Dukasaur wrote:BigBallinStalin wrote:So don't express irritation when Zionist figures are promoted higher than classical liberal figures such as Jefferson? Okay.
That's not the issue and you know it. Nothing wrong with being irritated about someone renaming your favourite library. The hate speech is in the clauses
he gave the Israelis more than they deserved, they got greedy and took the West Bank and Gaza anyways
. These were not integral to his message anyway; they were added gratuitously to create a negative emotional response in others.
1. The Israelis do not deserve this honor (implied: Thomas Jefferson deserves it more.)
That's not hate speech.
2. The Israelis got greedy and took the WB and Gaza anyway.
Their intent is unknown (but we all make claims about people's intents--just like you're doing now, but we also do this will Big Wall Street Fat Cats and Politicians), so either be consistent and argue that we should all be banned for 'hate' speech, or drop your groundless charges.
Finally, the Israelis taking Gaza and WB is relevant because aggressive nations which seek to expand their control over land that isn't theirs do not deserve honorable mentions--according to OP. There's nothing wrong with that claim--in the sense that it cannot be called 'hate speech'.
How can we revoke the honor to a classical liberal like Thomas Jefferson and reward an aggressive nation with it? OP says, No, and mentions a few reasons (Israelis being greedy and taking the WB and Gaza). Somehow, that's hate speech?
No, it isn't, nor is it trolling.