Moderator: Community Team
natty_dread wrote:Do ponies have sex?
(proud member of the Occasionally Wrongly Banned)Army of GOD wrote:the term heterosexual is offensive. I prefer to be called "normal"
natty_dread wrote:Do ponies have sex?
(proud member of the Occasionally Wrongly Banned)Army of GOD wrote:the term heterosexual is offensive. I prefer to be called "normal"
john9blue wrote:i know why "toe" makes more sense, man.
just saying that it doesn't make sense to use it if less people are going to understand it.
Symmetry wrote:john9blue wrote:i know why "toe" makes more sense, man.
just saying that it doesn't make sense to use it if less people are going to understand it.
"Fewer" people.
nietzsche wrote:Symmetry wrote:john9blue wrote:i know why "toe" makes more sense, man.
just saying that it doesn't make sense to use it if less people are going to understand it.
"Fewer" people.
john is going to kick your ass symmetry, he's hardcore.
Symmetry wrote:john9blue wrote:i know why "toe" makes more sense, man.
just saying that it doesn't make sense to use it if less people are going to understand it.
"Fewer" people.
nietzsche wrote:john is going to kick your ass symmetry, he's hardcore.
natty_dread wrote:Do ponies have sex?
(proud member of the Occasionally Wrongly Banned)Army of GOD wrote:the term heterosexual is offensive. I prefer to be called "normal"
john9blue wrote:i know why "toe" makes more sense, man.
just saying that it doesn't make sense to use it if less people are going to understand it.
john9blue wrote: so why use "toe"? because some dude at oxford tells me to? pfft... appeal to authority much?
john9blue wrote:here's an expression that i apparently misused a while ago:
https://www.google.com/webhp?hl=en&tab= ... _qf.&cad=b
https://www.google.com/webhp?hl=en&tab= ... 00&bih=756
given that more people believe the phrase is "tow the party line" than "toe the party line", has "toe" become incorrect?
if i wish for my communication to be understood by as many as possible, shouldn't i use "tow"?
people who understand "toe the line" will understand "tow the line", but not necessarily the other way around. so why use "toe"? because some dude at oxford tells me to? pfft... appeal to authority much?
aage wrote:Actually it seems rather silly to hold contemporary Americans responsible for their language. It's not like they all got together one Saturday afternoon on the event "How To Annoy The British" and decided to cut out the u because it's shorter.
That's almost like blaming the Arabs that they're not Christians.
ooge wrote:I would not suggest any American using the British word for cigarette. and anyways there are what? at least six different forms of English in the UK.
chang50 wrote:ooge wrote:I would not suggest any American using the British word for cigarette. and anyways there are what? at least six different forms of English in the UK.
Thats a conservative estimate,it would be equally unwise for any Brit to use a common American word for one's backside...
Army of GOD wrote:Whenever people use "good" instead of "well" I feel physical pain.
Lootifer wrote:Army of GOD wrote:Whenever people use "good" instead of "well" I feel physical pain.
Sarcasm doesnt suit you.
Timminz wrote:keiths31 wrote:aage wrote:
Same thing, 5 month later by an American. Apparently they do care.
An Alanis reference 20 years too late...is quite lame.
Oddly enough, it is rather ironic for someone to write a song titled "Ironic" without knowing what the word means.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users