TA1LGUNN3R wrote:Re: DaGip--
Where do you come up with this stuff?
-TG
The Book Of Enki. You should read it or listen to it online.
It even claimed that the Annunaki used clay to create humans. The Bible says that Adam was made from "dust" of the earth. In the Quran it is written that humans came from a "Smooth mud".
Hearken and remember, ye of so little faith:
Clay hypothesisA model for the origin of life based on clay was forwarded by A. Graham Cairns-Smith in 1985 and explored as a plausible illustration by several scientists.[183] The Clay hypothesis postulates that complex organic molecules arose gradually on a pre-existing, non-organic replication platform of silicate crystals in solution.
Cairns-Smith is a trenchant critic of other models of chemical evolution.[184] However, he admits that like many models of the origin of life, his own also has its shortcomings.
In 2007, Kahr and colleagues reported their experiments that tested the idea that crystals can act as a source of transferable information, using crystals of potassium hydrogen phthalate. "Mother" crystals with imperfections were cleaved and used as seeds to grow "daughter" crystals from solution. They then examined the distribution of imperfections in the new crystals and found that the imperfections in the mother crystals were reproduced in the daughters, but the daughter crystals also had many additional imperfections. For gene-like behavior to be observed, the quantity of inheritance of these imperfections should have exceeded that of the mutations in the successive generations, but it did not. Thus Kahr concluded that the crystals, "were not faithful enough to store and transfer information from one generation to the next".
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Abiogenesi ... hypothesis
I just watched a science show last week on creating a living cell in a lab from inanimate substances. They are able to make "empty" cell-like structures from clay and pressurized gas. They believe within the next twenty years they will have made a simple cell that replicates with RNA in the lab. Not that any of this has anything to do with the subject of language, but I only point out the validity of an ancient Sumerian "science fiction" story and modern day science discoveries. I can't remember which show that was, I watched it maybe a couple weeks ago. Maybe someone else saw the same show? It was on the Sci channel.
I happen to believe that we are the descendents of the Annunaki or the Elohim, created ('evolved") through genetic engineering of some ape creature found in Southern Africa (most likely Australopithecus Africanus).

Early alien-australopithecus hybrids understood simple commands, but lacked the ability to form articulate speech or/and were too bulky or deformed to hold tools or perform the necessary tasks that the Annunaki desired in an alien hybrid.
When finally the Annunaki figured out that they needed to put the hybridized zygote into a volunteer Annunaki surrogate to accomplish a more intelligent creature is when humans first partook of a type of advanced lingual communication. Whatever language the Annunaki taught the first humans would have been their starting point, and that would have happened in the area of Eridu located in Iraq.