post all the evidence and see what the clan world say about it.
User avatar
Sergeant 1st Class eddie2
 
Posts: 4263
Joined: Sun Sep 20, 2009 10:56 am
Location: Southampton uk

Re: Time(27) v Brethren of the Fat Mermaid(31) [under inves

Postby ljex on Sat Dec 04, 2010 12:52 pm

eddie2 wrote:
BoganGod wrote:We won, TIME lost, we WON under manned with one important player in hospital(9games)....... Please don't do this to yourself eddie. I would like to think you are smarter than this.


bogan do what i gave you 3 options that cover it all. all i can say is have your win.the win or lose does not really bother me, the player in hospital i feel sorry for but that has nothing to do with this incident. At the end of it there has been abuse of babysitting in the games and bofm will have to pay one way or another for this. or since you want to bring i9t to the forums i should post all the evidence and see what the clan world say about it.


you shouldn't have brought it to the forms at all if you weren't going to share your evidence...now i don't know what you should do as i don't know what the evidence is.
User avatar
Major ljex
 
Posts: 2814
Joined: Sat Sep 13, 2008 12:12 am

Re: Time(27) v Brethren of the Fat Mermaid(31) [under inves

Postby jrh_cardinal on Sat Dec 04, 2010 1:02 pm

ljex wrote:you shouldn't have brought it to the forms at all if you weren't going to share your evidence...now i don't know what you should do as i don't know what the evidence is.

agreed. Trying to resolve it through PMs was a good decision, but posting "under investigation" was the worst choice you could make.
You're trying to act like your taking the high road, while standing naked jumping and screaming "I'm mature, I didn't post it publicly"
Image
User avatar
Sergeant 1st Class jrh_cardinal
 
Posts: 2688
Joined: Sat May 16, 2009 7:15 pm

Re: Time(27) v Brethren of the Fat Mermaid(31)

Postby MegasWoman on Sat Dec 04, 2010 1:16 pm

What you managed to do EDDIE was let other clans know NOT to do a clan war with you. You are now grasping at straws and a sore loser. Take it like a man and MOVE ON.
User avatar
Sergeant MegasWoman
 
Posts: 505
Joined: Wed Sep 17, 2008 1:29 am
Location: Texas

Re: Time(27) v Brethren of the Fat Mermaid(31) [under inves

Postby Lubawski on Sat Dec 04, 2010 1:25 pm

eddie2 wrote: At the end of it there has been abuse of babysitting in the games and bofm will have to pay one way or another for this. or since you want to bring i9t to the forums i should post all the evidence and see what the clan world say about it.


Could it really have been that bad? You have a 15 game max allowance, and according to your script in the OP, the most anyone has played is 10 games. There would have been no reason to inappropriately babysit someone's account.
Image
User avatar
Colonel Lubawski
 
Posts: 1093
Joined: Tue May 29, 2007 2:59 pm
Location: Boston, Mass

Re: Time(27) v Brethren of the Fat Mermaid(31) [under inves

Postby eddie2 on Sat Dec 04, 2010 1:37 pm

Lubawski wrote:
eddie2 wrote: At the end of it there has been abuse of babysitting in the games and bofm will have to pay one way or another for this. or since you want to bring i9t to the forums i should post all the evidence and see what the clan world say about it.


Could it really have been that bad? You have a 15 game max allowance, and according to your script in the OP, the most anyone has played is 10 games. There would have been no reason to inappropriately babysit someone's account.


Like i said previously i will update this thread when bofm respond i will also now need to post all info about this. i will do tomorow.
User avatar
Sergeant 1st Class eddie2
 
Posts: 4263
Joined: Sun Sep 20, 2009 10:56 am
Location: Southampton uk

Re: Time(27) v Brethren of the Fat Mermaid(31)

Postby MegasWoman on Sat Dec 04, 2010 2:03 pm

ofcourse you do! That was your intent all along-since you lost now it's time for dragging people through the mud. Typical.
User avatar
Sergeant MegasWoman
 
Posts: 505
Joined: Wed Sep 17, 2008 1:29 am
Location: Texas

Re: Time(27) v Brethren of the Fat Mermaid(31) [under inves

Postby jrh_cardinal on Sat Dec 04, 2010 2:34 pm

Lubawski wrote:Could it really have been that bad? You have a 15 game max allowance, and according to your script in the OP, the most anyone has played is 10 games. There would have been no reason to inappropriately babysit someone's account.

Then the OP is out of date, people have played more than 10.
Speaking of, eddie, you definitely need to update. There are at least 10 games that are completed and that you have scored, but aren't marked with winners, along with the very old screenshots of games played (at least the 3rd one is very old). I don't mean to bring up old problems, but weren't you the one saying the incident was korts fault because they didn't update the op? Maybe you should follow your own rules.

MegasWoman wrote:ofcourse you do! That was your intent all along-since you lost now it's time for dragging people through the mud. Typical.

You're in the clan, learn what you're talking about before you starting flaming everyone else. Typical bofm.
Image
User avatar
Sergeant 1st Class jrh_cardinal
 
Posts: 2688
Joined: Sat May 16, 2009 7:15 pm

Re: Time(27) v Brethren of the Fat Mermaid(31) [under inves

Postby eddie2 on Sat Dec 04, 2010 2:42 pm

jrh_cardinal wrote:
Lubawski wrote:Could it really have been that bad? You have a 15 game max allowance, and according to your script in the OP, the most anyone has played is 10 games. There would have been no reason to inappropriately babysit someone's account.

Then the OP is out of date, people have played more than 10.
Speaking of, eddie, you definitely need to update. There are at least 10 games that are completed and that you have scored, but aren't marked with winners, along with the very old screenshots of games played (at least the 3rd one is very old). I don't mean to bring up old problems, but weren't you the one saying the incident was korts fault because they didn't update the op? Maybe you should follow your own rules.

MegasWoman wrote:ofcourse you do! That was your intent all along-since you lost now it's time for dragging people through the mud. Typical.

You're in the clan, learn what you're talking about before you starting flaming everyone else. Typical bofm.


jrh the play list was updated before the 3rd set was played and i have said i will finish off the updates when all games are finished and close it down same time.
User avatar
Sergeant 1st Class eddie2
 
Posts: 4263
Joined: Sun Sep 20, 2009 10:56 am
Location: Southampton uk

Re: Time(27) v Brethren of the Fat Mermaid(31) [under inves

Postby jefjef on Sat Dec 04, 2010 2:55 pm

jrh_cardinal wrote:
MegasWoman wrote:ofcourse you do! That was your intent all along-since you lost now it's time for dragging people through the mud. Typical.

You're in the clan, learn what you're talking about before you starting flaming everyone else. Typical bofm.


Learn what YOU are talking about.

Megas is no longer part of the Brethren and this is no where close to a flame.

Typical baited post from you. Welcome to my foe list.

BYE.

As for the clan war. It is a Brethren win. In no way can a sitter taking a turn for bogan be considered as for strategic purposes.
This post was made by jefjef who should be on your ignore list.
Image
drunkmonkey wrote:I'm filing a C&A report right now. Its nice because they have a drop-down for "jefjef".
User avatar
Colonel jefjef
 
Posts: 6026
Joined: Mon Feb 23, 2009 8:41 pm
Location: on my ass

Re: Time(27) v Brethren of the Fat Mermaid(31)

Postby MegasWoman on Sat Dec 04, 2010 2:58 pm

Whoever you are JRH. I was BOFM and part of the challenge (hence the name of the thread?) so why don't you go find your own and put your issues in there. And since I know exactly what the "under investigation" for Eddie is-why don't you follow your own advice and learn what you are talking about before you go running off at the mouth at me.
User avatar
Sergeant MegasWoman
 
Posts: 505
Joined: Wed Sep 17, 2008 1:29 am
Location: Texas

Re: Time(27) v Brethren of the Fat Mermaid(31)

Postby eddie2 on Sat Dec 04, 2010 4:07 pm

MegasWoman wrote:Whoever you are JRH. I was BOFM and part of the challenge (hence the name of the thread?) so why don't you go find your own and put your issues in there. And since I know exactly what the "under investigation" for Eddie is-why don't you follow your own advice and learn what you are talking about before you go running off at the mouth at me.



megas plz there are 3 or 4 clan leaders i notified of this situation before i posted. and all have said this is cheating.(1 of them has even said they noticed the same thing but did not pursue it because they won the challenge.) also saying the offers i gave you were reasonable. now as for me going to post this all along plz read the thread i stated that there was an issue and i would update the thread once the issue had been resolved.(only stating the outcome of it.) then bogangod came in making it sound like i was punishing your old clan for a player being in hospital.(i do not know what player but he was not involved in the issue.) also since you are no longer a member of bofm you do not know all the information. but i still can not finish off the thread till i have had a official response from bogangod or a bofm leader. not 2 old members of the clan.
User avatar
Sergeant 1st Class eddie2
 
Posts: 4263
Joined: Sun Sep 20, 2009 10:56 am
Location: Southampton uk

Re: Time(27) v Brethren of the Fat Mermaid(31)

Postby Arama86n on Sat Dec 04, 2010 4:23 pm

eddie2 wrote:
MegasWoman wrote:Whoever you are JRH. I was BOFM and part of the challenge (hence the name of the thread?) so why don't you go find your own and put your issues in there. And since I know exactly what the "under investigation" for Eddie is-why don't you follow your own advice and learn what you are talking about before you go running off at the mouth at me.



megas plz there are 3 or 4 clan leaders i notified of this situation before i posted. and all have said this is cheating.(1 of them has even said they noticed the same thing but did not pursue it because they won the challenge.) also saying the offers i gave you were reasonable. now as for me going to post this all along plz read the thread i stated that there was an issue and i would update the thread once the issue had been resolved.(only stating the outcome of it.) then bogangod came in making it sound like i was punishing your old clan for a player being in hospital.(i do not know what player but he was not involved in the issue.) also since you are no longer a member of bofm you do not know all the information. but i still can not finish off the thread till i have had a official response from bogangod or a bofm leader. not 2 old members of the clan.


Very intersting eddie. A clan refrained from accusing us because they won the challenge? hmm
Before defeating TIME, BoFM defeated (in order from today backwards); Imperial Dragoons, Legends of the Zone, the Last Warriors, Fist Full of 6's, Grim Reapers.
First then, about one and a half year ago or so did BoFM lose a clanwar, against Knights of the Round Table at the time. Are you suggesting that KoRT are accusing us of cheating? or have you been digging even further back perhaps? Because before that challenge, half of todays clan wasn't even here, including BoganGod.

This whole issue is absurd and pathetic. You are trying to exploit an honest mistake and make as huge a deal of it as you can. And what really makes me sick is that in the first PM you sent to me, you hinted that you got the idea for these accusations because one of your own members has been reprimanded for Babysitting abuse, points dumping, (and today been busted with a multi).

I can honestly say that TIME has not been wronged in anyway in this challenge, and it truly makes one sick how low you are willing to sink.
User avatar
Major Arama86n
 
Posts: 2275
Joined: Thu Jul 23, 2009 1:32 pm
Location: Gothenburg, Sweden

Re: Time(27) v Brethren of the Fat Mermaid(31)

Postby eddie2 on Sat Dec 04, 2010 4:26 pm

Arama86n wrote:
eddie2 wrote:
MegasWoman wrote:Whoever you are JRH. I was BOFM and part of the challenge (hence the name of the thread?) so why don't you go find your own and put your issues in there. And since I know exactly what the "under investigation" for Eddie is-why don't you follow your own advice and learn what you are talking about before you go running off at the mouth at me.



megas plz there are 3 or 4 clan leaders i notified of this situation before i posted. and all have said this is cheating.(1 of them has even said they noticed the same thing but did not pursue it because they won the challenge.) also saying the offers i gave you were reasonable. now as for me going to post this all along plz read the thread i stated that there was an issue and i would update the thread once the issue had been resolved.(only stating the outcome of it.) then bogangod came in making it sound like i was punishing your old clan for a player being in hospital.(i do not know what player but he was not involved in the issue.) also since you are no longer a member of bofm you do not know all the information. but i still can not finish off the thread till i have had a official response from bogangod or a bofm leader. not 2 old members of the clan.


Very intersting eddie. A clan refrained from accusing us because they won the challenge? hmm
Before defeating TIME, BoFM defeated (in order from today backwards); Imperial Dragoons, Legends of the Zone, the Last Warriors, Fist Full of 6's, Grim Reapers.
First then, about one and a half year ago or so did BoFM lose a clanwar, against Knights of the Round Table at the time. Are you suggesting that KoRT are accusing us of cheating? or have you been digging even further back perhaps? Because before that challenge, half of todays clan wasn't even here, including BoganGod.

This whole issue is absurd and pathetic. You are trying to exploit an honest mistake and make as huge a deal of it as you can. And what really makes me sick is that in the first PM you sent to me, you hinted that you got the idea for these accusations because one of your own members has been reprimanded for Babysitting abuse, points dumping, (and today been busted with a multi).

I can honestly say that TIME has not been wronged in anyway in this challenge, and it truly makes one sick how low you are willing to sink.



no i got the information for this because of a comment about 2 many players having a password for the said player. but buddysystem was on holiday when he was being sat for. not posting in the forums and playing speed games. while other players were taking his shots in team games.
User avatar
Sergeant 1st Class eddie2
 
Posts: 4263
Joined: Sun Sep 20, 2009 10:56 am
Location: Southampton uk

PreviousNext

Return to Complete Challenges

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users