denominator wrote:Baron Von PWN wrote:jay_a2j wrote:Baron Von PWN wrote:It was positive because it was never an issue. Many people were ignorant of his religion until the day after the election when the papers reported on it.
Oh crap! After? Well then I guess it wasn't so positive after all if they didn't know until after!
It is positive because nobody in the know saw a reason to bring it up, for good reason, the religious affiliation of a candidate is largely irrelevant. The papers only reported on his religious beliefs after it became evident he was Canada's first Muslim mayor.
And false. We all knew he was Muslim before he was elected, the papers simply didn't report on it. It's not like it was a big secret that he's Muslim.
I have read various people online saying they didn't know, either way it speaks to it not mattering.