Conquer Club

New Policy #396 - Argumentum via Conflictus

\\OFF-TOPIC// conversations about everything that has nothing to do with Conquer Club.

Moderator: Community Team

Forum rules
Please read the Community Guidelines before posting.

New Policy #396 - Argumentum via Conflictus

Postby BigBallinStalin on Mon Jul 22, 2013 5:29 pm

Whenever you've reached an "Agree to Disagree" position with someone,
both parties must immediately fighting a 1v1 to settle the issue--forever
(or until new data is introduced!--haha, lolol!).
User avatar
Major BigBallinStalin
 
Posts: 5151
Joined: Sun Oct 26, 2008 10:23 pm
Location: crying into the dregs of an empty bottle of own-brand scotch on the toilet having a dump in Dagenham

Re: New Policy #396 - Argumentum via Conflictus

Postby Evil Semp on Mon Jul 22, 2013 5:33 pm

I agree to disagree on how to settle this issue.
Image
User avatar
Sergeant 1st Class Evil Semp
Multi Hunter
Multi Hunter
 
Posts: 8451
Joined: Sun Jul 02, 2006 8:50 pm

Re: New Policy #396 - Argumentum via Conflictus

Postby patches70 on Mon Jul 22, 2013 6:12 pm

That's not a bad idea. PS and Woodruff would have about 50 games going at one time. It might be hard to remember which game corresponds with which argument though. Is there a way to name the game specific to the argument in question that is being decided?

What about freebies who have multiple disagreements but can only have 4 games going at a time? Are additional argument resolution fights put on hold on a first come first fought basis? Does this policy only apply to OT, or also to the rest of the forum as well? I agree that BBS should use his copious free time to keep track of all arguments in all forums on all topics. After all, there can be multiple arguments in a single thread. Someone has to keep track.
Private patches70
 
Posts: 1664
Joined: Sun Aug 29, 2010 12:44 pm

Re: New Policy #396 - Argumentum via Conflictus

Postby BigBallinStalin on Mon Jul 22, 2013 6:28 pm

patches70 wrote:That's not a bad idea. PS and Woodruff would have about 50 games going at one time. It might be hard to remember which game corresponds with which argument though. Is there a way to name the game specific to the argument in question that is being decided?

What about freebies who have multiple disagreements but can only have 4 games going at a time? Are additional argument resolution fights put on hold on a first come first fought basis? Does this policy only apply to OT, or also to the rest of the forum as well? I agree that BBS should use his copious free time to keep track of all arguments in all forums on all topics. After all, there can be multiple arguments in a single thread. Someone has to keep track.


That reminds me: "Argumentum de Fisticuffs," but it wasn't Latin enough.

You know what I mean, my Latin peoples?
User avatar
Major BigBallinStalin
 
Posts: 5151
Joined: Sun Oct 26, 2008 10:23 pm
Location: crying into the dregs of an empty bottle of own-brand scotch on the toilet having a dump in Dagenham

Re: New Policy #396 - Argumentum via Conflictus

Postby Evil Semp on Mon Jul 22, 2013 7:20 pm

Image

Do you agree? Dices at DAWN!!!!!!!!
Image
User avatar
Sergeant 1st Class Evil Semp
Multi Hunter
Multi Hunter
 
Posts: 8451
Joined: Sun Jul 02, 2006 8:50 pm

Re: New Policy #396 - Argumentum via Conflictus

Postby DoomYoshi on Mon Jul 22, 2013 8:35 pm

Well, this is pretty much the only chance I will ever have to share my favorite song.



DICES AT NOON would be better.
░▒▒▓▓▓▒▒░
User avatar
Captain DoomYoshi
 
Posts: 10728
Joined: Tue Nov 16, 2010 9:30 pm
Location: Niu York, Ukraine

Re: New Policy #396 - Argumentum via Conflictus

Postby BigBallinStalin on Tue Jul 23, 2013 4:29 am

Evil Semp wrote:Image

Do you agree? Dices at DAWN!!!!!!!!



Why don't you say that to my face?!
User avatar
Major BigBallinStalin
 
Posts: 5151
Joined: Sun Oct 26, 2008 10:23 pm
Location: crying into the dregs of an empty bottle of own-brand scotch on the toilet having a dump in Dagenham


Return to Acceptable Content

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users