Biden Supporters Racing to Buy New Burberry Shirt

[saxitoxin]

Nordstrom has discounted a new Burberry t-shirt to $290 and Biden supporters are racing to pick up as many as they can. The t-shirt has an inspiring social justice message resonating with Biden / AOC voters.

https://www.nordstromrack.com/s/burberr ... erm=545655

[jimboston]

Nordstrom has discounted a new Burberry t-shirt to $290 and Biden supporters are racing to pick up as many as they can. The t-shirt has an inspiring social justice message resonating with Biden / AOC voters.

https://www.nordstromrack.com/s/burberr ... erm=545655

Where does this indicate it’s marketed to “Biden supporters” or “AOC voters”.

I voted for Biden and have no interest in this shirt.

I’m sure that many people who didn’t and can’t vote for AOC (because they aren’t in her district) might buy it.

I don’t think you are accurately describing the marketing strategy of this company.

Do you admit Trump in incapable of showing love?
That’s what the “inspirational message” says.

Personally I don’t think it’s very inspiring... nor as a human or as a “Biden supporter”... nor as a nom-liberal moderate.

[saxitoxin]

Nordstrom has discounted a new Burberry t-shirt to $290 and Biden supporters are racing to pick up as many as they can. The t-shirt has an inspiring social justice message resonating with Biden / AOC voters.

https://www.nordstromrack.com/s/burberr ... erm=545655

Where does this indicate it’s marketed to “Biden supporters” or “AOC voters”.

Yeah, Trump voters are going to buy it.

[DoomYoshi]

I voted for Biden

So you admit to committing fraud.

[jimboston]

I voted for Biden

So you admit to committing fraud.

I think in the world of Trump and his delusional supporters the answer is yes.

These psychos essentially trying to label legitimate votes from people with opposing views as ‘fraud’.

[jimboston]

Nordstrom has discounted a new Burberry t-shirt to $290 and Biden supporters are racing to pick up as many as they can. The t-shirt has an inspiring social justice message resonating with Biden / AOC voters.

https://www.nordstromrack.com/s/burberr ... erm=545655

Where does this indicate it’s marketed to “Biden supporters” or “AOC voters”.

Yeah, Trump voters are going to buy it.

I don’t see anyone buying it.
I’m not sure who it’s marketed to, but I don’t see evidence specifying a political division.

You may need to go learn about the art and business of marketing before you start talking about that field.
Otherwise you sound like an idiot.

[DoomYoshi]

I voted for Biden

So you admit to committing fraud.

I think in the world of Trump and his delusional supporters the answer is yes.

These psychos essentially trying to label legitimate votes from people with opposing views as ‘fraud’.

They aren't legitimate votes though. It requires an IQ of about 20 to be toilet trained, much more to be able to type and play RISK online. Since you post here, it means your IQ is above the threshold to realize that Biden is a ludicrous choice.

So you can't have legitimately voted for Biden based on intellect. You don't get to plead insanity.
You are not dead, or an illegal voter, or a terrorist, or a foreign mobster, so you can't have voted for Biden on any of those grounds.

There is a slim chance that you are a corporate fatcat who owns Monsanto or a pharmaceutical company or a tech company (these are the companies that say stocks go up after Biden was elected). Perhaps you voted for Biden on those grounds.

The only other possible reason is fraud. You know that a vote for Biden means that you hate life, liberty and America. Yet you still decided to vote for Biden even though you don't really hate life, liberty and America - you just want people to think you do.

[HitRed]

[jimboston]

I voted for Biden

So you admit to committing fraud.

I think in the world of Trump and his delusional supporters the answer is yes.

These psychos essentially trying to label legitimate votes from people with opposing views as ‘fraud’.

They aren't legitimate votes though. It requires an IQ of about 20 to be toilet trained, much more to be able to type and play RISK online. Since you post here, it means your IQ is above the threshold to realize that Biden is a ludicrous choice.

So you can't have legitimately voted for Biden based on intellect. You don't get to plead insanity.
You are not dead, or an illegal voter, or a terrorist, or a foreign mobster, so you can't have voted for Biden on any of those grounds.

There is a slim chance that you are a corporate fatcat who owns Monsanto or a pharmaceutical company or a tech company (these are the companies that say stocks go up after Biden was elected). Perhaps you voted for Biden on those grounds.

The only other possible reason is fraud. You know that a vote for Biden means that you hate life, liberty and America. Yet you still decided to vote for Biden even though you don't really hate life, liberty and America - you just want people to think you do.

Your logic fails and you’re not even funny.

Keep trying. If you practice enough you might get to Saxi’s level in a year or two.
(Still not very high, but compared to the drivel you’re producing it’s a noticeable improvement.)

[rdsrds2120]

Since when is Reason necessary to certify the legitimacy of a vote? There are legal stipulations to what constitutes a legitimate vote, and what people answer to "why did you vote for this person?" is not one of them.

I think you're welcome to think of votes for Biden as errors in judgment on the individual level (I would disagree, and that's also fine), but describing the votes as illegitimate for the reason you stated is not supported by any metric adjacent to election law or some other convincing motivator.

[mookiemcgee]

Since when is Reason necessary to certify the legitimacy of a vote? There are legal stipulations to what constitutes a legitimate vote, and what people answer to "why did you vote for this person?" is not one of them.

I think you're welcome to think of votes for Biden as errors in judgment on the individual level (I would disagree, and that's also fine), but describing the votes as illegitimate for the reason you stated is not supported by any metric adjacent to election law or some other convincing motivator.

I don't know what you think you are doing trying to make sense here... This thread is only for trolls, and a few clinically insane non-trolls. If you are clinically insane please start acting like it, you are not a troll.

[DoomYoshi]

Since when is Reason necessary to certify the legitimacy of a vote? There are legal stipulations to what constitutes a legitimate vote, and what people answer to "why did you vote for this person?" is not one of them.

I think you're welcome to think of votes for Biden as errors in judgment on the individual level (I would disagree, and that's also fine), but describing the votes as illegitimate for the reason you stated is not supported by any metric adjacent to election law or some other convincing motivator.

Right. But in this case, committing fraud is a felony, and felons are not allowed to vote (because they are assumed to have nefarious reasons). Perceived lack of "good reason" is the only reason suffrage has been denied to commoners, women, religious minorities, illiterate folk etc.

For the dead people and ISIS bombers who actually voted for Biden, their reasons are tantamount to treason, which is also a felony.

[saxitoxin]

Just checked, it turns out DY won the thread!

Congrats DY!



Unfortunately, it's been determined by impartial reviewers that Gym lost for the 10th time in a row. Sorry, Gym!

[jimboston]

Since when is Reason necessary to certify the legitimacy of a vote? There are legal stipulations to what constitutes a legitimate vote, and what people answer to "why did you vote for this person?" is not one of them.

I think you're welcome to think of votes for Biden as errors in judgment on the individual level (I would disagree, and that's also fine), but describing the votes as illegitimate for the reason you stated is not supported by any metric adjacent to election law or some other convincing motivator.

I don't know what you think you are doing trying to make sense here... This thread is only for trolls, and a few clinically insane non-trolls. If you are clinically insane please start acting like it, you are not a troll.

I’m curious to find out if you think I fall in the first category or the second.

(If I am clinically insane it’s only because I continue to fall into the trap of arguing with trolls.)

[jimboston]

Right. But in this case, committing fraud is a felony, and felons are not allowed to vote (because they are assumed to have nefarious reasons). Perceived lack of "good reason" is the only reason suffrage has been denied to commoners, women, religious minorities, illiterate folk etc.

For the dead people and ISIS bombers who actually voted for Biden, their reasons are tantamount to treason, which is also a felony.

Just checked, it turns out DY won the thread!

Congrats DY!

Unfortunately, it's been determined by impartial reviewers that Gym lost for the 10th time in a row. Sorry, Gym!

Saxi if you and DY agree that we could deny suffrage to “commoners, women, religious minorities, illiterate folk, etc.”... then I guess we could end all arguments. I guarantee that people not falling into those categories would overwhelming vote for Biden. Yes he’s lose a ton of votes... but Trump would lose almost all his votes. Instead of a 51.4% to 46.9% victory, we’d be looking at a landslide along the 80/20 range in favor of Biden.

[mookiemcgee]

Since when is Reason necessary to certify the legitimacy of a vote? There are legal stipulations to what constitutes a legitimate vote, and what people answer to "why did you vote for this person?" is not one of them.

I think you're welcome to think of votes for Biden as errors in judgment on the individual level (I would disagree, and that's also fine), but describing the votes as illegitimate for the reason you stated is not supported by any metric adjacent to election law or some other convincing motivator.

I don't know what you think you are doing trying to make sense here... This thread is only for trolls, and a few clinically insane non-trolls. If you are clinically insane please start acting like it, you are not a troll.

I’m curious to find out if you think I fall in the first category or the second.

(If I am clinically insane it’s only because I continue to fall into the trap of arguing with trolls.)

[jimboston]

Thank you for the clarification.

[mookiemcgee]

Thank you for the clarification.

mookie=helping