Moderator: Community Team
Metsfanmax wrote:I saw it last night, and I was thoroughly entertained above my expectations (I didn't particularly enjoy the LOTR films). I didn't initially have high regard for the decision to make it into three films, but now that I see what they were able to do in three hours, I understand the decision.
jimboston wrote:Metsfanmax wrote:I saw it last night, and I was thoroughly entertained above my expectations (I didn't particularly enjoy the LOTR films). I didn't initially have high regard for the decision to make it into three films, but now that I see what they were able to do in three hours, I understand the decision.
I saw it yesterday.
(I opt'd for 2D. I don't mind 3D, but perfer it for high0speed action stuff like Iron Man or things like that.)
I was entertained... and I can see how it's possible to make it into 3 movies.
That said... I don't think they should have done that.
It'd be fine as 2 movies. Some of the scenes they play out much longer than necessary... trying to give an idea of scale / scope... and I don't think it's necessary.
I also think that they should have intermissions in any movies longer than 2 hours. Yes... the theaters would show less movies... but I think they would sell more food/snacks. I had to leave to take a pee about an hour into the film... had there been a planned intermission I would have held it; and then I would have grabbed another drink and some snack or something. As it was I just took the leak and ran back into the film... no time for getting another snack.
jimboston wrote:I also think that they should have intermissions in any movies longer than 2 hours. Yes... the theaters would show less movies... but I think they would sell more food/snacks. I had to leave to take a pee about an hour into the film... had there been a planned intermission I would have held it; and then I would have grabbed another drink and some snack or something. As it was I just took the leak and ran back into the film... no time for getting another snack.
crispybits wrote:Hobbits are only between two and four feet tall
Jesus was a normal sized human (so five or six feet)
Therefore Jesus > Hobbits
Users browsing this forum: Dukasaur