Look, you can twist and manipulate this however you want, I'm tired of arguing with you and I've already told you that while your opinion is appreciated, I'm looking for less potentially biased opinions.

Just the fact that you're still calling my accusation "baseless" shows how biased you are ...

It is fairly obvious to me that you were more than likely born in 1988 due to your name...

And you are gonna accuse a 60 year old man who is a well-known and established player here???

You're an idiot.

It is fairly obvious to me that someone whose vocabulary comprises words like, "gonna" and ...

Granted, you've played more games than I, and I appreciate your feedback, but I'd like to wait for another opinion on this. After all, one of them is your dad, so I'm not sure whether your opinion is entirely impartial.

I don't think my accusation was a stretch.

First, you're exaggerating ...

Update:

Thomas J finally spoke. He referred to him and aqua as "we" and seemed to imply that their not attacking each other and leaving their borders (and continent bonuses) unprotected was their "strategy."

Of course, I'm not against alliances and diplomacy. But, like I said before, they ...

These are suspected Multis or Secret Alliance:

Suspect users: Thomas J. and dumbodo

Game number: http://www.conquerclub.com/game.php?game=458245 (458245)

Comments:

Fairly open and shut case here. Undefended borders (with continent bonuses at stake!) against each other ...

When will someone get a chance to look at this? Check out what happened in the most recent round. We're not even the strongest team and the game has turned into a 4v2 against us, WITHOUT anything being declared publicly by the other teams. And check out all the undefended borders/bonuses they have ...

I really dont know what you want done here. People should stop confusing secret alliances with mutually benificial pacts.

I am currently in a game where I control North and South america. A player controls africa with large army counts in Europe (although not owned) and the 3rd player of our game ...

Suspected Users: Teams 2 & 3
Possible secret alliance, please investigate
Game URL: m

Comments:

Teams 2 and 3 haven't attacked each other and have been attacking only my partner and me (team 1) for the past several turns (except the occasional attacks on singles that they did against each ...

After having reviewed this, I, for one, will be putting Gary30060 on my ignore list.

Edit:

I didnt say it was a secret alliance....just very unfair.........and might as well be cheating when one player has no chance of winning......

Liar? Or just a very bad memory. Check the chat logs ...

Well, I don't want to discourage people from reporting seemingly suspicious behaviour, as I believe that this is necessary to make the game more enjoyable and to improve the game in the long run.

My main grievances, as I previously mentioned, were the lack of research done (or simply poor ...

I'll fill it out for him, just to get this moving along. tke_29's abusive use of the feedback system has deterred other players from playing with Sameer and me (we started a new game some time ago and no one has joined), and the sooner we're cleared and those feedback comments are removed, the ...

Honestly, just think about what you're suggesting -- if we were multis (or rather, if I owned both of these accounts), then we'd be playing standard games together and making secret alliances rather than playing in doubles games, where the two players are supposed to work together.

As for the ...