Women with exposed hair damage Western values

by **mrswdk** on Wed Jul 19, 2017 4:23 am

We are often subjected to propaganda about how the Western world has for decades/centuries valued things such as elective representation or a fairly liberal print media. What the propagandists often omit from their broadcasts is the historical Western emphasis on modesty:

Dress code etiquette states that women wear hats for formal events, says Diana Mather, a senior tutor for The English Manner etiquette consultancy.

"Up until the 1950s ladies were very seldom seen without a hat as it was not considered 'the thing' for ladies to show their hair in public.

Women (and men) who walk around with exposed hair and flesh are non-Western, little better than anarchists, and should be sent to integration and assimilation classes immediately.

by **Bernie Sanders** on Wed Jul 19, 2017 6:11 am

mrswdk wrote:We are often subjected to propaganda about how the Western world has for decades/centuries valued things such as elective representation or a fairly liberal print media. What the propagandists often omit from their broadcasts is the historical Western emphasis on modesty:

Dress code etiquette states that women wear hats for formal events, says Diana Mather, a senior tutor for The English Manner etiquette consultancy.

"Up until the 1950s ladies were very seldom seen without a hat as it was not considered 'the thing' for ladies to show their hair in public.

Women (and men) who walk around with exposed hair and flesh are non-Western, little better than anarchists, and should be sent to integration and assimilation classes immediately.

So, we should follow China's example?

by **mrswdk** on Wed Jul 19, 2017 6:18 am

Thanks in part to a lack of religious baggage China has been a shining example of equality and egalitarianism for far longer than any of the imperial dog nations. You could do worse than learn from China.

Hurray China (^_^)

by **waauw** on Wed Jul 19, 2017 6:23 am

Mrswdk is merely jealous of western curves.

by **mrswdk** on Wed Jul 19, 2017 8:44 am

No one is jealous of Western 'curves'.

by **Thorthoth** on Wed Jul 19, 2017 10:23 am

That betel nut spitting harpy is accidentally right this time. Simple modest head kerchiefs should be brought back for the distaff population.

by **waauw** on Wed Jul 19, 2017 2:39 pm

Thorthoth wrote:That betel nut spitting harpy is accidentally right this time. Simple modest head kerchiefs should be brought back for the distaff population.

No can do man! Those 'head kerchiefs' look ugly on instagram.

by **DoomYoshi** on Wed Jul 19, 2017 2:44 pm

mrswdk wrote:We are often subjected to propaganda about how the Western world has for decades/centuries valued things such as elective representation or a fairly liberal print media. What the propagandists often omit from their broadcasts is the historical Western emphasis on modesty:

Dress code etiquette states that women wear hats for formal events, says Diana Mather, a senior tutor for The English Manner etiquette consultancy.

"Up until the 1950s ladies were very seldom seen without a hat as it was not considered 'the thing' for ladies to show their hair in public.

Women (and men) who walk around with exposed hair and flesh are non-Western, little better than anarchists, and should be sent to integration and assimilation classes immediately.

Clearly, you only read half the story. Here's the rest:

Paul wrote:I want you to understand that the head of every man is Christ, the head of a wife is her husband, and the head of Christ is God. Every man who prays or prophesies with his head covered dishonors his head, but every wife who prays or prophesies with her head uncovered dishonors her head, since it is the same as if her head were shaven. For if a wife will not cover her head, then she should cut her hair short. But since it is disgraceful for a wife to cut off her hair or shave her head, let her cover her head. For a man ought not to cover his head, since he is the image and glory of God, but woman is the glory of man. For man was not made from woman, but woman from man. Neither was man created for woman, but woman for man. That is why a wife ought to have a symbol of authority on her head, because of the angels. Nevertheless, in the Lord woman is not independent of man nor man of woman; for as woman was made from man, so man is now born of woman. And all things are from God. Judge for yourselves: is it proper for a wife to pray to God with her head uncovered? Does not nature itself teach you that if a man wears long hair it is a disgrace for him, but if a woman has long hair, it is her glory? For her hair is given to her for a covering. If anyone is inclined to be contentious, we have no such practice, nor do the churches of God.

by **Thorthoth** on Wed Jul 19, 2017 3:00 pm

DoomYoshi wrote:
mrswdk wrote:We are often subjected to propaganda about how the Western world has for decades/centuries valued things such as elective representation or a fairly liberal print media. What the propagandists often omit from their broadcasts is the historical Western emphasis on modesty:

Dress code etiquette states that women wear hats for formal events, says Diana Mather, a senior tutor for The English Manner etiquette consultancy.

"Up until the 1950s ladies were very seldom seen without a hat as it was not considered 'the thing' for ladies to show their hair in public.

Women (and men) who walk around with exposed hair and flesh are non-Western, little better than anarchists, and should be sent to integration and assimilation classes immediately.

Clearly, you only read half the story. Here's the rest:
Paul wrote:I want you to understand that the head of every man is Christ, the head of a wife is her husband, and the head of Christ is God. Every man who prays or prophesies with his head covered dishonors his head, but every wife who prays or prophesies with her head uncovered dishonors her head, since it is the same as if her head were shaven. For if a wife will not cover her head, then she should cut her hair short. But since it is disgraceful for a wife to cut off her hair or shave her head, let her cover her head. For a man ought not to cover his head, since he is the image and glory of God, but woman is the glory of man. For man was not made from woman, but woman from man. Neither was man created for woman, but woman for man. That is why a wife ought to have a symbol of authority on her head, because of the angels. Nevertheless, in the Lord woman is not independent of man nor man of woman; for as woman was made from man, so man is now born of woman. And all things are from God. Judge for yourselves: is it proper for a wife to pray to God with her head uncovered? Does not nature itself teach you that if a man wears long hair it is a disgrace for him, but if a woman has long hair, it is her glory? For her hair is given to her for a covering. If anyone is inclined to be contentious, we have no such practice, nor do the churches of God.

I find it interesting that when visiting Mecca a woman must keep her head covered, HOWEVER she is NOT permitted to veil her face. That makes a good argument that burkahs and such are actually anti-Islamic.

by **tzor** on Thu Jul 20, 2017 11:13 am

I think the best argument is the following (but hey this was the age of musicals, gender role reversals makes for a better comedy)

"You're not dressed yet ... just like a man."