Moderator: Community Team
AndyDufresne wrote:Do people still use master nowadays to refer to those who have live-in pets?
--Andy
crispybits wrote:Gunshots were over the top - should have just pepper sprayed it or something... (they did need to do something tho, the dog was attacking by the looks of it)
AndyDufresne wrote:Do people still use master nowadays to refer to those who have live-in pets?
--Andy
puppydog85 wrote:crispybits wrote:Gunshots were over the top - should have just pepper sprayed it or something... (they did need to do something tho, the dog was attacking by the looks of it)
Does pepper spray work on a dog? Or does it just get them more upset?
crispybits wrote:puppydog85 wrote:crispybits wrote:Gunshots were over the top - should have just pepper sprayed it or something... (they did need to do something tho, the dog was attacking by the looks of it)
Does pepper spray work on a dog? Or does it just get them more upset?
It works the same as it works on humans - the dog might go beserk but if it cant see you then it's unlikely it will be able to hurt you if you have your wits about you and police self defence training...
Pack Rat wrote:if it quacks like a duck and walk like a duck, it's still fascism
viewtopic.php?f=8&t=241668&start=200#p5349880
riskllama wrote:Koolbak wins this thread.
laughingcavalier wrote:Is it against the law to take photos in the US?
jonesthecurl wrote:I didn't have sound on - what did they arrest the guy for?
Pack Rat wrote:if it quacks like a duck and walk like a duck, it's still fascism
viewtopic.php?f=8&t=241668&start=200#p5349880
Maxleod wrote:Not strike, he's the only one with a functioning brain.
Maxleod wrote:Not strike, he's the only one with a functioning brain.
jonesthecurl wrote:Why the cuffs then?
U.S. District Court, Maine District wrote:Officers may take necessary steps to protect themselves if the circumstances reasonably warrant such measures without transforming a Terry stop into an arrest. This includes drawing weapons when reasonable, such as when officers are faced with a report of an armed threat. The First Circuit has also allowed the reasonable use of handcuffs and backup officers as the situation requires.
However, the transport of a suspect from the scene of the stop, particularly to a police station, has been held to turn a Terry stop into an arrest requiring probable cause.
http://scholar.google.com/scholar_case? ... as_sdt=2,4
Pack Rat wrote:if it quacks like a duck and walk like a duck, it's still fascism
viewtopic.php?f=8&t=241668&start=200#p5349880
waauw wrote:
What do you guys think? Was this self-defense or a cop going out of boundary?
puppydog85 wrote:crispybits wrote:Gunshots were over the top - should have just pepper sprayed it or something... (they did need to do something tho, the dog was attacking by the looks of it)
Does pepper spray work on a dog? Or does it just get them more upset?
notyou2 wrote:Dogs have masters. Cats have staff.
TA1LGUNN3R wrote:waauw wrote:
What do you guys think? Was this self-defense or a cop going out of boundary?
I've never been a fan of cops. They were not justified in doing the Terry stop on the owner imo. However, I believe he was justified in killing the dog. The owner was irresponsible for not securing the animal, and it was obviously a large dog with the potential to cause some harm.
-TG
Users browsing this forum: DirtyDishSoap