Treating the Pill as Abortion.

\\OFF-TOPIC// conversations about everything that has nothing to do with Conquer Club.

Moderator: Community Team

Forum rules
Please read the Community Guidelines before posting.
User avatar
MeDeFe
Posts: 7831
Joined: Thu Apr 06, 2006 2:48 am
Location: Follow the trail of holes in other people's arguments.

Re: Treating the Pill as Abortion.

Post by MeDeFe »

PopeBenXVI wrote:Black, you confuse murder with killing...they are not the same. The correct translation of the commandment is "shall not Murder" The Church (Catholic Church) has always taught you not only can.... but have an obligation to protect the innocent whether your talking about the military or protecting your family.

You know, the difference between "murdering" and "killing" is one of legality, one is legal, the other is not.

I also corrected your typos.
Your friendly neighbourhood S&G Nazi.
saxitoxin wrote:Your position is more complex than the federal tax code. As soon as I think I understand it, I find another index of cross-references, exceptions and amendments I have to apply.
Timminz wrote:Yo mama is so classless, she could be a Marxist utopia.
User avatar
jonesthecurl
Posts: 4619
Joined: Sun Mar 16, 2008 9:42 am
Gender: Male
Location: disused action figure warehouse
Contact:

Re: Treating the Pill as Abortion.

Post by jonesthecurl »

black elk speaks wrote:
jonesthecurl wrote:Please:
the question of whether abortion is right or wrong, and the circumstances under which it is right if it can ever be right has been bludgeoned to death in the thread on abortion. Revive that topic if you feel the need to say over agina that which has been said before several times and by a number of people.

It seems to me that this thread is about the question of whether "the pill" is abortion (When it has not previously been considered to be so). And who gets to make that definition.

If we can get back to that (or those) topics, I'll join in - but at the moment I'm just getting a powerful sense of deja vu. And if you want my views on the topic of abortion (or those of a number of CC posters) they are laid out clearly there.


you have to determine when the fertilized egg is considered a person. when does pregnancy actually begin.



Yes. that is what the thread is about (as well as about who gets to make that definition).
My point was that it was wandering off into abortion is right/wrong, which has been thrashed out over many many pages before.
instagram.com/garethjohnjoneswrites
User avatar
black elk speaks
Posts: 133
Joined: Thu Aug 14, 2008 6:48 pm

Re: Treating the Pill as Abortion.

Post by black elk speaks »

jonesthecurl wrote:
black elk speaks wrote:
jonesthecurl wrote:Please:
the question of whether abortion is right or wrong, and the circumstances under which it is right if it can ever be right has been bludgeoned to death in the thread on abortion. Revive that topic if you feel the need to say over agina that which has been said before several times and by a number of people.

It seems to me that this thread is about the question of whether "the pill" is abortion (When it has not previously been considered to be so). And who gets to make that definition.

If we can get back to that (or those) topics, I'll join in - but at the moment I'm just getting a powerful sense of deja vu. And if you want my views on the topic of abortion (or those of a number of CC posters) they are laid out clearly there.


you have to determine when the fertilized egg is considered a person. when does pregnancy actually begin.



Yes. that is what the thread is about (as well as about who gets to make that definition).
My point was that it was wandering off into abortion is right/wrong, which has been thrashed out over many many pages before.


yes, you already said that, we veered off again and corrected. thank you for your due diligence.
Post Reply

Return to “Acceptable Content”