Moderator: Community Team
jay_a2j wrote:hey if any1 would like me to make them a signature or like an avator just let me no, my sig below i did, and i also did "panther 88" so i can do something like that for u if ud like...
Napoleon Ier wrote:You people need to grow up to be honest.
Juan_Bottom wrote:Or all these gun nuts could actually do the sh*t they say they need their guns for.
AMIRITE, WORLD?
Lil_SlimShady wrote:Juan_Bottom wrote:Or all these gun nuts could actually do the sh*t they say they need their guns for.
AMIRITE, WORLD?
So we kill off the 1% and divide their wealth how? Evenly? I dont' think so.
That only leads to one thing - anarchy
Lil_SlimShady wrote:The cause of the problem is actually very simple - the lack of FINANCIAL education that is provided by the educational system to the entire population. The top 1% prodigies are taught from a very early age the importance of saving money, investing, increasing your assets, and controlling your liabilities. They know how to make money work for them while the rest of us are working for the money. I spent 13 years in pre-university education (due to immigration I had to stay one year behind) and I did not learn the true meaning of the words "libilities" till I went to business school. Even after the 2008 fiasco so many people continue to think that their home is an asset! I hate to put the inequality issue onto the shoulders of teachers, who are a major victim in this issue, but they have got to start teaching practical knowledge (outside of trades) alongside the theoretical. If this will begin to happen, if the middle class kids have a similar financial education as the rich kids, then over the next few decades they will grab onto more of the wealth and eventually even out. Taxing the 1% higher is a very short term solution. They will adapt, they will find investments to walk around the taxes, and no matter how many times you re-write the tax code they will stay ahead of the game as long as the middle class remains financially uneducated. We have to learn, and teach our kids, how to play at their own game. If we can't join them (and we wont be able to no matter the legislation) then beat them.
BigBallinStalin wrote:Lil_SlimShady wrote:The cause of the problem is actually very simple - the lack of FINANCIAL education that is provided by the educational system to the entire population. The top 1% prodigies are taught from a very early age the importance of saving money, investing, increasing your assets, and controlling your liabilities. They know how to make money work for them while the rest of us are working for the money. I spent 13 years in pre-university education (due to immigration I had to stay one year behind) and I did not learn the true meaning of the words "libilities" till I went to business school. Even after the 2008 fiasco so many people continue to think that their home is an asset! I hate to put the inequality issue onto the shoulders of teachers, who are a major victim in this issue, but they have got to start teaching practical knowledge (outside of trades) alongside the theoretical. If this will begin to happen, if the middle class kids have a similar financial education as the rich kids, then over the next few decades they will grab onto more of the wealth and eventually even out. Taxing the 1% higher is a very short term solution. They will adapt, they will find investments to walk around the taxes, and no matter how many times you re-write the tax code they will stay ahead of the game as long as the middle class remains financially uneducated. We have to learn, and teach our kids, how to play at their own game. If we can't join them (and we wont be able to no matter the legislation) then beat them.
RE: education, I agree, but do most public and private schools offer such classes? Not sure.
stahrgazer wrote:Lil_SlimShady wrote:Juan_Bottom wrote:Or all these gun nuts could actually do the sh*t they say they need their guns for.
AMIRITE, WORLD?
So we kill off the 1% and divide their wealth how? Evenly? I dont' think so.
That only leads to one thing - anarchy
I guess you could ask post-Castro-takeover Cubans whether it works, though. I mean, basically, that's what the Cuban revolution was about.
(I'm not Cuban and not privy to the thoughts of those Cubans still in Cuba, but rumor has it that Castro's revolution simply changed "who's on top," and supposedly continues to use a little more force to ensure those currently on top stay there.)
Users browsing this forum: jonesthecurl