Lootifer wrote:Nobunaga wrote:Lootifer wrote:Ok again you are picking apart the syllabus not standardisation, but thats ok (i.e. I give up).
To play the devils advocate (and I only read her speech, didnt listen to it as I dont have sound at work), this seems to be making a mountain out of a molehill, or a persepctive thing.
As far as I can remember the single MOST IMPORTANT thing about maths, and subsequently getting good marks, was showing how you got to your answer. This isnt something new, this is just a slightly different interpretation of the content of math tests and exams since the dawn of time: "What is ..... ..... .....? (please show your working)".
I just helped my son with his math homework.
They no longer teach this style:
567
x 4
-----
2268
Now it looks like this:
567
x 4
------
2000
240
+ 28
---------
2268
How did you calculate the bolded? Becuase the only real option of than partial products is by rote/memory. Which is actually not ideal when learning math, you want the students to understand the logic/process involved, not just recalling from memory that 6 time 7 is 42 (which is undoubtedly useful, but will only get you so far). Rote learning math is like using equations to model Shakespear. Square peg circle hole.
Write down 8, carry over the 2, (4x6=24 PLUS 2), etc.
BAM. I'm a Genuis!!!