Moderator: Community Team
warmonger1981 wrote:I seen today a group in Arizona I think, can prove Obam birth certificate is a fake. It was posted by my uncle on facebook. It was a story from a local news channel . The group set out to prove it was real but after 6 months and over 2200 hours of investigation they found that it was made from a computer. There is no paper copy and was manufactured online. They can disassemble it piece by piece. Supposedly you cant do it with a paper copy. Has anyone else seen or heard this?
AndyDufresne wrote:warmonger1981 wrote:I seen today a group in Arizona I think, can prove Obam birth certificate is a fake. It was posted by my uncle on facebook. It was a story from a local news channel . The group set out to prove it was real but after 6 months and over 2200 hours of investigation they found that it was made from a computer. There is no paper copy and was manufactured online. They can disassemble it piece by piece. Supposedly you cant do it with a paper copy. Has anyone else seen or heard this?
I've totally heard about this. I think I also heard about it from your uncle on facebook of the local news channel in Arizona. I am glad it has now been proven that it was made from a computer. Because it was made from a computer, there can be no paper copy and it was manufactured online. Disassembly piece by piece is key evidence. Computers trump paper.
--Andy
jay_a2j wrote:hey if any1 would like me to make them a signature or like an avator just let me no, my sig below i did, and i also did "panther 88" so i can do something like that for u if ud like...
warmonger1981 wrote:I seen today a group in Arizona I think, can prove Obama birth certificate is a fake.
warmonger1981 wrote:Mod edit: quote removed
jay_a2j wrote:hey if any1 would like me to make them a signature or like an avator just let me no, my sig below i did, and i also did "panther 88" so i can do something like that for u if ud like...
warmonger1981 wrote:Mod edit: quote removed
warmonger1981 wrote:Mod edit: quote removed
saxitoxin wrote:Serbia is a RUDE DUDE
may not be a PRUDE, but he's gotta 'TUDE
might not be LEWD, but he's gonna get BOOED
RUDE
BigBallinStalin wrote:Andy, I wouldn't suggest fucking a banana. It simply splits apart, and you get banana all over your hands. Be wise and use superior substitutes.
tzor wrote:Wasn't someone just mentioning how politics here is more civil than religion? Your honor, I rest my case.
Alright f*ck heads. Obviously your girlfriends. smell chum in the water. They are all coming out of the wood work like a bunch of sharks defending a loved one. I done use spell check first of all. Crispy you are a prick for trying to act all " I'm all above this guys intelligence". Andy seems to jump into other peoples shit. Go eat a banana or take the one outta your ASS. And where the f*ck did comic boy come from. Go stick your head in a superman comic.
warmonger1981 wrote:Admin Edit
Woodruff wrote:warmonger1981 wrote:Admin Edit
1. That is entirely no fun.
2. How come I never got an "admin edit"? I obviously need to upgrade my insults around here.
blakebowling wrote:Woodruff wrote:warmonger1981 wrote:Admin Edit
1. That is entirely no fun.
2. How come I never got an "admin edit"? I obviously need to upgrade my insults around here.
The post was edited because it violated the guidelines, not because I thought it'd be "fun".
blakebowling wrote:Also, you haven't gotten an admin edit because you stay within the guidelines, mostly.
jonesthecurl wrote:No, mate, you haven't.
Woodruff wrote:blakebowling wrote:Woodruff wrote:warmonger1981 wrote:Admin Edit
1. That is entirely no fun.
2. How come I never got an "admin edit"? I obviously need to upgrade my insults around here.
The post was edited because it violated the guidelines, not because I thought it'd be "fun".
Exactly. It is now entirely no fun at all! Precisely my point.blakebowling wrote:Also, you haven't gotten an admin edit because you stay within the guidelines, mostly.
That's an intriguing idea, given my history of 3-month bans...
Granted, I didn't see his post before it was edited, but I suspect I may have posted something...uh...at least marginally more inflammatory in these fora previously (resulting in one of my aforementioned 3-month bans).
Woodruff wrote:
Now I'm disappointed that I didn't see it. You may have ruined my Wednesday, you bastards!
jonesthecurl wrote:It was nastier than the thing I reposted about the sharks coming out of the woodwork.
TeeGee wrote:Woodruff wrote:blakebowling wrote:Woodruff wrote:warmonger1981 wrote:Admin Edit
1. That is entirely no fun.
2. How come I never got an "admin edit"? I obviously need to upgrade my insults around here.
The post was edited because it violated the guidelines, not because I thought it'd be "fun".
Exactly. It is now entirely no fun at all! Precisely my point.blakebowling wrote:Also, you haven't gotten an admin edit because you stay within the guidelines, mostly.
That's an intriguing idea, given my history of 3-month bans...
Granted, I didn't see his post before it was edited, but I suspect I may have posted something...uh...at least marginally more inflammatory in these fora previously (resulting in one of my aforementioned 3-month bans).
I would like to think that you are too intelligent for that, Woodruff![]()
TeeGee wrote:plus, the length of bans isn't necessarily based on your last infraction, but on your previous history
Users browsing this forum: Dukasaur