Doubles Games (based on team score)

[Khan22]

Dust Bowl (No spoils No Fog Chained Doubles)
Game 8111908 Opened
Game 8111915 Opened
Game 8128735 Opened
San Marino (Same settings as dust bowl)
Game 8128738 Full
USA Southwest (Same settings)
Game 8127540 Full
(looking generally similar team scores)

[theherkman]

Dust Bowl (No spoils No Fog Chained Doubles)
Game 8111908 Opened
Game 8111915 Opened
(I'm looking generally similar team scores)

Otherwise you foe and give revenge ratings. Isn't that right?

[Khan22]

Bump

[Khan22]

WWII Poland (No spoils No Fog Chained Doubles)
Game 8140800 Opened
USA (Same settings as above)
Game 8140803 Opened
(looking generally similar team scores)

[macbone]

I've been playing a few games with khan as my partner, and he's conducted himself well. In addition, the ratings he leaves are far and away better than yours, herk. Dang, son. Compared to the ratings you leave, khan's a saint. =)

http://www.conquerclub.com/player.php?mode=ratings2&username=theherkman

[theherkman]

I've been playing a few games with khan as my partner, and he's conducted himself well. In addition, the ratings he leaves are far and away better than yours, herk. Dang, son. Compared to the ratings you leave, khan's a saint. =)

http://www.conquerclub.com/player.php?mode=ratings2&username=theherkman

It's not about the kind of rating you leave. Its about why you leave them. I generally do not rate at all unless they deserve 1/5 stars for very poor conduct. For instance if they get their win by breaking a truce or randomly go into a tirade against an undeserving player, I will rate. It is rare that I will go to the trouble when players play well.

Now Khan, on the other hand, rated both Great-Ollie and I 1/5 and foed us. His reasoning is sketchy and he generally has not backed this up with facts. Instead when he is shown to be wrong his response is to ignore our response.

So, go ahead and keep trying to make him look like he is a nice guy. He has yet to retract his rating of 1/5 stars. It's very sketchy when the only game chat was 'gg' and 'gl'. Even sketchier when we won and received those ratings...

So why don't you tell him to fight his own battles and stop posting in his defense.

[Khan22]

Now Khan, on the other hand, rated both Great-Ollie and I 1/5 and foed us. His reasoning is sketchy and he generally has not backed this up with facts. Instead when he is shown to be wrong his response is to ignore our response.

I back up what I say with facts all the time. I feel a lot of what I am accused of is incorrect facts. I find that those facts withhold the whole truth in some attempt to makes me look bad. For example, when you say

Instead when he is shown to be wrong his response is to ignore

Your not trying to show me to be wrong and I am if I am wrong I have no problem freely admitting it. Techniqually ignoring isn't much of a response.

Me and Great-Ollie have shared a few sentences I got no problems with him. We talked and he has no poor rating from me nor do you.

So, go ahead and keep trying to make him look like he is a nice guy.

Well from our conversation in our first Game 7893506 it seems that I'm a pretty nice guy. In fact if you took the time to get to know me I believe strongly that you would view me as a nice guy as well. Macbone is not trying to make me look like a nice guy that is what he knows about me and thought about pointing it out. Although I don't think he is incorrect I will go over some of the ways I rate people and how it evolved in another paragraph.

He has yet to retract his rating of 1/5 stars. It's very sketchy when the only game chat was 'gg' and 'gl'. Even sketchier when we won and received those ratings...

First game we had together we talked a whole bunch. It was an interesting game fun and lasted longer. Game 7893506
The second game (first doubles one) against me Game 7899921 more then gg and gl is shared. Sometimes I talk too much in some games in others I tend to like sticking only to Gl and gg.

Third game Game 7945280 was the same exact incident recurring I was very unhappy with problems recurring so I definitely stuck to the bare minimum without trying to lose much politeness.

The way I rate people slowly evolved actually until this issue happened. Since the issue way I rate people evolved very fast because I took a lot of time thinking deeply about the best way to rate people. I rated people extremely well which is why you see Macbone claiming my ratings make me look like a saint. One thing that hasn't changed that evolved before our issue accused was if someone played horribly I didn't rate them. Another thing was I generally didn't rate people poorly before playing them multiple times. Don't forget the rating I gave you after our first game was all 5s.

You don't have a bad rating from me

[theherkman]

I'm not going to come back with a long reply, because I'm tired of arguing about this. I do want to thank you for retracting your rating. That was my only issue with you. I'm sure you are a nice guy, next time, please just ask me to stop joining or to find a lower ranked partner. Good luck in future games!

Herk

[Khan22]

Your rating was retracted weeks ago.
(just to clarify for everyone else reading this)

Only reason I think you continued this whole thing for as long as you did is because you didn't realize I wouldn't speak up for myself and clarify my purity in the situation.

[theherkman]

The only reason I continued is so that you would retract a rating given not on gameplay but because of our points. That was extremely frustrating. That is why I continued. How was I to know that it had been retracted? I had checked several times and it had not been. It had nothing to do with you speaking up for yourself. It had to do with what is right and wrong. Most would agree rating 1/5 and foe-ing is the wrong response when you don't like the team score you are up against.