Moderator: Community Team
mrswdk wrote:inb4
AndyDufresne wrote:
--Andy
Lootifer wrote:1) What about if we have an agreement that you wont share them?
2) What if im stupid and dont realise its in my best interest to have an agreement so we dont have one, but we should?
3) What if im stupid and dont realise its in my best interest to have an agreement so we dont have one? note: you knew this before the exchange and it was the fundamental reason you asked for pics in the first place.
4) What if the stupid person in situation 3 is also a 16 year old girl?
thegreekdog wrote:It takes a special kind of douchebag to distribute naked pictures without permission; and it takes an even specialier kind of douchebag to distribute naked pictures of an underage person without permission.
nietzsche wrote:If I may, I think what AoG is trying to say is that if you are stuid enough to give someone a naked picture of you, you should bear the consecuences. He's upset with the stupidity of people, but he's a midget and can't really word what's in his head.
Army of GOD wrote:nietzsche wrote:If I may, I think what AoG is trying to say is that if you are stuid enough to give someone a naked picture of you, you should bear the consecuences. He's upset with the stupidity of people, but he's a midget and can't really word what's in his head.
Thank you for the "short-person-to-unintelligible-Mexican-English" translation.
Army of GOD wrote:Also, let me state that this is all just one giant fucking gray area like everything that has to do with morals/ethics, and, similarly, there's a good chance I can contradict myself mid-sentence because I never like having a defined opinion about anything.
notyou2 wrote:Army of GOD wrote:Also, let me state that this is all just one giant fucking gray area like everything that has to do with morals/ethics, and, similarly, there's a good chance I can contradict myself mid-sentence because I never like having a defined opinion about anything.
If you are that slippery, you are in the wrong profession.
Army of GOD wrote:thegreekdog wrote:It takes a special kind of douchebag to distribute naked pictures without permission; and it takes an even specialier kind of douchebag to distribute naked pictures of an underage person without permission.
Obviously. I am in the possession of one of my exes' nudes and there's no way in Hell I'd ever give them to anyone. But:
1. It also takes a special kind of douchebag to kill anyone or fucking commit any crime
and 2. Like I already said, when you give someone nudes, you're giving them a gun and hoping they don't shoot you. Either don't give them the gun or don't give them a reason to shoot you.
notyou2 wrote:Army of GOD wrote:Also, let me state that this is all just one giant fucking gray area like everything that has to do with morals/ethics, and, similarly, there's a good chance I can contradict myself mid-sentence because I never like having a defined opinion about anything.
If you are that slippery, you are in the wrong profession.
Sorry TGD, but you're a tax lawyer and it's OK to be slippery with taxes.
thegreekdog wrote:Not to derail, but lawyers aren't as slippery as one may think. That's a misnomer perpetuated by society and novelists, TV show and movie writers. Lawyers work within ridiculous ethical boundaries with major punishments for things dealing with the law and things not dealing with the law. It's pretty absurd the ethical hoops one has to jump through.
AndyDufresne wrote:thegreekdog wrote:Not to derail, but lawyers aren't as slippery as one may think. That's a misnomer perpetuated by society and novelists, TV show and movie writers. Lawyers work within ridiculous ethical boundaries with major punishments for things dealing with the law and things not dealing with the law. It's pretty absurd the ethical hoops one has to jump through.
TGD, all I know about lawyers, are the ones I see on Star Trek. Most have been fair, but misguided.
--Andy
thegreekdog wrote:AndyDufresne wrote:thegreekdog wrote:Not to derail, but lawyers aren't as slippery as one may think. That's a misnomer perpetuated by society and novelists, TV show and movie writers. Lawyers work within ridiculous ethical boundaries with major punishments for things dealing with the law and things not dealing with the law. It's pretty absurd the ethical hoops one has to jump through.
TGD, all I know about lawyers, are the ones I see on Star Trek. Most have been fair, but misguided.
--Andy
I thought they killed all the lawyers before the Star Trek timeline. Where's Woodruff for confirmation?
Symmetry wrote:thegreekdog wrote:AndyDufresne wrote:thegreekdog wrote:Not to derail, but lawyers aren't as slippery as one may think. That's a misnomer perpetuated by society and novelists, TV show and movie writers. Lawyers work within ridiculous ethical boundaries with major punishments for things dealing with the law and things not dealing with the law. It's pretty absurd the ethical hoops one has to jump through.
TGD, all I know about lawyers, are the ones I see on Star Trek. Most have been fair, but misguided.
--Andy
I thought they killed all the lawyers before the Star Trek timeline. Where's Woodruff for confirmation?
In a rebooted timeline?
thegreekdog wrote:Symmetry wrote:thegreekdog wrote:AndyDufresne wrote:thegreekdog wrote:Not to derail, but lawyers aren't as slippery as one may think. That's a misnomer perpetuated by society and novelists, TV show and movie writers. Lawyers work within ridiculous ethical boundaries with major punishments for things dealing with the law and things not dealing with the law. It's pretty absurd the ethical hoops one has to jump through.
TGD, all I know about lawyers, are the ones I see on Star Trek. Most have been fair, but misguided.
--Andy
I thought they killed all the lawyers before the Star Trek timeline. Where's Woodruff for confirmation?
In a rebooted timeline?
I believe it was mentioned in the first episode of Star Trek: The Next Generation. Not sure about the reboot.
Army of GOD wrote:Lootifer wrote:1) What about if we have an agreement that you wont share them?
What does it matter? Either we don't have an agreement and I share them and I'm a dick, or I do have an agreement and I share them and I'm a dick. Either way the person who is sharing them is a dick, but that just comes down to a difference in moral values. But you're the person that gave me the gun and bullets, so I place more blame on you than me (not saying either are totally blameless).
thegreekdog wrote:Symmetry wrote:thegreekdog wrote:AndyDufresne wrote:thegreekdog wrote:Not to derail, but lawyers aren't as slippery as one may think. That's a misnomer perpetuated by society and novelists, TV show and movie writers. Lawyers work within ridiculous ethical boundaries with major punishments for things dealing with the law and things not dealing with the law. It's pretty absurd the ethical hoops one has to jump through.
TGD, all I know about lawyers, are the ones I see on Star Trek. Most have been fair, but misguided.
--Andy
I thought they killed all the lawyers before the Star Trek timeline. Where's Woodruff for confirmation?
In a rebooted timeline?
I believe it was mentioned in the first episode of Star Trek: The Next Generation. Not sure about the reboot.
On Earth after a nuclear war circa 2079, lawyers were, for a time, abolished by execution. (TNG: "Encounter at Farpoint") However, in the Federation, lawyers existed in the 23rd and 24th centuries.
Lootifer wrote:Army of GOD wrote:Lootifer wrote:1) What about if we have an agreement that you wont share them?
What does it matter? Either we don't have an agreement and I share them and I'm a dick, or I do have an agreement and I share them and I'm a dick. Either way the person who is sharing them is a dick, but that just comes down to a difference in moral values. But you're the person that gave me the gun and bullets, so I place more blame on you than me (not saying either are totally blameless).
I should have clarified. I meant an agreement that was legally binding or some such. I.e. You distribute them I sue the f*ck out of you.
Army of GOD wrote:Star Trek is for nerds.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users