Moderator: Community Team
bedub1 wrote:Are there groups of people you think are above criticism? Is it not OK to criticize certain people?
It looks like the Saudi King wants to make Islam above criticism. Do you think this is right? Are there other groups that should be included in here? Other religions? Races?
http://www.france24.com/en/20121027-sau ... us-insults
PLAYER57832 wrote:About the only people I don't criticize, if warranted are the mentally disabled.
Woodruff wrote:bedub1 wrote:Are there groups of people you think are above criticism? Is it not OK to criticize certain people?
It looks like the Saudi King wants to make Islam above criticism. Do you think this is right? Are there other groups that should be included in here? Other religions? Races?
http://www.france24.com/en/20121027-sau ... us-insults
I cannot think of any group that is above criticism. The idea doesn't even make sense to me.
bedub1 wrote:Woodruff wrote:bedub1 wrote:Are there groups of people you think are above criticism? Is it not OK to criticize certain people?
It looks like the Saudi King wants to make Islam above criticism. Do you think this is right? Are there other groups that should be included in here? Other religions? Races?
http://www.france24.com/en/20121027-sau ... us-insults
I cannot think of any group that is above criticism. The idea doesn't even make sense to me.
So it's okay to criticize Islam? You disagree with the Saudi King?
natty_dread wrote:Do ponies have sex?
(proud member of the Occasionally Wrongly Banned)Army of GOD wrote:the term heterosexual is offensive. I prefer to be called "normal"
2dimes wrote:Fine but don't you dare criticize a huge asshole for being mentally challenged.
ManBungalow wrote:Members of the fungus kingdom.
PLAYER57832 wrote:About the only people I don't criticize, if warranted are the mentally disabled.
Other than that, plenty of people never EARN criticism, at least in my presence. However, they are not "excluded".
bedub1 wrote:Are there groups of people you think are above criticism? Is it not OK to criticize certain people?
It looks like the Saudi King wants to make Islam above criticism. Do you think this is right? Are there other groups that should be included in here? Other religions? Races?
http://www.france24.com/en/20121027-sau ... us-insults
Pack Rat wrote:if it quacks like a duck and walk like a duck, it's still fascism
viewtopic.php?f=8&t=241668&start=200#p5349880
chang50 wrote:PLAYER57832 wrote:About the only people I don't criticize, if warranted are the mentally disabled.
Other than that, plenty of people never EARN criticism, at least in my presence. However, they are not "excluded".
Not sure why the mentally disabled are more exempt than say the physically disabled.Allied to this I've always wondered why it's generally accepted that we can laugh at the physically clumsy when they struggle with mundane tasks but it is taboo to laugh at someone struggling to read or write.
Certainly speculation and opinion about the true nature of reality,which includes Islam,should not be above reasonable and intelligent criticism.
Funkyterrance wrote:chang50 wrote:PLAYER57832 wrote:About the only people I don't criticize, if warranted are the mentally disabled.
Other than that, plenty of people never EARN criticism, at least in my presence. However, they are not "excluded".
Not sure why the mentally disabled are more exempt than say the physically disabled.Allied to this I've always wondered why it's generally accepted that we can laugh at the physically clumsy when they struggle with mundane tasks but it is taboo to laugh at someone struggling to read or write.
Certainly speculation and opinion about the true nature of reality,which includes Islam,should not be above reasonable and intelligent criticism.
Many, many people love to criticize the mentally disabled, just not publicly as it's not politically correct. It makes themselves feel more intelligent while there is in fact no correlation(irony?). I should say it's pretty common that someone would criticize anyone whom they feel is mentally inferior, this includes the "mentally disabled". Besides, where do you draw the line? (this is akin to chang's quoted part about the physically clumsy). I know a person who is constantly referring to others as "stupid" but if anyone brings up the subject of mentally disabled people in any sort of critical manner he gets extremely offended because he has a very personal history regarding one. It always irks me, either way.
If I would to pick a group I would say mothers. Unless you're obviously joking and know the person really well, criticizing someone's mum is really low class.
john9blue wrote:nobody. why should i shy away from critical thought?
if (for example) a mentally disabled person is a huge asshole, then i'm going to criticize them for it.
chang50 wrote:
The klutz is nearly universally ridiculed where the simpleton is often sympathised with,and their feelings spared.
Funkyterrance wrote:chang50 wrote:
The klutz is nearly universally ridiculed where the simpleton is often sympathised with,and their feelings spared.
Really? You'd never know from these forums.![]()
It's a good point you have about clutzes but I do still think there is a pretty good similarity between a clutz and someone who is just a little slow on the uptake. When someone is awkward in their own body it's generally considered "not nice" to make fun of them for it so there is at least a little frowning upon this sort of criticism. Admittedly this sort of criticism is probably slightly more politically correct. I'm not sure why though. I feel that there is equal opportunity to get impatient with either handicap.
PLAYER57832 wrote:About the only people I don't criticize, if warranted are the mentally disabled.
Funkyterrance wrote:criticizing someone's mum is really low class.
jimboston wrote:PLAYER57832 wrote:About the only people I don't criticize, if warranted are the mentally disabled.
You mean I'm not allowed to criticize you?
(in before someone points out that I'm being an ass again.)
Users browsing this forum: No registered users