Moderator: Community Team
Metsfanmax wrote:nietzsche wrote:do me do me!!
Lawful Evil
nietzsche wrote:Metsfanmax wrote:nietzsche wrote:do me do me!!
Lawful Evil
According to macbone's first poster, I want to be Chaotic Neutral, also, Johnny Depp gets a lot of pussy, so that'll be me. Chaotic Evil is also very appealing but I'm not really evil.
BigBallinStalin wrote:nietzsche wrote:Metsfanmax wrote:nietzsche wrote:do me do me!!
Lawful Evil
According to macbone's first poster, I want to be Chaotic Neutral, also, Johnny Depp gets a lot of pussy, so that'll be me. Chaotic Evil is also very appealing but I'm not really evil.
I don't think anyone here is. Some are Lawful Evil or Neutral Evil, but no Chaotic Evil. Then again... there's good chances that one of the lurkers is Chaotic Evil.
notyou2 wrote:tgd neutral good
muy_thaiguy wrote:What would I be? Never played DoD before.
PLAYER57832 wrote:notyou2 wrote:tgd neutral good
I think more chaotic good, the ultimate liberaterian leaning. (make that the leaning of a liberaterian with morals, anyway)
thegreekdog wrote:PLAYER57832 wrote:notyou2 wrote:tgd neutral good
I think more chaotic good, the ultimate liberaterian leaning. (make that the leaning of a liberaterian with morals, anyway)
I agree. I would think chaotic good or perhaps true neutral.
notyou2 wrote:thegreekdog wrote:PLAYER57832 wrote:notyou2 wrote:tgd neutral good
I think more chaotic good, the ultimate liberaterian leaning. (make that the leaning of a liberaterian with morals, anyway)
I agree. I would think chaotic good or perhaps true neutral.
One small glaring issue......you practice LAW
thegreekdog wrote:notyou2 wrote:thegreekdog wrote:PLAYER57832 wrote:notyou2 wrote:tgd neutral good
I think more chaotic good, the ultimate liberaterian leaning. (make that the leaning of a liberaterian with morals, anyway)
I agree. I would think chaotic good or perhaps true neutral.
One small glaring issue......you practice LAW
Yes, well, I don't practice law on the CC forums and most people would not consider lawyers to be of "lawful" alignment (except district attorneys). Anyone not representing the government in a legal capacity is in legal conflict with the government and thus can't be lawful.
thegreekdog wrote:notyou2 wrote:thegreekdog wrote:PLAYER57832 wrote:notyou2 wrote:tgd neutral good
I think more chaotic good, the ultimate liberaterian leaning. (make that the leaning of a liberaterian with morals, anyway)
I agree. I would think chaotic good or perhaps true neutral.
One small glaring issue......you practice LAW
Yes, well, I don't practice law on the CC forums and most people would not consider lawyers to be of "lawful" alignment (except district attorneys). Anyone not representing the government in a legal capacity is in legal conflict with the government and thus can't be lawful.
Metsfanmax wrote:thegreekdog wrote:notyou2 wrote:thegreekdog wrote:PLAYER57832 wrote:notyou2 wrote:tgd neutral good
I think more chaotic good, the ultimate liberaterian leaning. (make that the leaning of a liberaterian with morals, anyway)
I agree. I would think chaotic good or perhaps true neutral.
One small glaring issue......you practice LAW
Yes, well, I don't practice law on the CC forums and most people would not consider lawyers to be of "lawful" alignment (except district attorneys). Anyone not representing the government in a legal capacity is in legal conflict with the government and thus can't be lawful.
Being "in conflict" with the government in a legal sense is different from actively standing up against the government's legitimacy. By defending a client in legal proceedings, you are implicitly legitimizing the government's ability to collect taxes on its citizens, even if you win a particular case that results in a particular client having less of a tax obligation. Therefore I categorize you as Neutral Good.
AndyDufresne wrote:muy_thaiguy wrote:What would I be? Never played DoD before.
My immediate assessment would be something close to Neutral Good, since you aren't an antagonist in the Off Topics, except when Wyoming is doing something in sports.
--Andy
mrswdk wrote:Does Dungeons and Dragons have a ruler? I'd definitely be queen.
notyou2 wrote:thegreekdog wrote:PLAYER57832 wrote:notyou2 wrote:tgd neutral good
I think more chaotic good, the ultimate liberaterian leaning. (make that the leaning of a liberaterian with morals, anyway)
I agree. I would think chaotic good or perhaps true neutral.
One small glaring issue......you practice LAW
Baron Von PWN wrote:I say BBS is chaotic Neutral.
Army of GOD wrote:AoG: sexy neutral
PLAYER57832 wrote:Baron Von PWN wrote:I say BBS is chaotic Neutral.
No lawful neutral. He believes in the system and is not necessarily interested in any ultimate good or bad.
Users browsing this forum: Fosteree