Moderator: Community Team
Skittles! wrote:Read again what Tim said. 'Outlast Team Rocket'. Now, if Wing, Doom, Nark and BuJ were actually wild Pokemon they would have the same win condition as this. Because I have this (I'll be crucified for saying this but whatever) - I am a wild pokemon and word to word that is my win condition.TimWoodbury wrote:PS my win con was to live till the end and outlast team rocket... i was was testing dakky to see if he would skum slip and show he was team ocket.
As grating as your playstyle is, I feel he's onto something. unvote What bothers me is your "if you're not with us, you're against us" attitude. If you're just a third party survivor, if someone isn't with you, then they could be either town, scum, or another third party. Making some assumptions about win cons going off of the standard that are seen in most mafia games [survivor just outlasts scum, town must kill all scum and antagonistic third parties, and third parties vary] there's at least a one in three chance that if one is not with you, they aren't against you as you have no bearing on their winning or losing. If you are, in fact, a wild pokemon as things are pointing towards, you're not doing anything to help the town by creating this very polarizing list. Ontop of that, assuming that trainers are cult like in their abilities, who could they recruit? Let's look at the games, anime, and whatever other pokemon media you can find, shall we? Let's see, they can't exactly capture other trainers, and the overwhelming norm is that they can't capture pokemon from other trainers. So, going off of that, it's a simple leap of logic that the trainers in this game can only recruit pokemon that aren't belonging to other trainers. Your "non-scum" list is simply a target list for the cult leaders.kwanton wrote: He's actually not revealing townies, he's revealing survivors. Tim made the third-party faction clear when he claimed. My guess is wild pokemon are in the game for the express purpose of being XP farms for the aligned factions. They are otherwise unimportant in the mafia vs town dynamic. They won't have targets painted on them unless their actual role is revealed. Just revealing faction is fine (especially because it is a theory from a player and all players have imperfect information)
sheepofdumb wrote:I'm not scum, just a threat to the town. There's a difference, thank you very much.
ga7 wrote: I'll keep my vote where it should be but just in case Vote Strike Wolf AND f*ck FLAMINGOS f*ck THEM HARD
Are you absolutely sure of that? Cause I triple checked before making that post to make sure it said that. He paraphrased very closely to what mine looks like.kwanton wrote:Skittles! wrote:Read again what Tim said. 'Outlast Team Rocket'. Now, if Wing, Doom, Nark and BuJ were actually wild Pokemon they would have the same win condition as this. Because I have this (I'll be crucified for saying this but whatever) - I am a wild pokemon and word to word that is my win condition.TimWoodbury wrote:PS my win con was to live till the end and outlast team rocket... i was was testing dakky to see if he would skum slip and show he was team ocket.
Tim DID NOT quote his win condition "word for word". It is not worded "outlast team rocket".
Unvote vote Skittles
Wildboys u with me?
KraphtOne wrote:when you sign up a new account one of the check boxes should be "do you want to foe colton24 (it is highly recommended) "
So the case on wing is partly based on this quote?WingCmdr Ginkapo wrote:
Indeed as I have said to Legionairre, there is limited incentive for me to scumhunt strongly. So dont sit about waiting for me to do so.
If you guys stop asking me for information, I will stop with the sarcastic posting. Its very simple.
It is not "word for word" as you originally said. I'm sure others can back me up on this. Word for word means exactly the same, not a paraphrase.Skittles! wrote:Are you absolutely sure of that? Cause I triple checked before making that post to make sure it said that. He paraphrased very closely to what mine looks like.kwanton wrote:Skittles! wrote:Read again what Tim said. 'Outlast Team Rocket'. Now, if Wing, Doom, Nark and BuJ were actually wild Pokemon they would have the same win condition as this. Because I have this (I'll be crucified for saying this but whatever) - I am a wild pokemon and word to word that is my win condition.TimWoodbury wrote:PS my win con was to live till the end and outlast team rocket... i was was testing dakky to see if he would skum slip and show he was team ocket.
Tim DID NOT quote his win condition "word for word". It is not worded "outlast team rocket".
Unvote vote Skittles
Wildboys u with me?
Yeah, I fucked up. It says Team Rocket doesn't win, not outlast. My excuse is that I was at work when I posted this and I had tried to think how best to make my argument but I didn't proof read. That's my reasoning, you don't have to believe it though. I don't think it takes away my point about it being suspicious that Wing isn't trying to look for scum, because even if the wording that I said that it was wasn't true, even with your claim it says team rocket doesn't win, which essentially is outlasting them.kwanton wrote:It is not "word for word" as you originally said. I'm sure others can back me up on this. Word for word means exactly the same, not a paraphrase.Skittles! wrote:Are you absolutely sure of that? Cause I triple checked before making that post to make sure it said that. He paraphrased very closely to what mine looks like.kwanton wrote:Skittles! wrote:Read again what Tim said. 'Outlast Team Rocket'. Now, if Wing, Doom, Nark and BuJ were actually wild Pokemon they would have the same win condition as this. Because I have this (I'll be crucified for saying this but whatever) - I am a wild pokemon and word to word that is my win condition.TimWoodbury wrote:PS my win con was to live till the end and outlast team rocket... i was was testing dakky to see if he would skum slip and show he was team ocket.
Tim DID NOT quote his win condition "word for word". It is not worded "outlast team rocket".
Unvote vote Skittles
Wildboys u with me?
Changing your phrasing now to "paraphrased very closely" seems like backtracking. Normally I wouldn't jump on something as seemingly minor as phrasing, but I think you're experienced enough to know to be very careful with wording in a mafia game. I don't think you'd have said word for word unless you meant word for word.
KraphtOne wrote:when you sign up a new account one of the check boxes should be "do you want to foe colton24 (it is highly recommended) "
I can confirm this. The rest of what Skittles wrote matched up with what I know to be true and with what Tim claimed. It seems to me that there are a shit ton of 3rd party players. Can wild pokemon be claimed? Are there any pokemon that are starting out as "town"? We know there are trainers, the question now being if any of them are town, or if they are all scum. I understand why claiming a trainer is suicidal, and I know there are others who will understand what I mean by that. And if you understand, this also explains why I didn't feel it absolutely necessary to lynch a trainer Day 1.Skittles! wrote:Yeah, I fucked up. It says Team Rocket doesn't win, not outlast. My excuse is that I was at work when I posted this and I had tried to think how best to make my argument but I didn't proof read. That's my reasoning, you don't have to believe it though. I don't think it takes away my point about it being suspicious that Wing isn't trying to look for scum, because even if the wording that I said that it was wasn't true, even with your claim it says team rocket doesn't win, which essentially is outlasting them.kwanton wrote:It is not "word for word" as you originally said. I'm sure others can back me up on this. Word for word means exactly the same, not a paraphrase.Skittles! wrote:Are you absolutely sure of that? Cause I triple checked before making that post to make sure it said that. He paraphrased very closely to what mine looks like.kwanton wrote:Skittles! wrote:Read again what Tim said. 'Outlast Team Rocket'. Now, if Wing, Doom, Nark and BuJ were actually wild Pokemon they would have the same win condition as this. Because I have this (I'll be crucified for saying this but whatever) - I am a wild pokemon and word to word that is my win condition.TimWoodbury wrote:PS my win con was to live till the end and outlast team rocket... i was was testing dakky to see if he would skum slip and show he was team ocket.
Tim DID NOT quote his win condition "word for word". It is not worded "outlast team rocket".
Unvote vote Skittles
Wildboys u with me?
Changing your phrasing now to "paraphrased very closely" seems like backtracking. Normally I wouldn't jump on something as seemingly minor as phrasing, but I think you're experienced enough to know to be very careful with wording in a mafia game. I don't think you'd have said word for word unless you meant word for word.
But yes I screwed up royally there.
This is where you need to learn subtlety. It wasn't necessary for you to point out the color - those who know, know.TimWoodbury wrote:kwan i was just bout to unvote and vote till his last post only those who got that message would know the exact color to use
saxitoxin wrote:Serbia is a RUDE DUDE
may not be a PRUDE, but he's gotta 'TUDE
might not be LEWD, but he's gonna get BOOED
RUDE
I had started to make a post voting him also an hour ago... got distracted, came back, and had to delete it all lol. In any case, I will Unvote kwanton, now that he is participating and seemingly town.TimWoodbury wrote:kwan i was just bout to unvote and vote till his last post only those who got that message would know the exact color to use
madmitch wrote:Wing you said Anark ,Doom and Bujaber are not scumwith you that is 4 ,How many are there usually on Team Rocket
![]()
madmitch wrote:First Welcome Aage, I usually trust Wings judgement so vote TWO
You seem to be rolling with the "either you're third party survivor or you're scum" rather smoothly...And as with any game I've been in, whatever my alignment is makes no difference to my being clueless. You should know this, by now.Fircoal wrote: As for TWO, I'm not sure if he's clueless scum or if he just missed the important peice. While I certainly FOS him, my vote is still on Serbia for now. I would like to see him respond though.
I misunderstood your post, was all. Your phrasing came off as asking if we wanted your opinions, not as asking our thoughts on your opinions. Thank you for clarifying. I interpreted it as you having additional thoughts that you were withholding until someone said that they were interested. I was a wee bit overly antagonistic, there, to be fair...Ragian wrote:You aren't reading the bloody thread, mate. But no sweats. I'll repeat what I've said twice now: My thoughts on Marashu ARE put out there. I did so before asking [if] anyone cares for them. It was not a question asking if anyone would care if I posted my thoughts on Marashu. I already had and was asking if anyone cared for them. I understand the confusion, but it had already been cleared up. Half of my thoughts correspond to your own thoughts.The Weird One wrote:Please, for the love of all that may or may not be holy, don't ask this question....just give us your thoughts. If we didn't want one player's thoughts on another player, why would we be reading the bloody thread?Ragian wrote:Anyoen care for my thoughts on Marashu?
sheepofdumb wrote:I'm not scum, just a threat to the town. There's a difference, thank you very much.
ga7 wrote: I'll keep my vote where it should be but just in case Vote Strike Wolf AND f*ck FLAMINGOS f*ck THEM HARD
The Weird One wrote:Ontop of that, assuming that trainers are cult like in their abilities, who could they recruit? Let's look at the games, anime, and whatever other pokemon media you can find, shall we? Let's see, they can't exactly capture other trainers, and the overwhelming norm is that they can't capture pokemon from other trainers. So, going off of that, it's a simple leap of logic that the trainers in this game can only recruit pokemon that aren't belonging to other trainers. Your "non-scum" list is simply a target list for the cult leaders.
It's funny you should say that. As a trainer (apparently) I'm planning to catch all those who voted for me as such and force them to fight for their new trainer. Now that's dramatic irony.kwanton wrote:That's actually a really good point. We don't know for sure that trainers are recruiters, but it would make a lot of sense. Don't put me on no lists. I don't want to have to battle for some trainer.The Weird One wrote:Ontop of that, assuming that trainers are cult like in their abilities, who could they recruit? Let's look at the games, anime, and whatever other pokemon media you can find, shall we? Let's see, they can't exactly capture other trainers, and the overwhelming norm is that they can't capture pokemon from other trainers. So, going off of that, it's a simple leap of logic that the trainers in this game can only recruit pokemon that aren't belonging to other trainers. Your "non-scum" list is simply a target list for the cult leaders.

Mandy said he does not particularly care about quoting roles. It's in the first post.Metsfanmax wrote:Can we get a mod statement on whether any of these people quoting details from their role PMs will be punished in any way?
Metsfanmax wrote:Can we get a mod statement on whether any of these people quoting details from their role PMs will be punished in any way?
Stop skimming.mandalorian2298 wrote:While you are absolutely right about role quoting being usually being against Mafia etiquette, I explicitly allow it in the rules (just as I have in NJO).nagerous wrote: Please do not quote role PMs or win conditions even in paraphrasing format.
It is a massive no-no and can get you blacklisted from future games
I do this because I'm frankly to lazy to investigate every post searching for possible quotes. Also, given how long roles were in this game, randomizing the wording in each one would have been a chore. Finally, in the olden days of NJO, many people (myself included) were obsessed with the attempting to play the Mod and not the game, so when I modded I did my best to anticipate all the ways in which I would try to exploit the game mechanics if I were a player.
To summerize: I made sure that quoting posts is a) useless in terms of it being a winning strategy and b) suicidal if it reveals your role. Anyone who want's to test the quality of my work is welcome to try.
saxitoxin wrote:Serbia is a RUDE DUDE
may not be a PRUDE, but he's gotta 'TUDE
might not be LEWD, but he's gonna get BOOED
RUDE