Conquer Club

new freestyle loophole

Talk about all things related to Conquer Club

Moderator: Community Team

Forum rules
Please read the community guidelines before posting.

new freestyle loophole

Postby JOHNNYROCKET24 on Thu Oct 25, 2007 6:24 am

forgive me for the double post, but I thought this might deserve a new topic


round 1

player A moves
player B moves

round 2

player A doesnt move in 12 hours

player B moves
player A moves

round 3

player B moves


player B made 3 of the last 4 moves just because player A dint move within 12 hours. thats worse than a forced missed turn. we made the loophole worse than it was. unless im missing something here ?
_________________
JR's Game Profile

show
User avatar
Captain JOHNNYROCKET24
 
Posts: 5514
Joined: Mon May 08, 2006 4:11 am
Location: among the leets
52

Postby firth4eva on Thu Oct 25, 2007 6:27 am

Yes. You are missing the point that nobody cares.
User avatar
Captain firth4eva
 
Posts: 6188
Joined: Sat Mar 03, 2007 7:20 am

Postby chessplaya on Thu Oct 25, 2007 6:31 am

firth4eva wrote:Yes. You are missing the point that nobody cares.


:lol: :lol:
Veni...
Vidi...
Vici...
Captain chessplaya
 
Posts: 1875
Joined: Sat Jan 20, 2007 1:46 pm

Postby Elwar on Thu Oct 25, 2007 6:36 am

How is that worse :?
Lieutenant Elwar
 
Posts: 135
Joined: Tue Jun 12, 2007 1:22 am

Postby Iliad on Thu Oct 25, 2007 6:44 am

firth4eva wrote:Yes. You are missing the point that nobody cares.

:lol:

And no Johhny there isn't anything broken here
User avatar
Private 1st Class Iliad
 
Posts: 10394
Joined: Mon Mar 05, 2007 12:48 am

Postby orion_ on Thu Oct 25, 2007 6:47 am

firth4eva wrote:Yes. You are missing the point that nobody cares.
Corporal 1st Class orion_
 
Posts: 43
Joined: Sun Sep 23, 2007 10:48 am
Location: parent's basement

Re: new freestyle loophole

Postby wicked on Thu Oct 25, 2007 6:49 am

Yes we changed the fact that B will no longer be suprised and lose armies. Player A can still delay 23.9 hours and get a defacto double turn, but this way he doesn't screw B.
User avatar
Major wicked
 
Posts: 15787
Joined: Thu Jan 26, 2006 1:23 pm

Re: new freestyle loophole

Postby autoload on Thu Oct 25, 2007 7:05 am

wicked wrote:Yes we changed the fact that B will no longer be suprised and lose armies. Player A can still delay 23.9 hours and get a defacto double turn, but this way he doesn't screw B.


Will Player B get screwed if Player A delays 23.91 hours?
User avatar
Major autoload
 
Posts: 3735
Joined: Wed Apr 19, 2006 12:37 am

Re: new freestyle loophole

Postby gimil on Thu Oct 25, 2007 7:07 am

autoload wrote:
wicked wrote:Yes we changed the fact that B will no longer be suprised and lose armies. Player A can still delay 23.9 hours and get a defacto double turn, but this way he doesn't screw B.


Will Player B get screwed if Player A delays 23.91 hours?


not anymore
What do you know about map making, bitch?

natty_dread wrote:I was wrong


Top Score:2403
User avatar
Corporal 1st Class gimil
 
Posts: 8599
Joined: Sat Mar 03, 2007 12:42 pm
Location: United Kingdom (Scotland)

Re: new freestyle loophole

Postby Telvannia on Thu Oct 25, 2007 7:10 am

gimil wrote:
autoload wrote:
wicked wrote:Yes we changed the fact that B will no longer be suprised and lose armies. Player A can still delay 23.9 hours and get a defacto double turn, but this way he doesn't screw B.


Will Player B get screwed if Player A delays 23.91 hours?


not anymore



I hate to piss on your bonfires, player A would deadbeat if he delayed 23.91 hours 3 goes consecutively :lol: :roll:
User avatar
Sergeant 1st Class Telvannia
 
Posts: 1331
Joined: Mon Apr 24, 2006 7:19 am

Postby oVo on Thu Oct 25, 2007 7:51 am

Excluding a missed go, by the end of round 3 both players will have taken three turns.
User avatar
Major oVo
 
Posts: 3864
Joined: Fri Jan 26, 2007 1:41 pm
Location: Antarctica

Re: new freestyle loophole

Postby JOHNNYROCKET24 on Thu Oct 25, 2007 8:00 am

wicked wrote:Yes we changed the fact that B will no longer be suprised and lose armies. Player A can still delay 23.9 hours and get a defacto double turn, but this way he doesn't screw B.


screw player B? he gets to make 3 turns to player A's 1 including back to back. that is huge.
JR's Game Profile

show
User avatar
Captain JOHNNYROCKET24
 
Posts: 5514
Joined: Mon May 08, 2006 4:11 am
Location: among the leets
52

Re: new freestyle loophole

Postby Genghis Khan CA on Thu Oct 25, 2007 8:20 am

JOHNNYROCKET24 wrote:forgive me for the double post, but I thought this might deserve a new topic


round 1

player A moves
player B moves

round 2

player A doesnt move in 12 hours

player B moves
player A moves

round 3

player B moves


player B made 3 of the last 4 moves just because player A dint move within 12 hours. thats worse than a forced missed turn. we made the loophole worse than it was. unless im missing something here ?


JR how is this any worse than:

"round 1

player A moves
player B moves

round 2

player A moves after 23.95 hours

player B misses a turn

round 3

player A moves"

Which is what happened under the old system.

Again, player A has made 3 out of the last 4 moves, but player B misses a turn completely. Under the new system no one is forced to miss a turn. In addition, under your scenario player A at least has the opportunity to play within 12 hours and get his turn in first in round 2.

So in summary yes you are missing something, the rules are much fairer now than they have been in the past, and freestyle is always going to throw up some oddities in terms of turn order. At least forced missed turns are no longer possible which is a change for the better.
Highest score: 562
Highest place: 16590
Highest rank: Private
User avatar
Brigadier Genghis Khan CA
 
Posts: 727
Joined: Mon Nov 13, 2006 11:19 pm

Postby wicked on Thu Oct 25, 2007 8:22 am

Thank you Genghis. That's exactly what I was trying to say this morning, but had just woken up. :lol:
User avatar
Major wicked
 
Posts: 15787
Joined: Thu Jan 26, 2006 1:23 pm

Postby MeDeFe on Thu Oct 25, 2007 8:25 am

And of course, if Johnny is worried he might always do something like this:

round 1

Johnny moves
player B moves

round 2

Johnny doesnt move in 12 hours

player B moves
Johnny doesn't move

round 3

Johnny moves and gets double armies
player B curses and tries to salvage what's left.
User avatar
Major MeDeFe
 
Posts: 7831
Joined: Thu Apr 06, 2006 2:48 am
Location: Follow the trail of holes in other people's arguments.

Re: new freestyle loophole

Postby JOHNNYROCKET24 on Thu Oct 25, 2007 8:29 am

Genghis Khan CA wrote:
JOHNNYROCKET24 wrote:forgive me for the double post, but I thought this might deserve a new topic


round 1

player A moves
player B moves

round 2

player A doesnt move in 12 hours

player B moves
player A moves

round 3

player B moves


player B made 3 of the last 4 moves just because player A dint move within 12 hours. thats worse than a forced missed turn. we made the loophole worse than it was. unless im missing something here ?


JR how is this any worse than:

"round 1

player A moves
player B moves

round 2

player A moves after 23.95 hours

player B misses a turn

round 3

player A moves"

Which is what happened under the old system.

Again, player A has made 3 out of the last 4 moves, but player B misses a turn completely. Under the new system no one is forced to miss a turn. In addition, under your scenario player A at least has the opportunity to play within 12 hours and get his turn in first in round 2.

So in summary yes you are missing something, the rules are much fairer now than they have been in the past, and freestyle is always going to throw up some oddities in terms of turn order. At least forced missed turns are no longer possible which is a change for the better.


understood- yeah I missed the 3 turns out of 4 in the old system
JR's Game Profile

show
User avatar
Captain JOHNNYROCKET24
 
Posts: 5514
Joined: Mon May 08, 2006 4:11 am
Location: among the leets
52

Re: new freestyle loophole

Postby Genghis Khan CA on Thu Oct 25, 2007 8:42 am

JOHNNYROCKET24 wrote:understood- yeah I missed the 3 turns out of 4 in the old system


Great, I like happy endings! :D
Highest score: 562
Highest place: 16590
Highest rank: Private
User avatar
Brigadier Genghis Khan CA
 
Posts: 727
Joined: Mon Nov 13, 2006 11:19 pm

Postby oVo on Thu Oct 25, 2007 10:08 am

So another fix to the old 1v1 freestyle might have been,

round 2 - player A moves and player B doesn't

round 3 - player A can't take turn until player B goes
because he moved last in round 2
User avatar
Major oVo
 
Posts: 3864
Joined: Fri Jan 26, 2007 1:41 pm
Location: Antarctica

Postby MeDeFe on Thu Oct 25, 2007 3:57 pm

And what if B "misses" his turn again?
User avatar
Major MeDeFe
 
Posts: 7831
Joined: Thu Apr 06, 2006 2:48 am
Location: Follow the trail of holes in other people's arguments.

Postby Scott-Land on Thu Oct 25, 2007 4:40 pm

why doesnt player c get to play?
User avatar
Major Scott-Land
 
Posts: 2423
Joined: Tue Jan 23, 2007 9:37 pm

Postby Herakilla on Thu Oct 25, 2007 7:38 pm

Scott-Land wrote:why doesnt player c get to play?


AHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA when i read that i imagined a whiny little voice

the old tactic they are discussing only worked 1v1 unless all but one players in a game agreed to do it lol
Come join us in Live Chat!
User avatar
Lieutenant Herakilla
 
Posts: 4283
Joined: Fri Jun 09, 2006 8:33 pm
Location: Wandering the world, spreading Conquerism


Return to Conquer Club Discussion

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users