Get to Know Ron Paul

\\OFF-TOPIC// conversations about everything that has nothing to do with Conquer Club.

Moderator: Community Team

Forum rules
Please read the Community Guidelines before posting.
User avatar
radiojake
Posts: 678
Joined: Fri Dec 29, 2006 11:29 pm
Location: Adelaidian living in Melbourne

Post by radiojake »

Napoleon Ier wrote:
Tyr wrote:actually i was pointing out the fact that most people who preach tolerance are not very tolerant of opposing veiws

if thats what you meant then yes


Pretty much. We were illustrating the hypocricy the squealing leftist cactus smokers attitude.



Ha. But you do realise that if you weren't intolerant in the first place, then we would have nothing to argue against. (if, by leftist cactus smokers you are referring to people who have an opposing view of your own)

There is a difference between Intelligence and stupidity. While, some racist's (like yourself, Naps) can be intelligent, there's no denying that racist's are indeed stupid, or have stupid ideas.
-- share what ya got --
Tyr
Posts: 405
Joined: Tue May 29, 2007 6:13 pm
Location: Mars

Post by Tyr »

maybe napoleon is intolerant or what ever but i couldnt care less what anyone else thinks about god, politics and so on so dont lump me in there
most people who want to share their veiws with you dont want you to share yours with them
User avatar
radiojake
Posts: 678
Joined: Fri Dec 29, 2006 11:29 pm
Location: Adelaidian living in Melbourne

Post by radiojake »

Tyr wrote:maybe napoleon is intolerant or what ever but i couldnt care less what anyone else thinks about god, politics and so on so dont lump me in there


I didn't
-- share what ya got --
Tyr
Posts: 405
Joined: Tue May 29, 2007 6:13 pm
Location: Mars

Post by Tyr »

i know just warning you
most people who want to share their veiws with you dont want you to share yours with them
User avatar
heavycola
Posts: 2925
Joined: Thu Jun 01, 2006 10:22 am
Location: Maailmanvalloittajat

Post by heavycola »

Napoleon Ier wrote:
heavycola wrote:
Napoleon Ier wrote:Precisely, I do claim there are moral absolutes, i don't claim I'm their litmate dispensor, nor do I have he arrogance to pretend I believe anyone with a differening opinion is "stoopidz".


I was more interested in your thoughts on racial hierarchy. (Your absolute morality nonsense is now officially tiresome. As well as wrong.)


I dont believe in it.

The absolute morality is only tiresome because you have no answers to it.


No, it's tiresome because it's a boring argument.

As i have said now more than once, I am more interested in your thoughts on racial hierarchy. What characteristics do you use to establish this hierarchy? Who measures them? Which race is at the top? Who is at the bottom?
Image
User avatar
Snorri1234
Posts: 3438
Joined: Wed Sep 12, 2007 11:52 am
Location: Right in the middle of a fucking reptile zoo.
Contact:

Post by Snorri1234 »

Tyr wrote:actually i was pointing out the fact that most people who preach tolerance are not very tolerant of opposing veiws

if thats what you meant then yes


Ah I see. I must have missed the part where tolerance meant that I shouldn't have an opinion of other people.
"Some motherfuckers are always trying to ice skate uphill."

Duane: You know what they say about love and war.
Tim: Yes, one involves a lot of physical and psychological pain, and the other one's war.
User avatar
Napoleon Ier
Posts: 2299
Joined: Mon Jul 30, 2007 10:33 am
Location: Exploiting the third world's genetic plant resources.

Post by Napoleon Ier »

heavycola wrote:
Napoleon Ier wrote:
heavycola wrote:
Napoleon Ier wrote:Precisely, I do claim there are moral absolutes, i don't claim I'm their litmate dispensor, nor do I have he arrogance to pretend I believe anyone with a differening opinion is "stoopidz".


I was more interested in your thoughts on racial hierarchy. (Your absolute morality nonsense is now officially tiresome. As well as wrong.)


I dont believe in it.

The absolute morality is only tiresome because you have no answers to it.


No, it's tiresome because it's a boring argument.

As i have said now more than once, I am more interested in your thoughts on racial hierarchy. What characteristics do you use to establish this hierarchy? Who measures them? Which race is at the top? Who is at the bottom?


I don't believe in it.
Le Roy est mort: Vive le Roy!

Dieu et mon Pays.
User avatar
Snorri1234
Posts: 3438
Joined: Wed Sep 12, 2007 11:52 am
Location: Right in the middle of a fucking reptile zoo.
Contact:

Post by Snorri1234 »

Napoleon Ier wrote:
heavycola wrote:
Napoleon Ier wrote:
heavycola wrote:
Napoleon Ier wrote:Precisely, I do claim there are moral absolutes, i don't claim I'm their litmate dispensor, nor do I have he arrogance to pretend I believe anyone with a differening opinion is "stoopidz".


I was more interested in your thoughts on racial hierarchy. (Your absolute morality nonsense is now officially tiresome. As well as wrong.)


I dont believe in it.

The absolute morality is only tiresome because you have no answers to it.


No, it's tiresome because it's a boring argument.

As i have said now more than once, I am more interested in your thoughts on racial hierarchy. What characteristics do you use to establish this hierarchy? Who measures them? Which race is at the top? Who is at the bottom?


I don't believe in it.

But you don't believe the idea behind it is stupid?
"Some motherfuckers are always trying to ice skate uphill."

Duane: You know what they say about love and war.
Tim: Yes, one involves a lot of physical and psychological pain, and the other one's war.
User avatar
Napoleon Ier
Posts: 2299
Joined: Mon Jul 30, 2007 10:33 am
Location: Exploiting the third world's genetic plant resources.

Post by Napoleon Ier »

Snorri1234 wrote:
Napoleon Ier wrote:
heavycola wrote:
Napoleon Ier wrote:
heavycola wrote:
Napoleon Ier wrote:Precisely, I do claim there are moral absolutes, i don't claim I'm their litmate dispensor, nor do I have he arrogance to pretend I believe anyone with a differening opinion is "stoopidz".


I was more interested in your thoughts on racial hierarchy. (Your absolute morality nonsense is now officially tiresome. As well as wrong.)


I dont believe in it.

The absolute morality is only tiresome because you have no answers to it.


No, it's tiresome because it's a boring argument.

As i have said now more than once, I am more interested in your thoughts on racial hierarchy. What characteristics do you use to establish this hierarchy? Who measures them? Which race is at the top? Who is at the bottom?


I don't believe in it.

But you don't believe the idea behind it is stupid?


Not necessarily, no. However most of its proponents often are.
Le Roy est mort: Vive le Roy!

Dieu et mon Pays.
Post Reply

Return to “Acceptable Content”