Lindax wrote:nàme wrote:BigBallinStalin wrote:nàme wrote:Humans are inherently bad. When they do help someone, it's not purely to be helpful. Possibly it's to make themselves look good to a friend, or even as a bartering chip for a favour later in life. Sometimes, it would be so they could satisfy themselves when they felt like they needed to do some good. The only people who will ever do something purely for the benefit of others is when they are ignorant to the situation.
So feeling an urge to do good for others is bad if the act is mutually beneficial?
Not at all. You can't just donate to charity and tell everyone you did it. You're not donating to help the cause, you're donating to make yourself look like a saint.
Or lets say someone is feeling bad for something they did and they help an old man cross the street. Again, it's just to make you hate yourself less. It wasn't to help him cross a street.
Are you just looking for reactions or are you really that narrow-minded?
There are always two sides to a story, an action, a decision, etc.
Lx
Benefits can show as godly/holy values, can show in very concrete and visible.
Point is, everyone does everything for a reason.
Doing good then what reason wud that be why we do good ?
Donation we can make to have our interests over what we are donating for, or may have a very holy side of benefit we may have to be our reason.
So, my point is not to have the definition of the exact benefit what it may be, but my point is if there is a good we do, we do it for some reason for some benefit and as stated that benefit might show in many ways.
This is said, i would like to state it that selfnessless/alturism is an utopia imo, a term in litreture/theory but no chance of life in practice.