929, thanks for sponsoring this.

Aye

exactly "he lives." and his victim does not.

Killing him isn't going to do anything but add another death to the statistic list.

does nothing? doesn't make another guy go "hmm I don't want to die maybe I shouldn't kill what's his face?"
last time I checked that's not fair or natural.

Fair ...

I'm against the death penalty, simply because it is not Man's place to judge who lives, who dies, and when.


Like, say, an axe wielding maniac?

It is not his role to kill anyone and not ours to kill him.

and yet what if he does kill someone? what if he kills more than one someones? are we ...

and yet what if he does kill someone? what if he kills more than one someones? are we just supposed to wait and let God kill him? (BTW I do believe in God, being a born again christian) well we're waiting what if he starts killing more people? 2 a day? 4 a day? do we just keep waiting?



ok your ...

You have roughly 2 million people in jail in the United States. Sure no one wants in an ideal world to kill someone, but practically that's an option which is entirely viable. Clear out the prisons. Why should we pay for these bastards to live and thrive, spreading their criminal influence. Before ...

I'm against the death penalty, simply because it is not Man's place to judge who lives, who dies, and when.


Like, say, an axe wielding maniac?

It is not his role to kill anyone and not ours to kill him.

and yet what if he does kill someone? what if he kills more than one someones? are we ...

same as above ^

Sounds neat I'm in.
Extream Global Warming please.

good idea


"they should simply not get a piece of the cake if they were not there to cook it."

lol

I think it's a good idea but I don't see it happening.

If the cardboard Posters get made then You should make card decks with the countries to

do you have to be a girl to join?

I think as long as someone else can figure it out from game log then it's is fine. although you might get a neg. But I agree that it should be legal, as in remove negs given for that reason

QFT?

Yep.



When you reach 5 cards you have to turn them in. If as a result of eliminating someone you have more than 5 cards you can turn them in mid-turn.

How about for bonus's instead of armies you get a card?

Possibly in stead of +1 die (by that you mean roll another dice?) you could do it like in LotR Risk and add one numebr to the highest die. so if you rolled a 2,3,5, against a 3,5 instead of losing 2 armies the bonus would make the 5 a 6 for that roll. same for defense.
also maybe one race could ...

Thanks guys the specifics are actually some middle earth map. but I'll apply this to all my games

-----------------------------

@ + + + $

------------------------------

ok if I'm defending $ against @ with three territs in between, and 8 armies total (so one on each spot and 4 extra.) is it better to defend with 2 on each territ or 5 on one space and 1 on the others?

How about instead of concede, it's a surrender button. that way the other, still alive, players have the option to decline the surrender and play it out?

You're not the only one, like I said, so no worries and I think yours is the more understandable of the two mistakes mibi has to fix. Some people were thinking the red numbers to label the territories were the red player so we have to fix that too.

Some people are idiots to what's your point?

oh dang so I'm holding a worthless area!

poop!

oh well I guess I'll go take a beach then thanks coleman. I assumed the inner/outer ran up and down not across.

Ok on the D-Day map first can some explain which beaches are the inner and outer? same with the inner and outer ships please?

I had 21st panzers 1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8, the 21st german artillery 1,2,3 and the 21st bunker 1 & 2.

I got the +2 bonus for the artillery and the bunker but not for holding ...