Dukasaur wrote:It's much more difficult to take your posts seriously since you changed your avatar to Justin Timberlake.
ITS NOT FUCKING JUSTIN TIMBERLAKE - ITS ME
Moderator: Community Team
Dukasaur wrote:It's much more difficult to take your posts seriously since you changed your avatar to Justin Timberlake.
Pack Rat wrote:if it quacks like a duck and walk like a duck, it's still fascism
viewtopic.php?f=8&t=241668&start=200#p5349880
mrswdk wrote:Minus a few billion dollars of potential GDP and an extra 800,000 unemployed.
saxitoxin wrote:Dukasaur wrote:It's much more difficult to take your posts seriously since you changed your avatar to Justin Timberlake.
ITS NOT FUCKING JUSTIN TIMBERLAKE - ITS ME
Army of GOD wrote:thegreekdog wrote:From the Book of PimpdavidAnd verily did the Anti-Tea Party Death Squad Task Force leader say unto them: Behold, thou shalt work against the Tea Party. Because, as Rachel Maddow said unto Janine Garafolo, the tea baggers are racist and violent. It is easier to fit a camel through the head of a pin than to know the inner workings of the TPSD, but if thou showest love in thine heart for thine 99%, thou shalt triumph.
-Austin 3:16
fixed
Yale Law professor Dan M. Kahan was conducting an analysis of the scientific comprehension of various political groups when he ran into a shocking discovery: tea party supporters are slightly more scientifically literate than the non-tea party population.
When composing histograms of the scientific inference abilities of liberals and conservatives, he discovered that those who described themselves as tea party supporters came out pretty well, based on National Science Foundation standards of evaluation:
The shift to the right on the gray columns represents a positive correlation between tea party members and generally higher scientific test scores. The r=0.05 is not a drastically higher score, but the findings are statistically significant to p=.05. In other words, tea party members appear to be slightly, but solidly more scientifically literate than non-tea party members.
In fact, tea party members tend to be more scientifically literate than other self-described conservatives, who have slightly negative scores, overall. These findings should give both liberal and GOP establishment types pause over their caricatures of tea party constituents.
Remarkable was the professor’s reaction on the Yale Law “Cultural Cognition Project” website:
I’ve got to confess, though, I found this result surprising. As I pushed the button to run the analysis on my computer, I fully expected I’d be shown a modest negative correlation between identifying with the Tea Party and science comprehension.
But then again, I don’t know a single person who identifies with the Tea Party. All my impressions come from watching cable tv — & I don’t watch Fox News very often — and reading the “paper” (New York Times daily, plus a variety of politics-focused internet sites like Huffington Post & Politico).
I’m a little embarrassed, but mainly I’m just glad that I no longer hold this particular mistaken view.
Good for you, professor, for remaining open-minded. That’s what fruitful research is all about. It turns out that even the New York Times reported in 2010 that tea party supporters are wealthier and more college-educated than the general public.
A mainstream media smear campaign of ordinary citizens has convinced much of the general public that members of the tea party are uneducated, backwards dupes of big moneyed interests who do not comprehend what is going on, whether on scientific matters like manmade global warming, or on political matters like fiscal issues. Maybe they’re just ahead of the curve?
thegreekdog wrote:Army of GOD wrote:thegreekdog wrote:From the Book of PimpdavidAnd verily did the Anti-Tea Party Death Squad Task Force leader say unto them: Behold, thou shalt work against the Tea Party. Because, as Rachel Maddow said unto Janine Garafolo, the tea baggers are racist and violent. It is easier to fit a camel through the head of a pin than to know the inner workings of the TPSD, but if thou showest love in thine heart for thine 99%, thou shalt triumph.
-Austin 3:16
fixed
Lootifer wrote:Nice PS, i like how you bring stats to the table when it supports your position. Weird that you dont often use them in your other arguments...
Anyhoo, that correlation is pretty damn tenous. But does make sense because tea party supporters tend to be reasonably business savvy right? (i.e. right wing). Its generally known that the left suffer a bit more than the right from the "uninformed" population simply because that political idealogy tends to be supported by those in lower socio economic groups (where education on the whole tends to be lower).
In his fundraising email, Mr. Grayson also highlights an interview he did with the Rev. Al Sharpton, in which he said that “ordinary Americans” support President Obama and are “appalled by the tea party’s tactics.”
aage wrote: Maybe you're right, but since we receive no handlebars from the mod I think we should get some ourselves.
rishaed wrote:This is absolutely the best part though:In his fundraising email, Mr. Grayson also highlights an interview he did with the Rev. Al Sharpton, in which he said that “ordinary Americans” support President Obama and are “appalled by the tea party’s tactics.”
That guy has absolutely no credibility in my eyes. And neither does anyone willing to cite him.
thegreekdog wrote:rishaed wrote:This is absolutely the best part though:In his fundraising email, Mr. Grayson also highlights an interview he did with the Rev. Al Sharpton, in which he said that “ordinary Americans” support President Obama and are “appalled by the tea party’s tactics.”
That guy has absolutely no credibility in my eyes. And neither does anyone willing to cite him.
I just think it's weird that he's not backing down. Seems like likening a rather large and rather popular political movement to the KKK (a racist organization) is something one would want to apologize for, if only to not lose political clout and/or votes.
Phatscotty wrote:thegreekdog wrote:rishaed wrote:This is absolutely the best part though:In his fundraising email, Mr. Grayson also highlights an interview he did with the Rev. Al Sharpton, in which he said that “ordinary Americans” support President Obama and are “appalled by the tea party’s tactics.”
That guy has absolutely no credibility in my eyes. And neither does anyone willing to cite him.
I just think it's weird that he's not backing down. Seems like likening a rather large and rather popular political movement to the KKK (a racist organization) is something one would want to apologize for, if only to not lose political clout and/or votes.
The honest to God truth: Grayson made it as outrageous as possible, because he knew media and people all over the country would pick it up and repeat it. Whether it's true or not, it's being repeated over and over and over, it's on every cable news station on the hour, it will be in all kinds of editorials and the subject of talk radio show hosts and maybe, just maybe a Liberal professor will pass it on the hundreds of students, maybe 2 Liberal professors will pass it on, maybe 100's. The purpose is baseless demonization, race baiting, and reinforcing the big lie....
which displays the true brilliance: People pass the story on knowing it's crap
He knows how to steer the gutter narrative just right
jay_a2j wrote:hey if any1 would like me to make them a signature or like an avator just let me no, my sig below i did, and i also did "panther 88" so i can do something like that for u if ud like...
thegreekdog wrote:rishaed wrote:This is absolutely the best part though:In his fundraising email, Mr. Grayson also highlights an interview he did with the Rev. Al Sharpton, in which he said that “ordinary Americans” support President Obama and are “appalled by the tea party’s tactics.”
That guy has absolutely no credibility in my eyes. And neither does anyone willing to cite him.
I just think it's weird that he's not backing down. Seems like likening a rather large and rather popular political movement to the KKK (a racist organization) is something one would want to apologize for, if only to not lose political clout and/or votes.
jay_a2j wrote:hey if any1 would like me to make them a signature or like an avator just let me no, my sig below i did, and i also did "panther 88" so i can do something like that for u if ud like...
jay_a2j wrote:hey if any1 would like me to make them a signature or like an avator just let me no, my sig below i did, and i also did "panther 88" so i can do something like that for u if ud like...
Dukasaur wrote:http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jared_Lee_Loughner#Views_on_politics
Just doesn't seem very Tea Party-ish at all.
Bruceswar » Tue Aug 28, 2012 8:59 pm wrote:We all had tons of men..
Users browsing this forum: Fosteree