
Moderator: Community Team
Congenital Adrenal Hyperplasia wrote:The first known patient with CAH was described in 1865 by Luigi De Crecchio, a professor of anatomy in Napoli (7). He was doing an autopsy of a man named Giuseppe Marzo, who died suddenly in his forties. The professor expressed marked surprise at the findings of uterus and fallopian tubes in this man, who also happened to have very large adrenals. The patient had a six centimeter long “penis”, but no testes. At birth he was initially regarded a girl, but at four years of age he was reconsidered a male. As an adult he fell in love with a girl; however, when he proposed to marry her she ran away after realising that his birth certificate carried the name Guiseppina. The story goes that Guiseppe died of a broken heart, but probably he died of a salt-wasting crisis (8).
Lord Arioch wrote:Because its like sex a biological thingy and not a social thingy?
I dont think most people activly choose gender i think they react on their environment. Women might take on a male gender because it gives them certain advantages and vice versa. If u look at women in high positions of power many of them have a male gender cause thats what allows them to retain that position.
Phatscotty wrote:Lord Arioch wrote:Because its like sex a biological thingy and not a social thingy?
I dont think most people activly choose gender i think they react on their environment. Women might take on a male gender because it gives them certain advantages and vice versa. If u look at women in high positions of power many of them have a male gender cause thats what allows them to retain that position.
sex and skin color are biological, gender and race are social constructs.
What you say about why a woman might become transgender would also be true for another about why they might want to be transracial. In terms of identificiation and how one feels, why is gender wide open but race isn't?
I mean, before gay marriage, there were a few states in America that prevented a white man from marrying a black woman. The logic is all there
khazalid wrote:she's a kook.
btw, did anyone else read this a few days ago and immediately think of phatscotty?
When Universities decide something is okay, and start teaching that something is okay, it's not long before a slim majority start believing it's okay. That's just what they were taught. Most likely this will go down the same way as marriage; one un-elected judge also sympathetic (pedophile) declares it legal. Then it's a done deal. - Phatradamus
khazalid wrote:she's a kook.
btw, did anyone else read this a few days ago and immediately think of phatscotty?
Phatscotty wrote:When Universities decide something is okay, and start teaching that something is okay, it's not long before a slim majority start believing it's okay. That's just what they were taught. Most likely this will go down the same way as marriage; one un-elected judge also sympathetic (pedophile) declares it legal. Then it's a done deal. - Phatradamus
University Academics Say Pedophilia Is ‘Natural, And Normal For Males To Be Aroused By Children’
http://truthuncensored.net/university-a ... uJ5ag.dpbs
mrswdk wrote:Phatscotty wrote:When Universities decide something is okay, and start teaching that something is okay, it's not long before a slim majority start believing it's okay. That's just what they were taught. Most likely this will go down the same way as marriage; one un-elected judge also sympathetic (pedophile) declares it legal. Then it's a done deal. - Phatradamus
University Academics Say Pedophilia Is ‘Natural, And Normal For Males To Be Aroused By Children’
http://truthuncensored.net/university-a ... uJ5ag.dpbs
I thought you were the big libertarian?
Phatscotty wrote:mrswdk wrote:Phatscotty wrote:When Universities decide something is okay, and start teaching that something is okay, it's not long before a slim majority start believing it's okay. That's just what they were taught. Most likely this will go down the same way as marriage; one un-elected judge also sympathetic (pedophile) declares it legal. Then it's a done deal. - Phatradamus
University Academics Say Pedophilia Is ‘Natural, And Normal For Males To Be Aroused By Children’
http://truthuncensored.net/university-a ... uJ5ag.dpbs
I thought you were the big libertarian?
Nope, as any Libertarian here will tell ya with much more 'colorful' language. I am and have always been an Independent. Fiscally Conservative and socially Liberal. Just like the overwhelming majority of Americans. I like many Libertarian ideals, but only a few of the Libertarians I've met. I don't even get what you mean by asking that question, so that should tell ya all you need to know
mrswdk wrote:I'm not talking about a political party, bozo.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Libertarianism
Whatever happened to the idea of letting people decide for themselves how the want to live their lives?
notyou2 wrote:Phatscotty wrote:mrswdk wrote:Phatscotty wrote:When Universities decide something is okay, and start teaching that something is okay, it's not long before a slim majority start believing it's okay. That's just what they were taught. Most likely this will go down the same way as marriage; one un-elected judge also sympathetic (pedophile) declares it legal. Then it's a done deal. - Phatradamus
University Academics Say Pedophilia Is ‘Natural, And Normal For Males To Be Aroused By Children’
http://truthuncensored.net/university-a ... uJ5ag.dpbs
I thought you were the big libertarian?
Nope, as any Libertarian here will tell ya with much more 'colorful' language. I am and have always been an Independent. Fiscally Conservative and socially Liberal. Just like the overwhelming majority of Americans. I like many Libertarian ideals, but only a few of the Libertarians I've met. I don't even get what you mean by asking that question, so that should tell ya all you need to know
You call yourself "socially liberal"????
I disagree, I would tag you conservative.
Metsfanmax wrote:khazalid wrote:she's a kook.
btw, did anyone else read this a few days ago and immediately think of phatscotty?
I did, actually. Specifically I knew he was going to take this one woman and immediately universalize it to the entirety of what liberals believe.
Phatscotty wrote:Metsfanmax wrote:khazalid wrote:she's a kook.
btw, did anyone else read this a few days ago and immediately think of phatscotty?
I did, actually. Specifically I knew he was going to take this one woman and immediately universalize it to the entirety of what liberals believe.
The only thing I mentioned about Liberal anything was in a description of myself, and I never 'universalize'. But you just did! See how ya are? When ya try hard is when ya die hard. Stop trying so hard, maybe one day you too can get way out in front of something, rather than always cleaning up.
Phatscotty wrote:mrswdk wrote:I'm not talking about a political party, bozo.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Libertarianism
Whatever happened to the idea of letting people decide for themselves how the want to live their lives?
and only a tiny portion of my response had to do with political party.
Liberty is still a wonderful idea unless it involves things I don't like, such as pedophilia or incest. What happened to it? Progressives rejected it, many others take it for granted, don't have time to know or care, or forgot about it, others still are more worried about political correctness at all costs. If, as you seem to imply, Libertarians are the gate keepers and standard bearers of the idea of letting people decide for themselves how the want to live their lives.... they aren't doing a very good job using the zero power they have.
Simply put, your barking up the wrong tree here. Let Mets handle all that, already you are calling names
Phatscotty wrote:If sex does not dictate gender, why would skin color dictate race?
Credit and inspiration goes to Warmonger1981
Users browsing this forum: No registered users