DaGip wrote:Symmetry wrote:
Nice dig, Symm!
I liked it.
Moderator: Community Team
DaGip wrote:Symmetry wrote:
Nice dig, Symm!
Phatty's favorite TV show:Symmetry wrote:DaGip wrote:Symmetry wrote:
Nice dig, Symm!
I liked it.
Army of GOD wrote:This thread is now about my large penis
a6mzero wrote:patrickaa317 wrote:Isn't the biggest question, why are corporations forced to provide healthcare anyway? I always thought this was offered to employees as a "benefit" now it is a mandate. And why is there so much regulation around what should be forced into the plan that they choose to offer?
Jesus u should be a lobbyist for the poor suffering Koch brothers. Always enjoy hearing from the average American joe about how much they enjoy getting screwed by corporations.Hell why force them to pay min. wage we could all work for $2/hr and apply for Medicaid for our health insurance.
a6mzero wrote:patrickaa317 wrote:Isn't the biggest question, why are corporations forced to provide healthcare anyway?
Jesus u should be a lobbyist for the poor suffering Koch brothers.
Woodruff wrote:danfrank666 wrote:Woodruff wrote:danfrank666 wrote:Woodruff wrote:Anyone who supports the recent Supreme Court ruling AND feels that abortion should be illegal really needs to take a serious look at their values. The ability for a woman to have easy access to contraceptives helps to prevent unwanted pregnancies which LITERALLY helps to keep down the need for abortions. Thus, this ruling actually acts to INCREASE future abortions due to unwanted pregnancies.
When your interviewed by hobby lobby they explain that they are deeply rooted in the catholic community and if you dont like it , you can get the f*ck out. A win for religious LIBERTY.
Did you feel any of this actually counters what I said? Because it doesn't, at all. Did you have a response to my point?
I support the ruling and I`m pro choice. The Kermit Gosnells of the world will be dealt with accordingly. Increase future abortions for Hobby Lobby Employees ?. Hobby Lobby is one of the highest paying entry level retailers . I believe their diligent when hiring .In the end, It all comes down to personal responsibility. What they cover is sufficient . The gov`t doesn`t cover all. Politically , it`s another scheme to divide and conquer.
Just because i quoted you doesn`t mean i disagree . I support the ruling , If your logical you should too.
Actually, you do bring up a good point in my wording...My problem isn't actually the RULING ITSELF - rather, it is Hobby Lobby's position that led to the ruling.
a6mzero wrote: the scope of family leave laws. This assault on women should come as no surprise,.
a6mzero wrote:patrickaa317 wrote:Isn't the biggest question, why are corporations forced to provide healthcare anyway? I always thought this was offered to employees as a "benefit" now it is a mandate. And why is there so much regulation around what should be forced into the plan that they choose to offer?
Jesus u should be a lobbyist for the poor suffering Koch brothers. Always enjoy hearing from the average American joe about how much they enjoy getting screwed by corporations.Hell why force them to pay min. wage we could all work for $2/hr and apply for Medicaid for our health insurance.
danfrank666 wrote:a6mzero wrote:patrickaa317 wrote:Isn't the biggest question, why are corporations forced to provide healthcare anyway? I always thought this was offered to employees as a "benefit" now it is a mandate. And why is there so much regulation around what should be forced into the plan that they choose to offer?
Jesus u should be a lobbyist for the poor suffering Koch brothers. Always enjoy hearing from the average American joe about how much they enjoy getting screwed by corporations.Hell why force them to pay min. wage we could all work for $2/hr and apply for Medicaid for our health insurance.
its obvious you dont understand the term of investment( one with no capital always will , you penniless fool) , its more than having babies and getting YOUR taxes back.
Phatscotty wrote:a6mzero wrote:patrickaa317 wrote:Isn't the biggest question, why are corporations forced to provide healthcare anyway?
Jesus u should be a lobbyist for the poor suffering Koch brothers.
And you call other people wingnuts? Whatever man, do what you do.
patrickaa317 wrote:a6mzero wrote:patrickaa317 wrote:Isn't the biggest question, why are corporations forced to provide healthcare anyway? I always thought this was offered to employees as a "benefit" now it is a mandate. And why is there so much regulation around what should be forced into the plan that they choose to offer?
Jesus u should be a lobbyist for the poor suffering Koch brothers. Always enjoy hearing from the average American joe about how much they enjoy getting screwed by corporations.Hell why force them to pay min. wage we could all work for $2/hr and apply for Medicaid for our health insurance.
I suppose you believe that corporations actually pay the corporate tax and that it isn't just passed onto the consumer. Higher minimum wages just mean higher prices for you at the cash register. i.e. Legislated Inflation.
$2/hour is more than the record 92 MILLION people out of the labor force currently make when they are NOT going to work... Then again there is a record 14 MILLION people getting a disability check.
Meanwhile, Koch Industries only employs 60,000 people. 1.4 Million people work at the evil world of WalMart. For all the people who bitch about how walmart treats its employees, there are about 10 times more people that collect disability checks from the government than that work at WalMart. If you know only one person who works at Walmart, odds are you still know 10 people who collect a disability check from the government.
Have a great day!
PLAYER57832 wrote:Too many of those who claim they don't believe global warming are really "end-timer" Christians.
danfrank666 wrote:Woodruff wrote:Actually, you do bring up a good point in my wording...My problem isn't actually the RULING ITSELF - rather, it is Hobby Lobby's position that led to the ruling.
It was just another angle at a law that was deemed constitutional. They only challenged a statute. Lets face it , if it was about dentures it never would have made the news.
danfrank666 wrote:Walk into your place of employment tomorrow and say they should give me rubbers for free , hell hand`em out with each paycheck. isnt that rediculous
danfrank666 wrote:a6mzero wrote: the scope of family leave laws. This assault on women should come as no surprise,.
Wow, you finally said something i may agree with, women should be paid for a said period of time to nurture a newborn child. Yet again an outline needs to be established so that career babymakers cannot exploit.
jay_a2j wrote:1. You might be a liberal if you think that the Supreme Court just banned use of all birth control.
jay_a2j wrote:2. You might be a liberal if you think logic and reason are gender biased.
jay_a2j wrote:3. You might be a liberal if you think the Hobby Lobby case is NOT about abortion.
jay_a2j wrote:4. You might be a liberal if you think all women just lost access to affordable contraception.
jay_a2j wrote:5. You might be a liberal if you think your boss will now make birth-control decisions for you.
jay_a2j wrote:FACT: The hottest month on record was July 1936, but liberals are still trying to shove man-made global warming down your throat.
jay_a2j wrote:7. You might be a liberal if you accuse conservatives of not being able to read the First Amendment.
Woodruff wrote:danfrank666 wrote:Woodruff wrote:Actually, you do bring up a good point in my wording...My problem isn't actually the RULING ITSELF - rather, it is Hobby Lobby's position that led to the ruling.
It was just another angle at a law that was deemed constitutional. They only challenged a statute. Lets face it , if it was about dentures it never would have made the news.
The difference is that Hobby Lobby went about it as if religion was the issue. If they had simply stated that their insurance would not pay for those four birth control methods, there likely would never have been an outcry. Their mistake was in making it a religious issue unnecessarily and frankly stupidly. Religion didn't have a place in it because they're a business, not a religious organization.
jay_a2j wrote:1. You might be a liberal if you think that the Supreme Court just banned use of all birth control.
FACT: SCOTUS based its ruling on the law, which is what good judges always do.
So according to John Roberts and the 4 corporist's the previous 200 years worth of rulings on the matter of corporations being able to claim
exemptions from the law based on religion are now all null and void.
7. You might be a liberal if you accuse conservatives of not being able to read the First Amendment.
a6mzero wrote:The republicans could give a ratsass about the 1st and 4th amendments.All they really care about is POWER.
PLAYER57832 wrote:Too many of those who claim they don't believe global warming are really "end-timer" Christians.
a6mzero wrote:Now that John Roberts and the 4 corporist's have ruled your employer not your doctor will be making your health care decisions they will next rule employer's can tell employees how to spend their money.
AndyDufresne wrote:I'm still glad my vasectomies are covered though.
a6mzero wrote:Now that John Roberts and the 4 corporist's have ruled your employer not your doctor will be making your health care decisions they will next rule employer's can tell employees how to spend their money.
Users browsing this forum: mookiemcgee