Page 2 of 2

Re: nice scott

Posted: Wed Jan 06, 2016 8:14 am
by iAmCaffeine
Beast Of Burson wrote:
iAmCaffeine wrote:Thankfully it's up to the moderators, not us, so please get a clue before bothering to post.
If that's the case, why are you even putting any input into it?

You have no say, so I would suggest staying out it and letting the mods handle it.
There is discussion because for some people it seems to be a grey area. I believe this is against the rules but we will see how the moderators rule. Adding input and commenting in your manner are different.

I agree with Don, but I think that much is already obvious.

Re: nice scott

Posted: Wed Jan 06, 2016 9:33 am
by owenshooter
KraphtOne wrote:Having now taken 20 seconds to look at the game. He did not benefit from missing the turn in any way... And if you think he did then, well, you are an idiot
um... that is the point!!! these guys all think he is somehow breaking a rule, and he clearly isn't!!! thank you!!! the black jesus loves you...-Jésus noir


Re: nice scott

Posted: Wed Jan 06, 2016 9:33 pm
by king achilles
I feel like this particular report is more about his rudeness and a little about his missed turn which is suspected as intentional.

For his game chat behavior, feel free to put him on your Foe list.

As for a planned miss turn, I believe that missing a turn is not or should not be seen as a tactical advantage. Of course there may be in some circumstances but in general, no. The player taking the turn has his chance to do whatever damage he can while his opponent is not taking or missing his turn. Those deferred troops can't be used to make an assault until the following round. It is more of a risk than an advantage to miss a turn in a 1v1 game.

However, I also can't deny the annoyance that this kind of practice brings. If more and more people files a report against his suspected intentional miss turns then we'll see and cross this bridge when we get there.
Don't be intentionally annoying!

Common sense prevails - if you are intentionally or continually making this community less enjoyable for others, you're going to be removed from it. It's that simple. This applies to any part of the site where interaction takes place; in Forums, Private Messages, Live Chat and Game Chat.

Re: nice scott

Posted: Thu Jan 07, 2016 6:02 am
by iAmCaffeine
king achilles wrote:As for a planned miss turn, I believe that missing a turn is not or should not be seen as a tactical advantage. Of course there may be in some circumstances but in general, no. The player taking the turn has his chance to do whatever damage he can while his opponent is not taking or missing his turn. Those deferred troops can't be used to make an assault until the following round. It is more of a risk than an advantage to miss a turn in a 1v1 game.
In sequential games this would be correct. However, because it's freestyle, the player that misses the turn then has 12hrs to begin before his oppponent - who didn't miss a turn - can do anything.

Re: nice scott

Posted: Thu Jan 07, 2016 8:51 pm
by KraphtOne
iAmCaffeine wrote:
king achilles wrote:As for a planned miss turn, I believe that missing a turn is not or should not be seen as a tactical advantage. Of course there may be in some circumstances but in general, no. The player taking the turn has his chance to do whatever damage he can while his opponent is not taking or missing his turn. Those deferred troops can't be used to make an assault until the following round. It is more of a risk than an advantage to miss a turn in a 1v1 game.
In sequential games this would be correct. However, because it's freestyle, the player that misses the turn then has 12hrs to begin before his oppponent - who didn't miss a turn - can do anything.

I would like for you to give me one scenario outside of the very first round where this is an advantage...

I'm all for learning new and complex game theories...

I can come up with one... It is an unlikely scenario, but I would like to know what YOU think an advantage is...