Conquer Club

But she said she was 21

\\OFF-TOPIC// conversations about everything that has nothing to do with Conquer Club.

Moderator: Community Team

Forum rules
Please read the Community Guidelines before posting.

Re: But she said she was 21

Postby thegreekdog on Mon Jan 13, 2014 9:02 am

It takes a special kind of douchebag to distribute naked pictures without permission; and it takes an even specialier kind of douchebag to distribute naked pictures of an underage person without permission.
Image
User avatar
Sergeant 1st Class thegreekdog
 
Posts: 7246
Joined: Thu Jul 17, 2008 6:55 am
Location: Philadelphia

Re: But she said she was 21

Postby AndyDufresne on Mon Jan 13, 2014 10:47 am

mrswdk wrote:inb4

Image





--Andy
User avatar
Corporal 1st Class AndyDufresne
 
Posts: 24935
Joined: Fri Mar 03, 2006 8:22 pm
Location: A Banana Palm in Zihuatanejo

Re: But she said she was 21

Postby mrswdk on Mon Jan 13, 2014 11:29 am

AndyDufresne wrote:


--Andy


Hot.
Lieutenant mrswdk
 
Posts: 14898
Joined: Sun Sep 08, 2013 10:37 am
Location: Red Swastika School

Re: But she said she was 21

Postby Army of GOD on Mon Jan 13, 2014 7:41 pm

Lootifer wrote:1) What about if we have an agreement that you wont share them?


What does it matter? Either we don't have an agreement and I share them and I'm a dick, or I do have an agreement and I share them and I'm a dick. Either way the person who is sharing them is a dick, but that just comes down to a difference in moral values. But you're the person that gave me the gun and bullets, so I place more blame on you than me (not saying either are totally blameless).

2) What if im stupid and dont realise its in my best interest to have an agreement so we dont have one, but we should?


Intelligence should have nothing to do with it. A person who gets drunk and angry and kills someone just out of drunken rage still goes to jail for killing someone. If they were smart, they wouldn't have killed someone and if you were smart, you wouldn't have given me the photos. (inb4 "that's a bad comparison")

3) What if im stupid and dont realise its in my best interest to have an agreement so we dont have one? note: you knew this before the exchange and it was the fundamental reason you asked for pics in the first place.


I'm a dick but it's either mostly your parents' fault or your fault.


4) What if the stupid person in situation 3 is also a 16 year old girl?


I've found the "at 18 you're an adult" thing to be terribly arbitrary and too general. And like, I'm not saying this because I totes want to bang a 15 year old. 15 year olds can be more mature than 30 year olds. So that doesn't really change anything.

thegreekdog wrote:It takes a special kind of douchebag to distribute naked pictures without permission; and it takes an even specialier kind of douchebag to distribute naked pictures of an underage person without permission.


Obviously. I am in the possession of one of my exes' nudes and there's no way in Hell I'd ever give them to anyone. But:
1. It also takes a special kind of douchebag to kill anyone or fucking commit any crime
and 2. Like I already said, when you give someone nudes, you're giving them a gun and hoping they don't shoot you. Either don't give them the gun or don't give them a reason to shoot you.
mrswdk is a ho
User avatar
Lieutenant Army of GOD
 
Posts: 7191
Joined: Tue Feb 24, 2009 4:30 pm

Re: But she said she was 21

Postby Army of GOD on Mon Jan 13, 2014 7:42 pm

Also, let me state that this is all just one giant fucking gray area like everything that has to do with morals/ethics, and, similarly, there's a good chance I can contradict myself mid-sentence because I never like having a defined opinion about anything.
mrswdk is a ho
User avatar
Lieutenant Army of GOD
 
Posts: 7191
Joined: Tue Feb 24, 2009 4:30 pm

Re: But she said she was 21

Postby nietzsche on Mon Jan 13, 2014 7:46 pm

If I may, I think what AoG is trying to say is that if you are stuid enough to give someone a naked picture of you, you should bear the consecuences. He's upset with the stupidity of people, but he's a midget and can't really word what's in his head.
el cartoncito mas triste del mundo
User avatar
General nietzsche
 
Posts: 4597
Joined: Sun Feb 11, 2007 1:29 am
Location: Fantasy Cooperstown

Re: But she said she was 21

Postby Army of GOD on Mon Jan 13, 2014 7:49 pm

nietzsche wrote:If I may, I think what AoG is trying to say is that if you are stuid enough to give someone a naked picture of you, you should bear the consecuences. He's upset with the stupidity of people, but he's a midget and can't really word what's in his head.


Thank you for the "short-person-to-unintelligible-Mexican-English" translation.
mrswdk is a ho
User avatar
Lieutenant Army of GOD
 
Posts: 7191
Joined: Tue Feb 24, 2009 4:30 pm

Re: But she said she was 21

Postby nietzsche on Mon Jan 13, 2014 7:50 pm

Army of GOD wrote:
nietzsche wrote:If I may, I think what AoG is trying to say is that if you are stuid enough to give someone a naked picture of you, you should bear the consecuences. He's upset with the stupidity of people, but he's a midget and can't really word what's in his head.


Thank you for the "short-person-to-unintelligible-Mexican-English" translation.


De nada.
el cartoncito mas triste del mundo
User avatar
General nietzsche
 
Posts: 4597
Joined: Sun Feb 11, 2007 1:29 am
Location: Fantasy Cooperstown

Re: But she said she was 21

Postby notyou2 on Mon Jan 13, 2014 8:05 pm

Army of GOD wrote:Also, let me state that this is all just one giant fucking gray area like everything that has to do with morals/ethics, and, similarly, there's a good chance I can contradict myself mid-sentence because I never like having a defined opinion about anything.


If you are that slippery, you are in the wrong profession.

Sorry TGD, but you're a tax lawyer and it's OK to be slippery with taxes.
Image
User avatar
Captain notyou2
 
Posts: 6447
Joined: Thu Jan 15, 2009 10:09 am
Location: In the here and now

Re: But she said she was 21

Postby Army of GOD on Mon Jan 13, 2014 8:32 pm

notyou2 wrote:
Army of GOD wrote:Also, let me state that this is all just one giant fucking gray area like everything that has to do with morals/ethics, and, similarly, there's a good chance I can contradict myself mid-sentence because I never like having a defined opinion about anything.


If you are that slippery, you are in the wrong profession.


But I'm in the lube-producing profession...
mrswdk is a ho
User avatar
Lieutenant Army of GOD
 
Posts: 7191
Joined: Tue Feb 24, 2009 4:30 pm

Re: But she said she was 21

Postby thegreekdog on Mon Jan 13, 2014 8:42 pm

Army of GOD wrote:
thegreekdog wrote:It takes a special kind of douchebag to distribute naked pictures without permission; and it takes an even specialier kind of douchebag to distribute naked pictures of an underage person without permission.


Obviously. I am in the possession of one of my exes' nudes and there's no way in Hell I'd ever give them to anyone. But:
1. It also takes a special kind of douchebag to kill anyone or fucking commit any crime
and 2. Like I already said, when you give someone nudes, you're giving them a gun and hoping they don't shoot you. Either don't give them the gun or don't give them a reason to shoot you.


I agree with you to a certain extent. I agree that no one should send nude pictures to their significant other and that there is some responsibility on their part. But I don't think that person is being an asshole or doucebaggy. I think that person is stupid (and too trusting). But I don't think that person gets what he/she deserves if the ex-boy/girlfriend ends up sending those things around.

Your gun analogy works too, I guess, except that, again, the bigger douchebag is the one doing the shooting, not the one handing over the gun.

notyou2 wrote:
Army of GOD wrote:Also, let me state that this is all just one giant fucking gray area like everything that has to do with morals/ethics, and, similarly, there's a good chance I can contradict myself mid-sentence because I never like having a defined opinion about anything.


If you are that slippery, you are in the wrong profession.

Sorry TGD, but you're a tax lawyer and it's OK to be slippery with taxes.


Not to derail, but lawyers aren't as slippery as one may think. That's a misnomer perpetuated by society and novelists, TV show and movie writers. Lawyers work within ridiculous ethical boundaries with major punishments for things dealing with the law and things not dealing with the law. It's pretty absurd the ethical hoops one has to jump through.
Image
User avatar
Sergeant 1st Class thegreekdog
 
Posts: 7246
Joined: Thu Jul 17, 2008 6:55 am
Location: Philadelphia

Re: But she said she was 21

Postby AndyDufresne on Tue Jan 14, 2014 10:38 am

thegreekdog wrote:Not to derail, but lawyers aren't as slippery as one may think. That's a misnomer perpetuated by society and novelists, TV show and movie writers. Lawyers work within ridiculous ethical boundaries with major punishments for things dealing with the law and things not dealing with the law. It's pretty absurd the ethical hoops one has to jump through.

TGD, all I know about lawyers, are the ones I see on Star Trek. Most have been fair, but misguided. :(


--Andy
User avatar
Corporal 1st Class AndyDufresne
 
Posts: 24935
Joined: Fri Mar 03, 2006 8:22 pm
Location: A Banana Palm in Zihuatanejo

Re: But she said she was 21

Postby thegreekdog on Tue Jan 14, 2014 1:16 pm

AndyDufresne wrote:
thegreekdog wrote:Not to derail, but lawyers aren't as slippery as one may think. That's a misnomer perpetuated by society and novelists, TV show and movie writers. Lawyers work within ridiculous ethical boundaries with major punishments for things dealing with the law and things not dealing with the law. It's pretty absurd the ethical hoops one has to jump through.

TGD, all I know about lawyers, are the ones I see on Star Trek. Most have been fair, but misguided. :(


--Andy


I thought they killed all the lawyers before the Star Trek timeline. Where's Woodruff for confirmation?
Image
User avatar
Sergeant 1st Class thegreekdog
 
Posts: 7246
Joined: Thu Jul 17, 2008 6:55 am
Location: Philadelphia

Re: But she said she was 21

Postby Symmetry on Tue Jan 14, 2014 1:19 pm

thegreekdog wrote:
AndyDufresne wrote:
thegreekdog wrote:Not to derail, but lawyers aren't as slippery as one may think. That's a misnomer perpetuated by society and novelists, TV show and movie writers. Lawyers work within ridiculous ethical boundaries with major punishments for things dealing with the law and things not dealing with the law. It's pretty absurd the ethical hoops one has to jump through.

TGD, all I know about lawyers, are the ones I see on Star Trek. Most have been fair, but misguided. :(


--Andy


I thought they killed all the lawyers before the Star Trek timeline. Where's Woodruff for confirmation?


In a rebooted timeline?
the world is in greater peril from those who tolerate or encourage evil than from those who actually commit it- Albert Einstein
User avatar
Sergeant Symmetry
 
Posts: 9255
Joined: Sat Feb 24, 2007 5:49 am

Re: But she said she was 21

Postby thegreekdog on Tue Jan 14, 2014 2:10 pm

Symmetry wrote:
thegreekdog wrote:
AndyDufresne wrote:
thegreekdog wrote:Not to derail, but lawyers aren't as slippery as one may think. That's a misnomer perpetuated by society and novelists, TV show and movie writers. Lawyers work within ridiculous ethical boundaries with major punishments for things dealing with the law and things not dealing with the law. It's pretty absurd the ethical hoops one has to jump through.

TGD, all I know about lawyers, are the ones I see on Star Trek. Most have been fair, but misguided. :(


--Andy


I thought they killed all the lawyers before the Star Trek timeline. Where's Woodruff for confirmation?


In a rebooted timeline?


I believe it was mentioned in the first episode of Star Trek: The Next Generation. Not sure about the reboot.
Image
User avatar
Sergeant 1st Class thegreekdog
 
Posts: 7246
Joined: Thu Jul 17, 2008 6:55 am
Location: Philadelphia

Re: But she said she was 21

Postby Symmetry on Tue Jan 14, 2014 2:15 pm

thegreekdog wrote:
Symmetry wrote:
thegreekdog wrote:
AndyDufresne wrote:
thegreekdog wrote:Not to derail, but lawyers aren't as slippery as one may think. That's a misnomer perpetuated by society and novelists, TV show and movie writers. Lawyers work within ridiculous ethical boundaries with major punishments for things dealing with the law and things not dealing with the law. It's pretty absurd the ethical hoops one has to jump through.

TGD, all I know about lawyers, are the ones I see on Star Trek. Most have been fair, but misguided. :(


--Andy


I thought they killed all the lawyers before the Star Trek timeline. Where's Woodruff for confirmation?


In a rebooted timeline?


I believe it was mentioned in the first episode of Star Trek: The Next Generation. Not sure about the reboot.


He was there last time I checked.
the world is in greater peril from those who tolerate or encourage evil than from those who actually commit it- Albert Einstein
User avatar
Sergeant Symmetry
 
Posts: 9255
Joined: Sat Feb 24, 2007 5:49 am

Re: But she said she was 21

Postby Lootifer on Tue Jan 14, 2014 3:38 pm

Army of GOD wrote:
Lootifer wrote:1) What about if we have an agreement that you wont share them?


What does it matter? Either we don't have an agreement and I share them and I'm a dick, or I do have an agreement and I share them and I'm a dick. Either way the person who is sharing them is a dick, but that just comes down to a difference in moral values. But you're the person that gave me the gun and bullets, so I place more blame on you than me (not saying either are totally blameless).

I should have clarified. I meant an agreement that was legally binding or some such. I.e. You distribute them I sue the f*ck out of you.
I go to the gym to justify my mockery of fat people.
User avatar
Lieutenant Lootifer
 
Posts: 1084
Joined: Mon Feb 16, 2009 7:30 pm
Location: Competing

Re: But she said she was 21

Postby AndyDufresne on Tue Jan 14, 2014 4:02 pm

thegreekdog wrote:
Symmetry wrote:
thegreekdog wrote:
AndyDufresne wrote:
thegreekdog wrote:Not to derail, but lawyers aren't as slippery as one may think. That's a misnomer perpetuated by society and novelists, TV show and movie writers. Lawyers work within ridiculous ethical boundaries with major punishments for things dealing with the law and things not dealing with the law. It's pretty absurd the ethical hoops one has to jump through.

TGD, all I know about lawyers, are the ones I see on Star Trek. Most have been fair, but misguided. :(


--Andy


I thought they killed all the lawyers before the Star Trek timeline. Where's Woodruff for confirmation?


In a rebooted timeline?


I believe it was mentioned in the first episode of Star Trek: The Next Generation. Not sure about the reboot.


From Memory Alpha, the go to knowledge of Star Trek:

On Earth after a nuclear war circa 2079, lawyers were, for a time, abolished by execution. (TNG: "Encounter at Farpoint") However, in the Federation, lawyers existed in the 23rd and 24th centuries.


TGD, will you live to 2079?

Also, I forgot I actually have two sources about lawyers. Star Trek -- AND -- Futurama.



This man is also a lawyer, but I couldn't find a clip on youtube:

Image


--Andy
User avatar
Corporal 1st Class AndyDufresne
 
Posts: 24935
Joined: Fri Mar 03, 2006 8:22 pm
Location: A Banana Palm in Zihuatanejo

Re: But she said she was 21

Postby betiko on Tue Jan 14, 2014 4:53 pm

I think the right comparison i making yourself a tatt with your significant other s name or giving a naked picture. And yes both are stupid.
Image
User avatar
Major betiko
 
Posts: 10941
Joined: Fri Feb 25, 2011 3:05 pm
Location: location, location
22

Re: But she said she was 21

Postby Army of GOD on Tue Jan 14, 2014 6:48 pm

Star Trek is for nerds.

Lootifer wrote:
Army of GOD wrote:
Lootifer wrote:1) What about if we have an agreement that you wont share them?


What does it matter? Either we don't have an agreement and I share them and I'm a dick, or I do have an agreement and I share them and I'm a dick. Either way the person who is sharing them is a dick, but that just comes down to a difference in moral values. But you're the person that gave me the gun and bullets, so I place more blame on you than me (not saying either are totally blameless).

I should have clarified. I meant an agreement that was legally binding or some such. I.e. You distribute them I sue the f*ck out of you.


If it was legally binding (and completely legal...I don't really know anything about the laws of contracts and such) then you should be able to sue the f*ck out of what is legally allowed by the contract.
mrswdk is a ho
User avatar
Lieutenant Army of GOD
 
Posts: 7191
Joined: Tue Feb 24, 2009 4:30 pm

Re: But she said she was 21

Postby AndyDufresne on Wed Jan 15, 2014 10:07 am

Army of GOD wrote:Star Trek is for nerds.


Image

And Sherry Jackson:

Image


--Andy
User avatar
Corporal 1st Class AndyDufresne
 
Posts: 24935
Joined: Fri Mar 03, 2006 8:22 pm
Location: A Banana Palm in Zihuatanejo

Re: But she said she was 21

Postby notyou2 on Wed Jan 15, 2014 8:35 pm

Did Kirk get to kiss Sherry? She's hot.
Image
User avatar
Captain notyou2
 
Posts: 6447
Joined: Thu Jan 15, 2009 10:09 am
Location: In the here and now

Previous

Return to Acceptable Content

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users