DoomYoshi wrote:Why do you keep brining up McCain? Isn't he a failed presidential candidate? What the f*ck does he have to do with anything? He hasn't been on the news for 3 years at least.
I'm bringing him up because American politicians, including Obama, cheer lead like idiots and it results in needless deaths. To the American government it wasn't a coup in Ukraine, it was democracy in action.
Remember back to Egypt, the military runs the country no matter who is in office. They get sick of Morsi and then boot him out of power and arrest him. It was a coup, there is no other word to describe it. Sec of State Kerry comes out and says it's not a coup but the Egyptian military is "restoring democracy".
So we get this coup in Ukraine and the politicians start jumping up yelling Democracy and get a bunch of people riled up to support the "democratic" movement and as a result we are seeing the consequences of a coup. War, civil strife and chaos.
DoomYoshi wrote:Paragraph 1 is false. Klitschko speaks Russian at home with his wife. As he has admitted, he speaks better German than Ukrainian, klitschko is the Russian people, everyone else is just a wannabe.
You doubt what I said? Then take it up with Reuters. I don't know what Klitschko's angle is but whatever it is he better hope the counter coup doesn't succeed before he gets whatever it is he wants.
https://www.google.com/url?sa=t&rct=j&q ... 6460,d.b2IDoomYoshi wrote:Which people do you want to be honest?
I want the people who were "outstanding! The Ukrainian people are finally standing up for themselves!" to be honest. They got their opinion from propaganda. There is plenty of it being thrown around, but calling a coup "democracy" is about as far from honest as one can get.
Just call a coup a coup and understand what kind of people it is that launches coups. Power hungry mongers who are willing to sacrifice lives so that they can take control today instead of winning power through elections based in ideas.
The people who took Kiev couldn't risk actually being
voted into power, thus the reason they turned down all requests of power sharing and compromise.
Aren't we supposed to be big on compromise? Well, things are spiraling now to the point where compromise is going to be very difficult and the result is going to be a lot of deaths.
Will those who were cheering all this on in the beginning accept responsibility for their small part in the deaths that follow?
One of the very few things I've ever actually approved of from Obama was when he kept his mouth shut during the not so long ago Iranian revolt a few years ago. The Republicans were calling him names for not at least supporting the movement publicly. It would have served no purpose, it was doomed to failure. To egg them on would only increase the death toll. Not to mention it wasn't any of our business anyway!
Unless the US is ready to go to war to support the coup then we should shut the hell up and stay out of the mess all together. But the politicians have to constantly redefine things like what "coup" means so they can appear pro democracy as if that's some sort of catch all of redeeming qualities in a politician.