Moderator: Community Team
betiko wrote:Would it be ok for a 150 year old to date a 25 year old?
Metsfanmax wrote:betiko wrote:Would it be ok for a 150 year old to date a 25 year old?
No. Violates the "half your age plus seven" rule.
Pack Rat wrote:if it quacks like a duck and walk like a duck, it's still fascism
viewtopic.php?f=8&t=241668&start=200#p5349880
saxitoxin wrote:Metsfanmax wrote:betiko wrote:Would it be ok for a 150 year old to date a 25 year old?
No. Violates the "half your age plus seven" rule.
Some of us use the "zero plus eighteen" rule.
Metsfanmax wrote:saxitoxin wrote:Metsfanmax wrote:betiko wrote:Would it be ok for a 150 year old to date a 25 year old?
No. Violates the "half your age plus seven" rule.
Some of us use the "zero plus eighteen" rule.
Yes, but those of us who live in civilized parts of the country do it differently.
Pack Rat wrote:if it quacks like a duck and walk like a duck, it's still fascism
viewtopic.php?f=8&t=241668&start=200#p5349880
Metsfanmax wrote:betiko wrote:Would it be ok for a 150 year old to date a 25 year old?
No. Violates the "half your age plus seven" rule.
virus90 wrote: I think Anarkist is a valuable asset to any game.
notyou2 wrote:Metsfanmax wrote:betiko wrote:Would it be ok for a 150 year old to date a 25 year old?
No. Violates the "half your age plus seven" rule.
There are rules?????
Where would one find a list of these alleged rules?
DoomYoshi wrote:When I'm 125, I want 2 180 year olds. Therefore, it's ok.
Artimis wrote:Living up to 500 years is not as ideal as it sounds.
Also there is the impact on society that this extreme procrastination of death would have, retirement ages would skyrocket, the population would bloat. Think Torchwood: Miracle Day, but stretched over a few decades.
Artimis wrote:Living up to 500 years is not as ideal as it sounds.
Also there is the impact on society that this extreme procrastination of death would have, retirement ages would skyrocket, the population would bloat. Think Torchwood: Miracle Day, but stretched over a few decades.
riskllama wrote:Koolbak wins this thread.
Artimis wrote:Living up to 500 years is not as ideal as it sounds.
Also there is the impact on society that this extreme procrastination of death would have, retirement ages would skyrocket, the population would bloat. Think Torchwood: Miracle Day, but stretched over a few decades.
BigBallinStalin wrote:Artimis wrote:Living up to 500 years is not as ideal as it sounds.
Also there is the impact on society that this extreme procrastination of death would have, retirement ages would skyrocket, the population would bloat. Think Torchwood: Miracle Day, but stretched over a few decades.
Living for 500 years is awesome. It just depends on what you could do with that time.
If you're worried about loved ones dying and you living, then you can still have friends at the 500 Years Association.
BigBallinStalin wrote:Living for 500 years is awesome. It just depends on what you could do with that time.
If you're worried about loved ones dying and you living, then you can still have friends at the 500 Years Association.
betiko wrote:Things would self regulate. Also, there would be mortals and gods living together. Rich people would be able to have god-children. Also, just by investing 1000$ in their kid s saving account, by the interests will be huge by the time they become "teens" lol
I wonder if gods would have to behead each other to be the last man standing...
nietzsche wrote:If betiko's scenario would be still possible, I'd work my ass off the first 100 years and then live the rest having sex with 20 year old poor girls.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users