saxitoxin wrote:karel wrote:this story has more holes then swiss cheese
Yes, to recap ...
(a) Democratic Party donor undergoing professional mental health treatment accuses judge of shoving her and touching her clothes when they were at a high school party 35 years ago.
(b) Tells Senator Dianne Feinstein who then withholds said information from both law enforcement and her own committee for two months; finally springs it a few days before a confirmation vote is set.
(c) The only person identified as a witness to the alleged shove by the accuser claims it never happened, as does the accused judge himself.
(d) Despite being a supposedly wild party, not a single other living person has been found who was present at it despite two months of searching.
This is as lucid as something you'd see on THC's
Ancient Aliens or
UFOs: The Truth the Government is Hiding. The Amazon Washington Post is basically the new alien conspiracy documentary. Bezos must not be letting the tabloid writers at the WaPo take bathroom breaks just like his warehouse workers.

I mean, I don't disagree with you but facts are virtually irrelevant at this point. The Democrats did a great job at politics with this one and lost a whole lot of virtue in the process. They likely held on to these accusations with the intent of releasing them after the hearings with the intent of not having new hearings with the intent of potentially winning the Senate in the mid-term elections potentially not confirming Trump's nominee for the Supreme Court upon Justice Kennedy's retirement. If you're scoring at home:
Democrats opposing the Kavanaugh nomination get (a) no Kavanaugh; (b) a 1 in 3 chance of no Trump nominee. Democrats opposing the Kavanaugh nomination also lose all credibility and standing on the MeToo Movement (Bill Clinton notwithstanding). I'd say that's a good trade for Democrats given the realistic alternative for people whose number one concern is the MeToo Movement is the Republican party.
spurgistan wrote: because they do this thing called "fact-checking". Reddit isn't literature.
I recall completely different circumstances - namely that the Washington Post realized it was being duped when an O'Keefe dude ran up to a car. There is no fact-checking going on with the Kavanaugh accusation and to pretend otherwise is just weird (and, like I keep typing, irrelevant). The damage has been done; it cannot be undone. Enough people will believe an accuser without evidence in a non-criminal trial that perceived popular opinion will affect Republicans' support of Kavanaugh negatively.
If I was in the White House, I would recommend pulling Kavanaugh, nominating the Notre Dame law school professor (who is WAY more conservative and WAY more likely to overturn Roe v. Wade and a woman) and take your chances with the mid-terms.