Symmetry wrote:UPDATE: Scotty now claims Tea Party not conservative enough.
I didn't see anywhere where Phatscotty claimed such a thing.
Moderator: Community Team
Symmetry wrote:UPDATE: Scotty now claims Tea Party not conservative enough.
Night Strike wrote:ooge wrote:http://money.cnn.com/2013/05/14/news/economy/deficits-falling/index.html
Happens when Congress no longer gives Obama a blank check and when the economy has a little bit of improvement to it. However, I'd expect the economic improvement to come to a streaking halt by this time next year due to Obamacare.
Night Strike wrote:Woodruff wrote:MegaProphet wrote:Night Strike wrote:Typical hit-piece from the pro-abortion groups. Crisis pregnancy centers exist to actually help women who have an unexpected pregnancy and don't have the means to help themselves with medical care, counseling, and after-birth care. They don't exist to provide abortions, which is why the pro-abortion lobbies have such a problem with them.
And your OP has nothing to do with conservatism in the USA; it has to do with disliking groups that oppose abortion.
I don't know where you got the idea that harassing pregnant women is helping them
Because Night Strike and those like him know what those women need better than those women do. Duh.
Nope, I've never believed that
Night Strike wrote:which is why I'm strictly opposed to Obamacare, which is purely government involvement in health care decisions of all people.
Night Strike wrote:Abortion has never been about a woman's choice
Night Strike wrote:it's about the unborn child being its own being and having its own right to life that is guaranteed to all. No person's right to choose extends to having the right to take away the life of another.
ooge wrote:Phatscotty wrote:Symmetry wrote:Phatscotty wrote:Symmetry wrote:How do you guys differentiate social conservatism and fiscal conservatism?
We have not had very many fiscal Conservatives in government in recent history
Erm, can I take your first thought and ask what you mean?
I mean there haven't been many Republicans at all who qualified as fiscally conservative, specifically at a Federal level.
Thanks for making my long stated argument for me,but if I had said it you would say I was incorrectly stereotyping and smearing conservatives.
Symmetry wrote:UPDATE: Scotty now claims Tea Party not conservative enough.
Phatscotty wrote:Symmetry wrote:UPDATE: Scotty now claims Tea Party not conservative enough.
It's okay. I knew before hand I was wasting my time responding honestly to your post, but I reached out anyways.
Enjoy it while it lasted. I don't get sucked into garbage troll posts anymore
ooge wrote:can anyone remember back to a time,not that long ago when republicans attitude was that deficits do not matter,that it would be better to grow the country's economy to solve whatever debt problem the country has and to achieve this taxes have to be cut.This will be the attitude again the next time there is a republican president.
Night Strike wrote:ooge wrote:can anyone remember back to a time,not that long ago when republicans attitude was that deficits do not matter,that it would be better to grow the country's economy to solve whatever debt problem the country has and to achieve this taxes have to be cut.This will be the attitude again the next time there is a republican president.
Which is precisely why conservatives are working to change the Republican party and actually hold to principles of limited government.
Night Strike wrote:ooge wrote:can anyone remember back to a time,not that long ago when republicans attitude was that deficits do not matter,that it would be better to grow the country's economy to solve whatever debt problem the country has and to achieve this taxes have to be cut.This will be the attitude again the next time there is a republican president.
Which is precisely why conservatives are working to change the Republican party and actually hold to principles of limited government.
Woodruff wrote:Night Strike wrote:ooge wrote:can anyone remember back to a time,not that long ago when republicans attitude was that deficits do not matter,that it would be better to grow the country's economy to solve whatever debt problem the country has and to achieve this taxes have to be cut.This will be the attitude again the next time there is a republican president.
Which is precisely why conservatives are working to change the Republican party and actually hold to principles of limited government.
I do sincerely hope they are successful. I don't expect it to last past the next Republican President or Republican-held Congress, unfortunately.
thegreekdog wrote:Woodruff wrote:Night Strike wrote:ooge wrote:can anyone remember back to a time,not that long ago when republicans attitude was that deficits do not matter,that it would be better to grow the country's economy to solve whatever debt problem the country has and to achieve this taxes have to be cut.This will be the attitude again the next time there is a republican president.
Which is precisely why conservatives are working to change the Republican party and actually hold to principles of limited government.
I do sincerely hope they are successful. I don't expect it to last past the next Republican President or Republican-held Congress, unfortunately.
Me neither, which is why I stopped voting for Republicans for federal office.
thegreekdog wrote:I'm hopeful, but not realistically hopeful.
Woodruff wrote:Night Strike wrote:ooge wrote:can anyone remember back to a time,not that long ago when republicans attitude was that deficits do not matter,that it would be better to grow the country's economy to solve whatever debt problem the country has and to achieve this taxes have to be cut.This will be the attitude again the next time there is a republican president.
Which is precisely why conservatives are working to change the Republican party and actually hold to principles of limited government.
I do sincerely hope they are successful. I don't expect it to last past the next Republican President or Republican-held Congress, unfortunately.
ooge wrote:Woodruff wrote:Night Strike wrote:ooge wrote:can anyone remember back to a time,not that long ago when republicans attitude was that deficits do not matter,that it would be better to grow the country's economy to solve whatever debt problem the country has and to achieve this taxes have to be cut.This will be the attitude again the next time there is a republican president.
Which is precisely why conservatives are working to change the Republican party and actually hold to principles of limited government.
I do sincerely hope they are successful. I don't expect it to last past the next Republican President or Republican-held Congress, unfortunately.
Exactly and that is why the TEA ALIENS is the same game being played again as it was with the Newt Gingrich congress under Clinton.
thegreekdog wrote:ooge wrote:Woodruff wrote:Night Strike wrote:ooge wrote:can anyone remember back to a time,not that long ago when republicans attitude was that deficits do not matter,that it would be better to grow the country's economy to solve whatever debt problem the country has and to achieve this taxes have to be cut.This will be the attitude again the next time there is a republican president.
Which is precisely why conservatives are working to change the Republican party and actually hold to principles of limited government.
I do sincerely hope they are successful. I don't expect it to last past the next Republican President or Republican-held Congress, unfortunately.
Exactly and that is why the TEA ALIENS is the same game being played again as it was with the Newt Gingrich congress under Clinton.
I agree with this theory, although the Clinton/Republican dichotomy was pretty good for the country.
Woodruff wrote:thegreekdog wrote:ooge wrote:Woodruff wrote:Night Strike wrote:ooge wrote:can anyone remember back to a time,not that long ago when republicans attitude was that deficits do not matter,that it would be better to grow the country's economy to solve whatever debt problem the country has and to achieve this taxes have to be cut.This will be the attitude again the next time there is a republican president.
Which is precisely why conservatives are working to change the Republican party and actually hold to principles of limited government.
I do sincerely hope they are successful. I don't expect it to last past the next Republican President or Republican-held Congress, unfortunately.
Exactly and that is why the TEA ALIENS is the same game being played again as it was with the Newt Gingrich congress under Clinton.
I agree with this theory, although the Clinton/Republican dichotomy was pretty good for the country.
Absolutely. And it had a much different tenor, in my opinion, than the current Obama/Republican dichotomy. Much different.
ooge wrote:Woodruff wrote:thegreekdog wrote:ooge wrote:Woodruff wrote:Night Strike wrote:Which is precisely why conservatives are working to change the Republican party and actually hold to principles of limited government.
I do sincerely hope they are successful. I don't expect it to last past the next Republican President or Republican-held Congress, unfortunately.
Exactly and that is why the TEA ALIENS is the same game being played again as it was with the Newt Gingrich congress under Clinton.
I agree with this theory, although the Clinton/Republican dichotomy was pretty good for the country.
Absolutely. And it had a much different tenor, in my opinion, than the current Obama/Republican dichotomy. Much different.
different tenor?
ooge wrote:can anyone remember back to a time,not that long ago when republicans attitude was that deficits do not matter,that it would be better to grow the country's economy to solve whatever debt problem the country has and to achieve this taxes have to be cut.This will be the attitude again the next time there is a republican president.
Woodruff wrote:Night Strike wrote:And your OP has nothing to do with conservatism in the USA
You believe that these type of centers that trick women into entering them on false pretenses are being run by liberal groups?
Phatscotty wrote:It's turning out that Conservatism in the USA is just something for Liberals to bash. Some are so consumed by their hate, that the current president can get away with anything and never be held accountable by his supporters.
Phatscotty wrote:I voted for Bush in 2000. I was very young, and I liked what he said about ending the practice of nation building. As soon as he started "building nations" I turned on him 180 degrees (explains how I went from voting for Bush to voting for Nader) and I felt lied to, and I with many other Conservatives criticized him exactly as much as I do Obama now. Where are all the Democrats like that? Are there any?
Phatscotty wrote:There is as clear difference here between Conservatives and Liberals when it comes to being objective, holding those they voted for accountable for their promises and actions, and not drinking the kool-aid.
Dukasaur wrote:Woodruff wrote:Night Strike wrote:And your OP has nothing to do with conservatism in the USA
You believe that these type of centers that trick women into entering them on false pretenses are being run by liberal groups?
I don't think the correlation is nearly as strong as you think it to be. I know conservatives have a tendency to be against abortion, but I've met plenty who were not. Conversely, while liberals tend to be in favour of freely-available abortion, I'm met quite a few who were not.
Phatscotty wrote:ooge wrote:can anyone remember back to a time,not that long ago when republicans attitude was that deficits do not matter,that it would be better to grow the country's economy to solve whatever debt problem the country has and to achieve this taxes have to be cut.This will be the attitude again the next time there is a republican president.
Sure do. I also remember voting their asses out in the primaries.
Your post belongs in the year 2009
It's turning out that Conservatism in the USA is just something for Liberals to bash. Some are so consumed by their hate, that the current president can get away with anything and never be held accountable by his supporters.
I voted for Bush in 2000. I was very young, and I liked what he said about ending the practice of nation building. As soon as he started "building nations" I turned on him 180 degrees (explains how I went from voting for Bush to voting for Nader) and I felt lied to, and I with many other Conservatives criticized him exactly as much as I do Obama now. Where are all the Democrats like that? Are there any?
There is as clear difference here between Conservatives and Liberals when it comes to being objective, holding those they voted for accountable for their promises and actions, and not drinking the kool-aid.
ooge wrote:Phatscotty wrote:ooge wrote:can anyone remember back to a time,not that long ago when republicans attitude was that deficits do not matter,that it would be better to grow the country's economy to solve whatever debt problem the country has and to achieve this taxes have to be cut.This will be the attitude again the next time there is a republican president.
Sure do. I also remember voting their asses out in the primaries.
Your post belongs in the year 2009
It's turning out that Conservatism in the USA is just something for Liberals to bash. Some are so consumed by their hate, that the current president can get away with anything and never be held accountable by his supporters.
I voted for Bush in 2000. I was very young, and I liked what he said about ending the practice of nation building. As soon as he started "building nations" I turned on him 180 degrees (explains how I went from voting for Bush to voting for Nader) and I felt lied to, and I with many other Conservatives criticized him exactly as much as I do Obama now. Where are all the Democrats like that? Are there any?
There is as clear difference here between Conservatives and Liberals when it comes to being objective, holding those they voted for accountable for their promises and actions, and not drinking the kool-aid.
prepare yourself to being disappointed again.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users