Moderator: Community Team
Night Strike wrote:Woodruff wrote:Night Strike wrote:Woodruff wrote:Night Strike wrote:saxitoxin wrote:Obama desperately deploying ground troops to countries around the world as his facilities are falling like dominoes -
I don't understand why all these defensive troops are being sent AFTER the protestors breach the embassies instead of before. Everything this president is doing is reactionary, and it's putting our citizens in danger.
Seriously, Night Strike? There's almost certainly a buttload of very sensitive information there. I mean, geez...at least find something legitimate to bitch about.
So shouldn't those teams arrive before the protestors show up at the embassies instead of after?
I suppose if you expect the President (or one of his subordinates) to be omniscient.
Considering there are reports that the administration knew 48 hours ahead of time that attacks in Libya were likely, omniscience isn't necessary. Furthermore, they also knew that Tuesday was 9/11, so any partially credible threats should have resulted in a beefed up security contingent. But even if we assume nothing more could have been done to protect the embassy in Cairo and the consulate in Benghazi, that is no reason to completely ignore the other embassies and fail to give them more protection before violence breaks out in their locations. Especially since they had a day or two before the radical Imams issued their Friday "prayers".
Night Strike wrote:Woodruff wrote:Night Strike wrote:Woodruff wrote:Night Strike wrote:So shouldn't those teams arrive before the protestors show up at the embassies instead of after?
I suppose if you expect the President (or one of his subordinates) to be omniscient.
Considering there are reports that the administration knew 48 hours ahead of time that attacks in Libya were likely
Got a link? (I'm not saying you're wrong, but this is the first I've heard of it and I would like to see it.)
The administration has adamantly denied the reports, but here is the article: http://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/politics/revealed-inside-story-of-us-envoys-assassination-8135797.html
Night Strike wrote:Oh yeah, why did I even post the link when saxi already did and Woody already ignored?
Woodruff wrote:Night Strike wrote:Oh yeah, why did I even post the link when saxi already did and Woody already ignored?
Excuse me? A week or so ago, I decided to foe saxitoxin (a decision which has greatly improved my time here), so I don't see anything he posts. So in summation, please f*ck off.
Pack Rat wrote:if it quacks like a duck and walk like a duck, it's still fascism
viewtopic.php?f=8&t=241668&start=200#p5349880
As they neared the US consulate, mounted police forcibly dispersed the Palestinian protesters firing stun grenades. At the Old Cityās Herodās Gate another group of Palestinians injured a few police officers with stones. Some were detained.
http://www.debka.com/article/22355/Moun ... -consulate
Pack Rat wrote:if it quacks like a duck and walk like a duck, it's still fascism
viewtopic.php?f=8&t=241668&start=200#p5349880
saxitoxin wrote:Woodruff wrote:Night Strike wrote:Oh yeah, why did I even post the link when saxi already did and Woody already ignored?
Excuse me? A week or so ago, I decided to foe saxitoxin (a decision which has greatly improved my time here), so I don't see anything he posts. So in summation, please f*ck off.
I, by contrast, Friended Woodruff a week or so ago.
Hundreds of demonstrators threw projectiles at officers outside the US consulate in Sydney, shouting āDown, down USA,ā AFP reported.
http://rt.com/news/police-australia-pro ... ydney-187/
Pack Rat wrote:if it quacks like a duck and walk like a duck, it's still fascism
viewtopic.php?f=8&t=241668&start=200#p5349880
Pack Rat wrote:if it quacks like a duck and walk like a duck, it's still fascism
viewtopic.php?f=8&t=241668&start=200#p5349880
saxitoxin wrote:Woodruff wrote:
Excuse me? A week or so ago, I decided to foe saxitoxin (a decision which has greatly improved my time here), so I don't see anything he posts. So in summation, please f*ck off.
I, by contrast, Friended Woodruff a week or so ago.
saxitoxin wrote:In Sydney, average Australians fed-up with Obama and his wars attempt to storm the U.S. consulate and burn it to the ground - repelled by combat police.Hundreds of demonstrators threw projectiles at officers outside the US consulate in Sydney, shouting āDown, down USA,ā AFP reported.
http://rt.com/news/police-australia-pro ... ydney-187/
PLAYER57832 wrote:Too many of those who claim they don't believe global warming are really "end-timer" Christians.
Woodruff wrote:thegreekdog wrote:I would be very disappointed if sensitive information were placed on the hard drives of computers in an embassy.
I would be shocked if there weren't sensitive information on the hard drives of at least some of the computers in the embassy. It seems rational to me that embassy personnel (whether they be security personnel or the diplomatic personnel) would need access to sensitive material, and computers are the most likely way to not only transmit that information, but also to protect it.
I would be more concerned about encryption codes (protecting that sensitive information) eventually being broken due to the computer access rather than the sensitive information itself. That's likely much more of a problem, in my opinion.
Pack Rat wrote:if it quacks like a duck and walk like a duck, it's still fascism
viewtopic.php?f=8&t=241668&start=200#p5349880
saxitoxin wrote:No, this is about people fed-up with their children being victims of Obama's Permanent War. If Beck were running the show things would be equally as chaotic now because he, like Obama, wants carnage on a global scale and is a radical Zionist.
In Libya, a secular, democratic government was bombed out of existence and Sharia fanatics put in place, but it had nothing to do with a desire to put Sharia fanatics in power. They just happened to be the ones waiting in the wings. If Amway salesmen were waiting in the wings, they'd be the ones in power. The U.S. claims they are concerned about al-Qaeda but then try to destroy the enemies of al-Qaeda like Hezbollah, the Libyan Jamahriyah, the Syrian Arab Republic, etc. If the Dr. Saif al-Islam is released from NATO/Militia custody he could, in six months, wipe al-Qaeda out of the Maghreb. The Americans know this but they've backed themselves into a weird contortion they could never hope to untangle, all because of the Zionists.
tl;dr - The U.S. doesn't have an Arab problem, the U.S. has an Israel problem.
BigBallinStalin wrote:Why do Americans protest so little?
Is it because of the government goodies?
Is it because of the education? The nationalism?
Phatscotty wrote:saxitoxin wrote:No, this is about people fed-up with their children being victims of Obama's Permanent War. If Beck were running the show things would be equally as chaotic now because he, like Obama, wants carnage on a global scale and is a radical Zionist.
In Libya, a secular, democratic government was bombed out of existence and Sharia fanatics put in place, but it had nothing to do with a desire to put Sharia fanatics in power. They just happened to be the ones waiting in the wings. If Amway salesmen were waiting in the wings, they'd be the ones in power. The U.S. claims they are concerned about al-Qaeda but then try to destroy the enemies of al-Qaeda like Hezbollah, the Libyan Jamahriyah, the Syrian Arab Republic, etc. If the Dr. Saif al-Islam is released from NATO/Militia custody he could, in six months, wipe al-Qaeda out of the Maghreb. The Americans know this but they've backed themselves into a weird contortion they could never hope to untangle, all because of the Zionists.
tl;dr - The U.S. doesn't have an Arab problem, the U.S. has an Israel problem.
I'm not saying I'm satisfied that Obama got involved in Libya, or even Egypt for that matter. Beck was right in that he knew the Sharia fanatics were the ones waiting in the wings. He was shouting it from the rooftops. Whether or not the desire was there, this was EXTREMELY predictable....
Pack Rat wrote:if it quacks like a duck and walk like a duck, it's still fascism
viewtopic.php?f=8&t=241668&start=200#p5349880
Phatscotty wrote:BigBallinStalin wrote:Why do Americans protest so little?
Is it because of the government goodies?
Is it because of the education? The nationalism?
Secularism is a part of it... Religion and it's use and abuse to control people actions and warp their minds is at the root of the protests in 21 countries, specifically all across to Middle East (not to paint with too broad a brush)
notyou2 wrote:Woodruff wrote:thegreekdog wrote:I would be very disappointed if sensitive information were placed on the hard drives of computers in an embassy.
I would be shocked if there weren't sensitive information on the hard drives of at least some of the computers in the embassy. It seems rational to me that embassy personnel (whether they be security personnel or the diplomatic personnel) would need access to sensitive material, and computers are the most likely way to not only transmit that information, but also to protect it.
I would be more concerned about encryption codes (protecting that sensitive information) eventually being broken due to the computer access rather than the sensitive information itself. That's likely much more of a problem, in my opinion.
I would be shocked if the state department didn't have a method to destroy sensitive information and computers in far flung places from Washington.
BigBallinStalin wrote:Phatscotty wrote:BigBallinStalin wrote:Why do Americans protest so little?
Is it because of the government goodies?
Is it because of the education? The nationalism?
Secularism is a part of it... Religion and it's use and abuse to control people actions and warp their minds is at the root of the protests in 21 countries, specifically all across to Middle East (not to paint with too broad a brush)
So, all secular countries have people which protest less?
I'm not sure secularism matters. We've got a lot of religious people in the US, but you don't see them protesting in the droves.
France protests a lot, and those protestors are predominantly not Muslim... Oh, but they're Christians, so shall we blame that on religion or something else like unions?
Users browsing this forum: ConfederateSS