Conquer Club

[OFFICIAL] Charle's Fun Mafia - "Game On" No more entries

FOS: Dedicated those who can't get enough Mafia action. Ongoing Games located here!

Moderator: Community Team

Forum rules
Please read the Community Guidelines before posting.

Re: [OFFICIAL] Charle's Fun Mafia - "Game On" No more entrie

Postby chanakam2020 on Wed Sep 03, 2025 7:03 am

Extreme Ways wrote:
SoN!c wrote:
Ragian wrote:What the...

One thing is Son!c OMGUS'ing completely (he attacks me because I have attacked him - typical scum tell), but what are you guys doing bringing AI into this game of psychology and social awareness? I agee with DDS - in spirit not wording (although I appreciate how he has apologised, which takes character) - and I agree with hjelp. Basically, rule 4 has been broken. Obviously, I expect Charle to handle that.


First of all old man with memory issues the game was not talked in pm or any other way with somebody else outside this forum.

So under the non updated rules that was not a violation.

Second chatgtp said you are slighty town (just paranoid). So that is not an attack i believe. It said kongming's answer had scum traits not you.

I am not going to read or infer anything based on what an AI has said about someone else, but you kind of dispute your own point about rule 4. "XYZ said you are slightly town" in which XYZ is not a player, is breaking at the very least the spirit of the rule. I think DDS and Rag have perfectly established why having someone or something else make reads for you is not part of social deduction. DDS' response I will treat as not indicative of their alignment.

I had been softly pushing Chana for being all bone no meat in his contributions to thread and it kinda follows. I was hoping Chana would respond to me calling him out, but alas.

Vote Chanakam
Maybe this will inspire more of a response.


What kind of response are you expecting from me ?
Here in this reply I posted my Apology, I explained my intention about using ChatGPT & My Promise for not using ChatGPT or any similar thing again.

https://www.conquerclub.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=213&t=242743&start=325#p5364247
.
.
And I did not think it as discussion outside the forum thread when I am doing it at posting it here.
ChatGPT is not a human and for me it is use of a software.
If I use some software like Excel sheet or Google sheet to mark things about each player and use python code extract keywords from forum posts I do not think it consider as a discussion?
And before charles updated Rule No : 04 there was no mention about using software in that rule.
.
Anyway the Game MOD decided it as violation of rules & he gave me a penaly and I accpted it.

So after all that why still dragging discussion of ChatGPT & AI ?

Explain me what kind of response you expecting from me by voting me after all those above explanations by me and Charles ?


#-o #-o #-o #-o #-o
Image
Image
User avatar
Major chanakam2020
Community Team
Community Team
 
Posts: 824
Joined: Thu Feb 06, 2020 11:12 am
8102322

Re: [OFFICIAL] Charle's Fun Mafia - "Game On" No more entrie

Postby halrob64 on Wed Sep 03, 2025 7:50 am

I think Chan made a genuine mistake, he is a nice guy regardless of what role he is playing in the game. As far as I see Charlie has amended the rules, there is no more need to AI chat, lets get on with the game in the spirit it is intended to be played in.
What I want to know is: Where is Max "Headroom" Maxleod and his furtive cohorts?
User avatar
Corporal halrob64
 
Posts: 31
Joined: Tue Mar 10, 2020 12:39 pm
Location: England
2

Re: [OFFICIAL] Charle's Fun Mafia - "Game On" No more entrie

Postby SoN!c on Wed Sep 03, 2025 9:27 am

Im with Chanakam and Loose. It was just a funny thing to read.

Im sure if Chanakam would ask the same question today that AI chatbot would cook up a whole different picking order and give a whole different reasoning. People here seem to believe AI already knows who is scum by AI analysing. That is bullshit. Like i said it will give "yes but it could be no too" and vice versa answers on subjects like this..only when it can find scientific pages it will quote them correct. Some day AI will be genius level yes but that is still far from now.

Funny babblefish drool by some chatbot.

Do i believe Kongming is scum because that chatbot said it had scum traits? No. Not one bit. But it was funny to read.

Kongming didn't even react.. he knows that AI babblefish is horseshoe puddled shit. But DDS went nuts when AI called him out. So that was fishy and one thing lead to another..

That is all this big fuss is about. Lets call this storm in a beerglass over.

And get back on track with this great game. I hope with a DDS that sees the public excuses by Chanakam. We are all people and whoever is without a fault throw the first stone. Im not.
Image
User avatar
Colonel SoN!c
 
Posts: 904
Joined: Tue May 11, 2021 10:23 am
Location: Going supersonic, be there in 30 seconds!

Re: [OFFICIAL] Charle's Fun Mafia - "Game On" No more entrie

Postby Darin44 on Wed Sep 03, 2025 10:42 am

with all that said let get to D2 because I don't like all this AI stuff

unvote, vote no lynch
User avatar
Corporal 1st Class Darin44
Tournament Director
Tournament Director
 
Posts: 6149
Joined: Sun Dec 23, 2007 11:21 pm
Location: Coos Bay, Oregon
222

Re: [OFFICIAL] Charle's Fun Mafia - "Game On" No more entrie

Postby Loose Canon on Wed Sep 03, 2025 12:47 pm

Extreme Ways wrote:
SoN!c wrote:
Ragian wrote:What the...

One thing is Son!c OMGUS'ing completely (he attacks me because I have attacked him - typical scum tell), but what are you guys doing bringing AI into this game of psychology and social awareness? I agee with DDS - in spirit not wording (although I appreciate how he has apologised, which takes character) - and I agree with hjelp. Basically, rule 4 has been broken. Obviously, I expect Charle to handle that.


First of all old man with memory issues the game was not talked in pm or any other way with somebody else outside this forum.

So under the non updated rules that was not a violation.

Second chatgtp said you are slighty town (just paranoid). So that is not an attack i believe. It said kongming's answer had scum traits not you.

I am not going to read or infer anything based on what an AI has said about someone else, but you kind of dispute your own point about rule 4. "XYZ said you are slightly town" in which XYZ is not a player, is breaking at the very least the spirit of the rule. I think DDS and Rag have perfectly established why having someone or something else make reads for you is not part of social deduction. DDS' response I will treat as not indicative of their alignment.

I had been softly pushing Chana for being all bone no meat in his contributions to thread and it kinda follows. I was hoping Chana would respond to me calling him out, but alas.

Vote Chanakam
Maybe this will inspire more of a response.


Nothing wrong with your argument up to your vote extreme.
It's the vote and the maybe this will inspire more of a response bit that raises my eyebrows.

There's not going to be a lynch D1.
You might get 3 or 4 votes on Chana.

So what was the vote and the maybe inspiring after justification about?

Maybe you want to hold more sway over town votes D2 onwards.
A town extreme is usually resigned to being a mafia target asap.
Setting up to hold sway D2 onwards would be more mafia extreme.

If town has a cop reasonable to think mafia might have a framer.
Maybe lining Chana up to be investigated and framed.

The timing of your attack on Chana was opportune.
The vote and after vote justification has raised my eyebrows, just a bit of opportunity a mafia extreme couldn't resist perhaps.
[img]http://img195.imageshack.us/img195/97/ic2u.png[/img]
Colonel Loose Canon
 
Posts: 352
Joined: Sat Jan 08, 2011 9:11 am
223

Re: [OFFICIAL] Charle's Fun Mafia - "Game On" No more entrie

Postby Extreme Ways on Wed Sep 03, 2025 12:48 pm

SoN!c wrote:Let’s slow this down a bit. Mafia only works if everyone’s on the same page about what counts as fair play.

Using AI tools like ChatGPT mid-game to "help" with reads or arguments is not ok and i get it "undermines" the whole point of social deduction. But i don't think Chanakam (not "chang") had intent whatsoever doing so.

That said, flaming each other about it won’t solve anything by all means. Blowing up the thread does neither. You make a comment and Charle can decide whether it’s a warning, a sub, or a modkill. But this way with this "sober" slander it's blown completely out of porportion. DDS his reaction is out the ball park. The ball he lauched and the flaming intensity it empowers made it fly into space, last seen near Voyager 1..

Let’s keep the focus on the game itself, and let the rules enforcement be handled by the mod only.

Charle will do a great job handling it.

And in the spirit of good sportsmanship i"ll unvote

Hooooold the phone, you never voted Chana for any ChatGPT related stuff. So why unvote?
TOFU, ex-REP, ex-VDLL, ex-KoRT.
User avatar
General Extreme Ways
 
Posts: 1731
Joined: Sun Nov 19, 2006 10:02 am
2

Re: [OFFICIAL] Charle's Fun Mafia - "Game On" No more entrie

Postby Extreme Ways on Wed Sep 03, 2025 12:50 pm

Extreme Ways wrote:
Devante wrote:So I see not much has really changed in my absence other then a possible town PR claim maybe not a claim. Anything of further interest? I'm all for a lynch D1 as that's our only town weapon to use but right now no one is jumping out as scum to me

The PR claim is a claim and should be ignored for elimination.

chanakam2020 wrote:
SoN!c wrote:Heads up: Im flying to greece (crete) the day after tomorrow for two weeks. I'll be checking in around bed time or breakast (whenever breakfast time is :D ) from time to time.


Sound like you are going for a Mafia Dons meeting.

Vote SoN!c

:shock: :shock: :shock:

Explain?

show


FP'd by Sonic, inclined to follow

@Chanakam, I voted you for this. Not for any other thing. I dont notice any attempt at solving the game.
TOFU, ex-REP, ex-VDLL, ex-KoRT.
User avatar
General Extreme Ways
 
Posts: 1731
Joined: Sun Nov 19, 2006 10:02 am
2

Re: [OFFICIAL] Charle's Fun Mafia - "Game On" No more entrie

Postby chanakam2020 on Wed Sep 03, 2025 1:20 pm

Extreme Ways wrote:@Chanakam, I voted you for this. Not for any other thing. I dont notice any attempt at solving the game.


1. viewtopic.php?f=213&t=242743&start=75#p5363202
2. viewtopic.php?f=213&t=242743&start=100#p5363260
3. viewtopic.php?f=213&t=242743&start=150#p5363485
4. viewtopic.php?f=213&t=242743&start=175#p5363626
5. viewtopic.php?f=213&t=242743&start=225#p5363835

Read my above replies to this thread and tell me what was I doing all this time other than attempting to solving the game. ?
.
I am trying to do some logical reasoning which can convince my brain on solid facts.
The only solid fact known to me up to now in this game is Halrobs claim of town power role.
And I came to a solid conclusion that I should not vote to lynch Halrob on D-1.
.
This is my 3rd game and other two games I played couple of years ago.
So I am not experienced solver as you.
Your way of attempting to solve game should be different and more elegant than mine.

8-[ 8-[ 8-[
Image
Image
User avatar
Major chanakam2020
Community Team
Community Team
 
Posts: 824
Joined: Thu Feb 06, 2020 11:12 am
8102322

Re: [OFFICIAL] Charle's Fun Mafia - "Game On" No more entrie

Postby SoN!c on Wed Sep 03, 2025 1:51 pm

Extreme Ways wrote:
SoN!c wrote:Let’s slow this down a bit. Mafia only works if everyone’s on the same page about what counts as fair play.

Using AI tools like ChatGPT mid-game to "help" with reads or arguments is not ok and i get it "undermines" the whole point of social deduction. But i don't think Chanakam (not "chang") had intent whatsoever doing so.

That said, flaming each other about it won’t solve anything by all means. Blowing up the thread does neither. You make a comment and Charle can decide whether it’s a warning, a sub, or a modkill. But this way with this "sober" slander it's blown completely out of porportion. DDS his reaction is out the ball park. The ball he lauched and the flaming intensity it empowers made it fly into space, last seen near Voyager 1..

Let’s keep the focus on the game itself, and let the rules enforcement be handled by the mod only.

Charle will do a great job handling it.

And in the spirit of good sportsmanship i"ll unvote

Hooooold the phone, you never voted Chana for any ChatGPT related stuff. So why unvote?


:roll: im voting DDS
Image
User avatar
Colonel SoN!c
 
Posts: 904
Joined: Tue May 11, 2021 10:23 am
Location: Going supersonic, be there in 30 seconds!

Re: [OFFICIAL] Charle's Fun Mafia - "Game On" No more entrie

Postby Maxleod on Wed Sep 03, 2025 2:05 pm

DirtyDishSoap wrote:Oh no, i was sober when all this nonsense started. Drunk now, but you're a damn fool for allowing this. Apology be damned, but if this allowed, and in some god forsaken future i get dragged into mafia on this site again, you, Chana, Loose and I hate Max because he does f*ck all, are black listed just for defending this. I can abide with alot, but absolute ignorance i cannot, and of you four have displayed the most. I wish you all the best, that's I'll i can say, but I'm not doing this again.


Come a again? When exactly did I defend it? Besides, Chatgpt puts me #1 on the suspects list and I just don't care because I never thought ppl were seriously gonna even consider it valuable input (chatgpt's that is).

You're overreacting. Pretty sure nobody gives any credit to a bot in the context of Mafia. This is not chess.
User avatar
Sergeant 1st Class Maxleod
 
Posts: 581
Joined: Wed Nov 04, 2015 7:08 am
Location: DARDIS (Drunkness And Relative Dimensions In Sleep)

Re: [OFFICIAL] Charle's Fun Mafia - "Game On" No more entrie

Postby Charle on Thu Sep 04, 2025 3:02 am

Vote Count:

Chanakan (3) - Kong, DDS, EW
Halrob (2) - Max, Devon
Sonic (1) - Ragian
Kong (1) - hjelp

No Lynch (3) - Loose, Halrob, Darin

With 13 Alive - 7 needed for a lynch
User avatar
Major Charle
SoC Training Instructor
SoC Training Instructor
 
Posts: 1814
Joined: Fri Mar 05, 2010 9:11 am
Location: South Africa

Re: [OFFICIAL] Charle's Fun Mafia - "Game On" No more entrie

Postby Charle on Thu Sep 04, 2025 3:31 am

Kingm replaced DDS.

The vote from DDS against Chana still stands until King decides to change the vote.

Welcome King, enjoy the game and thanks for standing in!

Have fun!!
User avatar
Major Charle
SoC Training Instructor
SoC Training Instructor
 
Posts: 1814
Joined: Fri Mar 05, 2010 9:11 am
Location: South Africa

Re: [OFFICIAL] Charle's Fun Mafia - "Game On" No more entrie

Postby Kingm on Thu Sep 04, 2025 3:36 am

Charle wrote:Kingm replaced DDS.

The vote from DDS against Chana still stands until King decides to change the vote.

Welcome King, enjoy the game and thanks for standing in!

Have fun!!


My pleasure, I was kicking myself for withdrawing, so I'm happy to playing now.
I have been eagerly following the game, but just as a neutral spectator, now I probably have to read it all again.

For now Unvote Chana, have to make up my own mind first.
User avatar
General Kingm
 
Posts: 874
Joined: Thu Oct 06, 2011 7:54 pm
Location: Norway
42

Re: [OFFICIAL] Charle's Fun Mafia - "Game On" No more entrie

Postby SoN!c on Thu Sep 04, 2025 4:05 am

Welcome Kingm !

Very happy Kingm is here xD

But also a bit dissapointed in DDS
Image
User avatar
Colonel SoN!c
 
Posts: 904
Joined: Tue May 11, 2021 10:23 am
Location: Going supersonic, be there in 30 seconds!

Re: [OFFICIAL] Charle's Fun Mafia - "Game On" No more entrie

Postby SoN!c on Thu Sep 04, 2025 4:41 am

And just a quickie in case i don't make it tomorrow (on holiday).

Extra protection legal note warning: if i should die tonight a hard copy of all my evidence towards DDS (Kingm now) will be send to the newspapers!
Image
User avatar
Colonel SoN!c
 
Posts: 904
Joined: Tue May 11, 2021 10:23 am
Location: Going supersonic, be there in 30 seconds!

Re: [OFFICIAL] Charle's Fun Mafia - "Game On" No more entrie

Postby Extreme Ways on Thu Sep 04, 2025 5:16 am

chanakam2020 wrote:
Extreme Ways wrote:@Chanakam, I voted you for this. Not for any other thing. I dont notice any attempt at solving the game.


1. viewtopic.php?f=213&t=242743&start=75#p5363202
2. viewtopic.php?f=213&t=242743&start=100#p5363260
3. viewtopic.php?f=213&t=242743&start=150#p5363485
4. viewtopic.php?f=213&t=242743&start=175#p5363626
5. viewtopic.php?f=213&t=242743&start=225#p5363835

Read my above replies to this thread and tell me what was I doing all this time other than attempting to solving the game. ?
.
I am trying to do some logical reasoning which can convince my brain on solid facts.
The only solid fact known to me up to now in this game is Halrobs claim of town power role.
And I came to a solid conclusion that I should not vote to lynch Halrob on D-1.
.
This is my 3rd game and other two games I played couple of years ago.
So I am not experienced solver as you.
Your way of attempting to solve game should be different and more elegant than mine.

8-[ 8-[ 8-[

Most of these I would call information instead of analysis.

The number of replies each person has gives me nothing to see if you are trying to figure out someone else's alignment, it's public info. Harping on about role confirmation could be newbie mode, but could also be played up newbie mode.

Asking about lying is the same. It's not figuring out the players in the game, but figuring out the game.

Your hesitancy on bringing Halrob to L-1 is indeed a post worthy of some alignment. And while I think most of your post on "L'état, c'est moi" is again not really game related, it does in the end signal your intentions so I will count it too.

But given that you yourself brought up this as a solving post:
chanakam2020 wrote:I am waiting to hear from Halrob & Rogue
or
Charles official stand about their silence
+
Waiting to hear from Max about protocol breach
or
Charles official stand about Max not following the protocol

:idea: :idea: :idea:

What did you get out of waiting? What made you decide to wait instead of not waiting?
TOFU, ex-REP, ex-VDLL, ex-KoRT.
User avatar
General Extreme Ways
 
Posts: 1731
Joined: Sun Nov 19, 2006 10:02 am
2

Re: [OFFICIAL] Charle's Fun Mafia - "Game On" No more entrie

Postby Extreme Ways on Thu Sep 04, 2025 5:20 am

SoN!c wrote:
Extreme Ways wrote:
SoN!c wrote:Let’s slow this down a bit. Mafia only works if everyone’s on the same page about what counts as fair play.

Using AI tools like ChatGPT mid-game to "help" with reads or arguments is not ok and i get it "undermines" the whole point of social deduction. But i don't think Chanakam (not "chang") had intent whatsoever doing so.

That said, flaming each other about it won’t solve anything by all means. Blowing up the thread does neither. You make a comment and Charle can decide whether it’s a warning, a sub, or a modkill. But this way with this "sober" slander it's blown completely out of porportion. DDS his reaction is out the ball park. The ball he lauched and the flaming intensity it empowers made it fly into space, last seen near Voyager 1..

Let’s keep the focus on the game itself, and let the rules enforcement be handled by the mod only.

Charle will do a great job handling it.

And in the spirit of good sportsmanship i"ll unvote

Hooooold the phone, you never voted Chana for any ChatGPT related stuff. So why unvote?


:roll: im voting DDS

my bad
TOFU, ex-REP, ex-VDLL, ex-KoRT.
User avatar
General Extreme Ways
 
Posts: 1731
Joined: Sun Nov 19, 2006 10:02 am
2

Re: [OFFICIAL] Charle's Fun Mafia - "Game On" No more entrie

Postby Extreme Ways on Thu Sep 04, 2025 5:21 am

Kingm wrote:
Charle wrote:Kingm replaced DDS.

The vote from DDS against Chana still stands until King decides to change the vote.

Welcome King, enjoy the game and thanks for standing in!

Have fun!!


My pleasure, I was kicking myself for withdrawing, so I'm happy to playing now.
I have been eagerly following the game, but just as a neutral spectator, now I probably have to read it all again.

For now Unvote Chana, have to make up my own mind first.

Why do you have to read it again?

Does your rolecard tell you you need to push out townies?
TOFU, ex-REP, ex-VDLL, ex-KoRT.
User avatar
General Extreme Ways
 
Posts: 1731
Joined: Sun Nov 19, 2006 10:02 am
2

Re: [OFFICIAL] Charle's Fun Mafia - "Game On" No more entrie

Postby chanakam2020 on Thu Sep 04, 2025 5:32 am

Extreme Ways wrote:Your hesitancy on bringing Halrob to L-1 is indeed a post worthy of some alignment.


How can I put Halrob to L-1 . Because when Halrob was put to L-2 & when he made claim my vote is already in that 5 votes there and
I cannot vote twice. And Explain me why you expected to put some one claimed town power role to L-1 after he claimed power role & there was no counter claim. Now this is very suspecious to me.
8-) 8-) 8-)


Extreme Ways wrote:Most of these I would call information instead of analysis.

I do not know how to do analysis without gathering information.
OK , then show me some analysis you did on this game & explain me logics behind your analysis?

Extreme Ways wrote:But given that you yourself brought up this as a solving post:
chanakam2020 wrote:I am waiting to hear from Halrob & Rogue
or
Charles official stand about their silence
+
Waiting to hear from Max about protocol breach
or
Charles official stand about Max not following the protocol

:idea: :idea: :idea:

What did you get out of waiting? What made you decide to wait instead of not waiting?


Again I was waiting for solid information before analysis & come to a conclusion. Becaue I did not know whether Halrob & Rogue were asked by Game MOD to stay silent or not.
Tell me what did you do to slove game during that period ?

:ugeek: :ugeek: :ugeek:
Image
Image
User avatar
Major chanakam2020
Community Team
Community Team
 
Posts: 824
Joined: Thu Feb 06, 2020 11:12 am
8102322

Previous

Return to Mafia Games

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users