Conquer Club

Church of England stays classy

\\OFF-TOPIC// conversations about everything that has nothing to do with Conquer Club.

Moderator: Community Team

Forum rules
Please read the Community Guidelines before posting.

Re: Church of England stays classy

Postby Symmetry on Thu Nov 22, 2012 8:14 pm

The Church of England has female ministers. Here's a list of the first 32 women ordained as priests in the Church of England:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_the_first_32_women_ordained_as_Church_of_England_priests

Are we done with the ridiculous claims yet?
the world is in greater peril from those who tolerate or encourage evil than from those who actually commit it- Albert Einstein
User avatar
Sergeant Symmetry
 
Posts: 9255
Joined: Sat Feb 24, 2007 5:49 am

Re:

Postby tzor on Thu Nov 22, 2012 9:44 pm

2dimes wrote:There isn't enough women driving boats. When are we going to address that?


"Dirving boats?" I'll assume you meant that literally. Chesapeake woman takes role on sub, Navy history.

Because everyone knows a "boat" is a submarine and everything else is a "ship."
Image
User avatar
Cadet tzor
 
Posts: 4076
Joined: Thu Feb 22, 2007 9:43 pm
Location: Long Island, NY, USA

Re: Church of England stays classy

Postby Haggis_McMutton on Fri Nov 23, 2012 5:50 am

Iliad wrote:
Phatscotty wrote:
notyou2 wrote:
Phatscotty wrote:
nagerous wrote:No opinions on this blatant act of misogyny by the Protestant church (supposedly the more liberal ones amirite?) in the 21st century pushing back decades of reform attempting to create a more equal society?


What is the evidence that making women bishops is the right thing to do?



In general, more empathy, which I hear is a Christian value.


Sure it is, but that does not mean that there aren't certain jobs or subjects or positions that are meant for men, or that are meant for women, or that men/women are generally better/worse at.

For example: Prison guards. Another, waitresses at hooters

Explain how women are less capable of being priests or ministers. I'm all ears.


Well, historically speaking, god seems to prefer speaking through men, so it does seem reasonable.
I wouldn't want my priest to be part of a demographic that god isn't particularly fond of, would I?
Highest score: 3063; Highest position: 67;
Winner of {World War II tournament, -team 2010 Skilled Diversity, [FuN||Chewy]-[XII] USA};
8-3-7
User avatar
Major Haggis_McMutton
 
Posts: 403
Joined: Sun Mar 26, 2006 11:32 am

Re: Church of England stays classy

Postby Iliad on Fri Nov 23, 2012 6:34 am

Phatscotty wrote:
Iliad wrote:
Phatscotty wrote:
notyou2 wrote:
Phatscotty wrote:
nagerous wrote:No opinions on this blatant act of misogyny by the Protestant church (supposedly the more liberal ones amirite?) in the 21st century pushing back decades of reform attempting to create a more equal society?


What is the evidence that making women bishops is the right thing to do?



In general, more empathy, which I hear is a Christian value.


Sure it is, but that does not mean that there aren't certain jobs or subjects or positions that are meant for men, or that are meant for women, or that men/women are generally better/worse at.

For example: Prison guards. Another, waitresses at hooters

Explain how women are less capable of being priests or ministers. I'm all ears.


I'm not saying that. The Church is, and I don't even know if that is the reason they give.
You were still defending them, and claiming that there are roles "meant" for men and others "meant" for women. Which is precisely the attitude and antiquated gender roles people are trying to overturn. Welcome to the 21st century.

Why can't women be bishops scotty?
User avatar
Private 1st Class Iliad
 
Posts: 10394
Joined: Mon Mar 05, 2007 12:48 am

Postby 2dimes on Fri Nov 23, 2012 9:39 am

tzor wrote:Because everyone knows a "boat"."

Never lend tzor your boat. He will take his cats out in it and possibly sink it pretending it's a submarine.
User avatar
Corporal 2dimes
 
Posts: 13098
Joined: Wed May 31, 2006 1:08 pm
Location: Pepperoni Hug Spot.

Re: Re:

Postby DoomYoshi on Fri Nov 23, 2012 11:08 am

Deletion.
Last edited by DoomYoshi on Fri Nov 23, 2012 2:02 pm, edited 1 time in total.
░▒▒▓▓▓▒▒░
User avatar
Captain DoomYoshi
 
Posts: 10728
Joined: Tue Nov 16, 2010 9:30 pm
Location: Niu York, Ukraine

Re: Re:

Postby DoomYoshi on Fri Nov 23, 2012 11:09 am

tzor wrote:
2dimes wrote:There isn't enough women driving boats. When are we going to address that?


"Dirving boats?" I'll assume you meant that literally. Chesapeake woman takes role on sub, Navy history.

Because everyone knows a "boat" is a submarine and everything else is a "ship."


Everything else?

Like these things:

Image

Image

Image

Image

Image

Image

Image

Image

This is truly epic. Who could imagine that all these things - both in water and out, are all ships. I guess female bishops are "ships" too.

The great thing is that now we know that whoever has the biggest collection of "things" (not counting submarines as a thing) has the most ships and therefore the largest navy. Since fat people have more atoms in their body (more things) they have larger navies. CC should award free points to fat people.
░▒▒▓▓▓▒▒░
User avatar
Captain DoomYoshi
 
Posts: 10728
Joined: Tue Nov 16, 2010 9:30 pm
Location: Niu York, Ukraine

Re: Re:

Postby tzor on Fri Nov 23, 2012 11:58 am

DoomYoshi wrote:
tzor wrote:
2dimes wrote:There isn't enough women driving boats. When are we going to address that?


"Dirving boats?" I'll assume you meant that literally. Chesapeake woman takes role on sub, Navy history.

Because everyone knows a "boat" is a submarine and everything else is a "ship."


Everything else?


Well crap can be boats, but they aren't generally not worth mentioning. If you want a more formal definition of not worth being called a ship ... here is the Wikipedia definition.

A boat is a watercraft of any size designed to float or plane, to provide passage across water. Usually this water will be inland (lakes) or in protected coastal areas. However, boats such as the whaleboat were designed to be operated from a ship in an offshore environment. In naval terms, a boat is a vessel small enough to be carried aboard another vessel (a ship). Another less restrictive definition is a vessel that can be lifted out of the water. Strictly speaking and uniquely a submarine is a boat as defined by the Royal Navy. Some boats too large for the naval definition include the Great Lakes freighter, riverboat, narrow boat and ferryboat. The term armed boat, used primarily by English speaking naval forces, referred to any boat carrying either a cannon or armed occupants, such as marines.


So are we talking tankers, ocean liners, and aircraft carriers, or are we talking oversized guitars on a lake? Because I don't think the later is a good description for the office of bishop. Hell, even a pastor deserves a proper "ship."
Image
User avatar
Cadet tzor
 
Posts: 4076
Joined: Thu Feb 22, 2007 9:43 pm
Location: Long Island, NY, USA

Re: Church of England stays classy

Postby DoomYoshi on Fri Nov 23, 2012 2:04 pm

Big ships carry little ships on their backs despite them
Little ships carry little boats and so ad infinitum.

In any case, if the definition you posted says that everything else isn't a ship, why would you post that? Were you just lying to us? If a submarine has aircraft in it, is it a ship then?
░▒▒▓▓▓▒▒░
User avatar
Captain DoomYoshi
 
Posts: 10728
Joined: Tue Nov 16, 2010 9:30 pm
Location: Niu York, Ukraine

Re: Church of England stays classy

Postby Phatscotty on Fri Nov 23, 2012 11:18 pm

Iliad wrote:
Phatscotty wrote:
Iliad wrote:
Phatscotty wrote:
notyou2 wrote:
Phatscotty wrote:
What is the evidence that making women bishops is the right thing to do?



In general, more empathy, which I hear is a Christian value.


Sure it is, but that does not mean that there aren't certain jobs or subjects or positions that are meant for men, or that are meant for women, or that men/women are generally better/worse at.

For example: Prison guards. Another, waitresses at hooters

Explain how women are less capable of being priests or ministers. I'm all ears.


I'm not saying that. The Church is, and I don't even know if that is the reason they give.
You were still defending them, and claiming that there are roles "meant" for men and others "meant" for women. Which is precisely the attitude and antiquated gender roles people are trying to overturn. Welcome to the 21st century.

Why can't women be bishops scotty?


I have no idea for their reasons (already stated). I just find is fascinating that you guys think you are going to tell the church what is right and what is wrong.
User avatar
Major Phatscotty
 
Posts: 3714
Joined: Mon Dec 10, 2007 5:50 pm

Re: Church of England stays classy

Postby crispybits on Sat Nov 24, 2012 4:39 am

Why? A minority in the Church have been telling everyone else what is right and wrong for years. Any small group of people putting forward moral expectations of any larger group of people is just following their example.

Only difference is that this time it's being done with the backing of well developed and mature sociological arguments instead of "God said so. Derp"
User avatar
Major crispybits
 
Posts: 942
Joined: Sun Feb 05, 2012 4:29 pm

Previous

Return to Acceptable Content

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: mookiemcgee