Moderator: Community Team
owenshooter wrote:in before the lock/move... many people have posted articles about how the confederate flag once again became prominent and began to fly over state houses at the start of the civil rights struggle... enjoy discussing this in off topics...-JƩsus noir
ConfederateSS wrote: MYTH--The South revered slavery.
FACT--A very interesting fact on slavery is that at the time the War of 1861-1865 officially commenced,the Southern States were actually in process of freeing all slaves in the South. Russia had freed it's servants in 1859,and the South took great note of this. Had military intervention not been forced upon the South,a very different America would have been realized then as well as now.
Metsfanmax wrote:Do you have any sources at all for any of these claims, or is this just a copy/paste from some friend's Facebook post?
Army of GOD wrote:This thread is now about my large penis
warmonger1981 wrote:BTW Dagip WTF is that carving supposed to be?
jacktoo wrote:Immediately following his surrender at Appomattox, General Robert E. Lee, ordered the Battle Flag of the Army of Northern Virginia, the Stars and Bars, to be cased. Prior to his death he insisted that he not be buried in his Confederate uniform. His family asked that all veterans attending his funeral not wear their uniforms. Lee understood that the flag was a symbol a failed revolt, and when the revolt was over he put the symbol away. The Stars and Bars now belong in a museum not flying over public buildings.
muy_thaiguy wrote:Metsfanmax wrote:Do you have any sources at all for any of these claims, or is this just a copy/paste from some friend's Facebook post?
Probably the facebook post or some relatively unknown website trying to make excuses for a flag that was flown all of 4 years, until it was flown again to protest the Civil Rights Movement would be my guesses.
loutil wrote:I think you miss an important point...
It is not the true history of the flag that is important. It is the current meaning of the flag that matters. As an example: look at the swastika and what it means today vs what it meant for thousands of years. The word swastika comes from the Sanskrit svastika, which means āgood fortuneā or āwell-being."
Many racists have taken up the confederate flag as symbol of their ideology. What many people now see when presented with the confederate flag is "southern, redneck, racist."
For the record, I was born in the south and still live here today...
The white supremacist who designed the Confederacyās flag(s), one William T. Thompson, was proud to admit that āAs a people we are fighting to maintain the heavenly ordained supremacy of the white man over the inferior or colored race; a white flag would thus be emblematical of our cause. Such a flag would be a suitable emblem of our young confederacy, and sustained by the brave hearts and strong arms of the south, it would soon take rank among the proudest ensigns of the nations, and be hailed by the civilized world as THE WHITE MANāS FLAG.ā
that giant relief of American Traitors carved on the side of a mountain.
Probably the lamest, crappiest monument anybody has ever tried to deface God's mountains with! Yuck![/quote]
YES!!! THE SIOUX ALSO HAVE THE SAME FEELING...MOUNT RUSHMORE IS A TRIBUTE TO GENOCIDE!!!!
[quote="jonesthecurl wrote:The white supremacist who designed the Confederacyās flag(s), one William T. Thompson,
ConfederateSS wrote:-----I'll write it hear,but it covers GD and OT... It is the first responsibility of every citizen to question authority.--Ben.Franklin....
yes the Battle of Palmito Ranch can be interpreted as a Confederate win.. Could job confederates. you won a battle a month after General lee surrendered to Grant.. also on top of that Lee had the majority of troops 28,000 troops the battle of Palmito there was only 300. Now if your fighting a war I think a loss of 28,000 troops surrendering has a lot more impact on the over all war. A simple battle in Texas after the cause was pretty much over between a total of 900 troops on both sides is more of a little spat then anything with no real significance.ConfederateSS wrote:-----The last battle of The Civil War. Was a Confederate Victory!
.And the song is song to a British drinking song... your point? also the in the war of 1812 you may or may not remember we where still one country. Also if you talk to most historians about how they veiw early america they will say there are 3 unique parts the north, south and middle The middle consisting OF Maryland where Francis was from So he was not from the south. There are reasons historians do not lump them into south because there economy was much more industrialist then that of the south.. and there economies was not at the same based upon shipping in manufacturing it was a mixture of both.ConfederateSS wrote:-----The Star Spangled Banner--was written by a Southerner..
Dixie was written by a northern yes for a black face show.. however. The dixi that was song in the south during the civil war had lyrics changed to better show there pride in Dixieland. Also many in the south embraced the song and sang it at political rallies.ConfederateSS wrote:-----Dixie--was written by a Northerner...
Well yes we started under the Articles of Confederation However there is a number of reasons why we don't have it anymore. Reason 1. Economy.. rampant inflation was happening in each state. since each of the state printed there own money... they also would not accept money from other states due to inflation. so you see commerce is hard to do when your Confederacy all have diffract currencies. 2. States where not following congress instruction. It was hard for congress to adopt a trade treaty with any country as all it took was one state to say no.. this also made the influence of america start out on very shaky ground as foreigners could use or disunity against us. The government could not promote its protect the western boarder due to states not paying their dues to the federal government. basically it was a UN style government.(this is not a dis on un however it is very effective government.ConfederateSS wrote:-----The Style of this Confederacy shall be"The United States of America." Our country started with the Articles of Confederation. Making us all Confederates. The Sons of Liberty started Americans on the path of being "Rebels". As long as an American walks the face of The Earth. The Honor of being a Rebel/Confederate lives...
first off while this is true. He was also the one who stated at the start he would gladly accept the southern states back in the union if they promised that slavery would not move west but stay only in the states that had them. However after years of war and speaking with abolitionist he changed his mind and lobbed congress to pass the 13th 14th and 15th amendment. He helped push through with the help of congress. So yes moving African Americans out of the country was considered by some a middle ground.. it please the abolitionist and the slavery owners. Many politicians before this also held similar beliefs. also As the last part that is just Plain speculative history. A true historian stays far way from the if this would have happened if this had not happened statements.ConfederateSS wrote:-----America hit an entire race with Manifest Destiny....Lincoln used slavery as a tactic. To keep France and England out of the Civil War. From joining the South's cause. Lincoln also argued,it would be "better for us both,therefore,to be separated",when blacks gained their freedom. On a plan for colonization in Central America. To give a preview of what you are about to read. The part of Delaware is most scary. Not to mention Northern and Boarder States were not effected by Lincoln's attempt to free the slaves in the South. No matter what happened. Slavery would have ended. As it was dying out around the world. A Confederate States of America,would have gotten rid of slavery. By the on set of The 20th century. With or without a war...
Well actually it was fought for many reasons.. for example It was fought over states rights, slavery, economies, how big the federal government and many more reasons For example soldier part of the 54th masscutes probely fought to end slavery. some soldiers fraught cause it was considered there duty. The fact of the matter a war is fought by soldiers and there are always a multitude of reasons for why they fight. at the higher end you could make the same claim about the south who feared losing slavery would wreak there economy. as the economy in the south was based on slavery. he could also be seen as the south thinking they lost there voice in the Federal government. due to the changing congress towards more votes in favor of northern ideas. However the main reason it was fought was over slavery ever issue stated above came through in slavery the south feeling they could no longer protect that institution. The south felt it would ruin there economy if there was not free labor at there disposal. for the moral right.ConfederateSS wrote:------------Confederate History---Dispelling the Myths---by The SCV-----
History books,the media,the school systems etc..abound in falsehoods and inaccuracies of Confederate History. This fact sheet will help clarify and dispell some of these rampant inaccuracies.
MYTH--The War of 1861-1865 was fought over slavery.
FACT-- Terribly untrue. The North fought the war over money. Plain and simple. When the South started Secession. Lincoln was asked,"Why not let the South go in peace?" To which he replied,"I can't let them go. Who will pay for the government?" Sensing total financial ruin for the North. Lincoln waged war on the South. The South fought the war to repel Northern aggression and invasion.
ConfederateSS wrote: MYTH--Only Southerners owned slaves.
FACT--Entirely untrue. Many Northern civilians owned slaves. Prior to,during and even after the War of Northern Aggression. Surprisingly, to many history impaired individuals, most Union Generals and staff had slaves to serve them! William T. Sherman had many slaves that served him until well after the war was over and did not free them until late in 1865.
U.S. Grant also had several slaves,who were only freed after the 13th Amendment in December of 1865. When asked why he didn't free his slaves earlier. Grant stated,"Good help is so hard to come by these days."
Contrarily,Confederate General Robert E.LEE freed his slaves(which he never purchased-they were inherited by his wife,none other than George Washington's granddaughter.) in 1862!!! Lee freed his slaves three years before the war was over,and considerably earlier than his Northern counterparts. And during the fierce early days of the war. When the South was obliterating the Yankee armies.
Lastly,and most importantly,why did Northern States outlaw slavery only after the war was over? The so-called "Emancipation Proclamation" of Lincoln only gave freedom to slaves in the South! NOT the North! This pecksniffery even went so far as to find the State of Delaware rejecting the 13th Amendment in December of 1865 and did not ratify it(13th Amendment/free the slaves) until 1901!!!
ConfederateSS wrote: MYTH-- The Confederate Battle Flag was flown on slave ships.
FACT-- NONE of the flags of the Confederacy or the Southern Nation ever flew on a slave ship. Nor did the South own or operate any slave ships. The English,the Dutch and the Portuguese brought slaves to this country,not the South Nation.
But,even more monumental, it is also very important to know and understand that Federal,Yankee,Union ships brought slaves to America! These were from New England States,and their hypocrisy is atrocious.
These Federals were ones that ended up crying the loudest about slavery. But without their ships,many of the slaves would have never arrived here. They made countless fortunes on the delivery of slaves as well as the products made from raw materials such as cotton and tobacco in the South.
ConfederateSS wrote: This is the problem with Yankee history History is overwhelming portrayed incorrectly by most of the Federal & Yankee books and media.
MYTH-- The Confederate Battle Flag represented the South Nation.
FACT-- Not true While the Southern Battle Flag was carried into battle,the Southern Nation had 3 different National Flags during the course of the war.
The First National Flag--was changed due to a resemblance of the US flag.
The Second National Flag--was subsequently modified due to the similarity to a flag of truce.
The Third National Flag--was the adopted flag of the Confederacy.
The Confederate Battle Flag--was never a National Flag of the Confederacy.It was carried into battle by several armies such as the Army of Northern Virginia and the Army of Tennessee. Was also used by a Naval Jack by the Confederate Navy.
ConfederateSS wrote:MYTH--The Confederate Battle Flag is known as the"Stars and Bars".
FACT--A common misconception. The First National Confederate Flag is correctly known as the "Stars and Bars". The Confederate Battle Flag is known as"The Southern Cross".
MYTH--The Confederate Battle Flag represents racism today.
FACT--The Confederate Battle Flag today finds itself in the center of controversy and hoopla going on in several states. The cry to take this flag down is unjustified. It is very important to keep in mind that the Confederate Battle Flag was simply just that. A Battle Flag. It was never even a National flag,so how could it have flown over a slave nation or represented slavery or racism? This myth is continued by lack of education and ignorance. Those that vilify the Confederate Battle Flag are very confused about history and have jumped upon a bandwagon with loose wheels.
ConfederateSS wrote:MYTH--The United States Flag represented freedom.
FACT--No chance.The US flag flew over a slave nation for over 85 years! The North tolerated slavery and acknowledged it as a Division Of Labor. The North made a vast fortune on slavery and it's commodities. It wasn't until the South decided to leave the Union that the North objected. The North knew it could not survive without the Southern money. That is the true definition of hypocrisy.
again this is pure speculation if he would have or not or if he would have changed his mind is known as the emancipator for the reason that he lobbied congress and championed freedom from slavery. so yes he did a great jobConfederateSS wrote:MYTH--Abraham Lincoln was The Great Emancipator.
FACT--While Lincoln has went down in history as the Great Emancipator,many would not care to hear his real thoughts on people of color. Martyred President Abraham Lincoln was fervently making plans to send all freed slaves to the jungles of Central America once the War was over. Knowing that African Society would never allow he slaves to return back to Africa,Lincoln also did not want the slaves in the US. He thought the jungles of Central America would be the best solution and conductive to the freed slaves best interest. The only thing that kept this from happening,was his assassination.
again speculation history and real historians do not conjectural about what could have happened.ConfederateSS wrote:MYTH--The South revered slavery.
FACT--A very interesting fact on slavery is that at the time the War of 1861-1865 officially commenced,the Southern States were actually in process of freeing all slaves in the South. Russia had freed it's servants in 1859,and the South took great note of this. Had military intervention not been forced upon the South,a very different America would have been realized then as well as now.
ConfederateSS wrote: MYTH--The Confederate Army was comprised of rich slave owners.
FACT--Very far from the true. The vast majority of soldiers in the Confederate Army were simple men of meager income. Most of which were hard working farmers and common men. Then,as now,very few rich men ever fight a war.
ConfederateSS wrote: MYTH--Only the North had men of color in their ranks.
FACT--Quite simply a major falsehood of history. Many blacks, both free and of their own will ,joined the Confederate Army to fight for their beloved Southern home. Additionally,men of other ethnic extraction fought as well. Oriental,Mexican&Spanish men as well as Native American Indians fought with pride for the South.
Today,many men of color are members in the heritage group SCV--Sons Of Confederate Veterans. These men of color and pride rejoice in their heritage. The continued attacks on the Southern Nation,The Confederacy,and her Symbols are a terrible outrage to these fine people. These attacks should be denounced with as much fervor as those who denounce the South.
did you know symbols change on how they are preserved over time. based on current thinking it does sorry it happened to your symbol tell that to monks in India who had the swastika taken from them they know how you feel.ConfederateSS wrote: MYTH--The Confederate Flags are an authorized symbol of Aryan,KKK and hate groups.
FACT--Quite the contrary. These despicable organizations such as the KKK and the Aryans have taken a hallowed piece of History,and have plagued good Southern folks and the memories of fine Confederate Soldiers that fought under the flag with their perverse agenda. IN NO WAY does the Confederate Flag represent hate or violence. Heritage groups such as the SCV battle daily the damage done to a proud nation by these hate groups. The SCV denounces all hate groups,and pridefully boast HERITAGE---NOT HATE.
ConfederateSS wrote: MYTH--The SCV--Sons Of Confederate Veterans are a racist hate group.
FACT--This is a blatant attack on one of the finest heritage groups ever. The SCV--Sons Of Confederate Veterans are a Historical,patriotic and non political organization comprised of descendants of Confederate Soldiers and Sailors dedicated to insuring that a true history of the 1861-1865 period is preserved and presented to the public. The SCV continues to educate the public of the memory and reputation of The Confederate Soldiers as well the motives for his suffering and sacrifice. The SCV--Sons Of Confederate Veterans are in NO WAY affiliated with, nor does it recognize or condone the terrible legacy of hate groups such as the KKK.
ConfederateSS wrote:----Target..I didn't write the Myths and Facts...THE SCV did.....The stuff before that I did..those can be my quotes....But Lincoln, on Central America is a true statement..Look it up.As was Grant's. I know most Americans wouldn't want to hear such a thing.. But It still doesn't take away the job Lincoln pulled off. Holding America together. Just a little light on the man.
In United States history in the 1850s, the Fire-Eaters were a group of extremist pro-slavery Southern Democrat politicians who urged the separation of southern states into a new nation, which became known as the Confederate States of America. The dean of the group was Robert Barnwell Rhett of South Carolina. They sought to reopen the international slave trade, which had been illegal since 1808.
In the later half of the 1850s, the group reemerged. They used several recent events for propaganda, among them "Bleeding Kansas" and the Sumner-Brooks Affair, to accuse the North of trying to abolish slavery immediately. Using effective propaganda against 1860 presidential candidate Abraham Lincoln, the Fire-Eaters were able to convince many southerners of this false accusation. They first targeted South Carolina, which passed an article of secession in December 1860. Wigfall, for one, actively encouraged an attack on Fort Sumter to prompt Virginia and other upper Southern States to secede as well. The Fire-Eaters helped to unleash a chain reaction that eventually led to the formation of the Confederate States of America and to the American Civil War. Their influence waned quickly after the start of major fighting.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users