Ranks?!?!?!?!!!?!

Suggestions that have been archived.

Moderator: Community Team

Do we need a new rank?

Yes
57
83%
No
12
17%
 
Total votes: 69

Ronaldinho
Posts: 3069
Joined: Sat May 27, 2006 5:35 pm
Gender: Male
Location: Dorset, England.

Ranks?!?!?!?!!!?!

Post by Ronaldinho »

Ive just had a look at the scoreboard and 81 was the colonal pos. This is STUPID and i think that lack should stick another rank to split it up a little :).


what i propose is that you shift colonal upto 2400 (or higher) and you put a new rank at 2000, this could be Lieutenant Colonel. I have been looking on wiki and ive got a picture for this aswel. Its sort of a leaf idea and looks quite nice after a little tinkering.


Image



Well im sure people can adjust and improve this idea. But i think its vital that we get a new rank in there somewhere.



thanks.


Ronaldinho
Image
User avatar
Sargentgeneral
Posts: 379
Joined: Thu Nov 16, 2006 11:55 pm
Location: On Conquerclub, duh!

Post by Sargentgeneral »

I like the idea and agree there should be a new one, but not Lieutenant Colonel. Maybe shift things around and add a Corpral or something new like that.
Highest score: 1910
Highest rank: 188

Battle of the bands #1 champion: ACDC
User avatar
AK_iceman
Posts: 5704
Joined: Wed May 10, 2006 10:39 pm

Post by AK_iceman »

Something is already in the works. PM Sully800 for details. :)
Ronaldinho
Posts: 3069
Joined: Sat May 27, 2006 5:35 pm
Gender: Male
Location: Dorset, England.

Post by Ronaldinho »

Sargentgeneral wrote:I like the idea and agree there should be a new one, but not Lieutenant Colonel. Maybe shift things around and add a Corpral or something new like that.



Its was the next lowest American rank from colonel :D
Image
User avatar
reverend_kyle
Posts: 9250
Joined: Tue Mar 21, 2006 4:08 pm
Location: 1000 post club
Contact:

Post by reverend_kyle »

Lieutenant colonel is a high lieutenant, not a low colonel.
DANCING MUSTARD FOR POOP IN '08!
Ronaldinho
Posts: 3069
Joined: Sat May 27, 2006 5:35 pm
Gender: Male
Location: Dorset, England.

Post by Ronaldinho »

reverend_kyle wrote:Lieutenant colonel is a high lieutenant, not a low colonel.



dont be differcult :lol: i aint great on american ranks lol.
Image
User avatar
reverend_kyle
Posts: 9250
Joined: Tue Mar 21, 2006 4:08 pm
Location: 1000 post club
Contact:

Post by reverend_kyle »

Ronaldinho wrote:
reverend_kyle wrote:Lieutenant colonel is a high lieutenant, not a low colonel.



dont be differcult :lol: i aint great on american ranks lol.


Neither am I, thats just what my military history teacher told me.. I could be wrong.. anyways, I think we shoudl go with ranks from the game stratego, as that is militarily accurate.
DANCING MUSTARD FOR POOP IN '08!
User avatar
AK_iceman
Posts: 5704
Joined: Wed May 10, 2006 10:39 pm

Post by AK_iceman »

reverend_kyle wrote:anyways, I think we shoudl go with ranks from the game stratego, as that is militarily accurate.

And what about the spy rank?

Edit: And Miner isn't really a military rank either. :?
User avatar
reverend_kyle
Posts: 9250
Joined: Tue Mar 21, 2006 4:08 pm
Location: 1000 post club
Contact:

Post by reverend_kyle »

AK_iceman wrote:
reverend_kyle wrote:anyways, I think we shoudl go with ranks from the game stratego, as that is militarily accurate.

And what about the spy rank?

Edit: And Miner isn't really a military rank either. :?


Spy and miner are two that i'd leave out, but corporal and private could replace those as I dont believe that those are on stratego.
DANCING MUSTARD FOR POOP IN '08!
User avatar
w3a2
Posts: 102
Joined: Tue Aug 29, 2006 1:12 am
Location: internet

Post by w3a2 »

hardly going to affect me, as stuck on Sargeant i am forever
User avatar
lackattack
Posts: 6097
Joined: Sun Jan 01, 2006 10:34 pm
Location: Montreal, QC

Post by lackattack »

This is a recent breakdown of ranks

New Recruit -> 28326
Private -------> 7194
Sergeant ----> 2233
Lieutenant ---> 860
Captain ------> 386
Major ---------> 265
Colonel --------> 75
General ---------> 4


Where do you see a problem?
User avatar
johnnyrotten
Posts: 2883
Joined: Sat Mar 04, 2006 4:42 pm
Gender: Male
Location: Poole, England

Post by johnnyrotten »

Too many [shudder] New Recruits [/shudder] :lol:
Last edited by johnnyrotten on Wed Dec 27, 2006 11:38 am, edited 1 time in total.
User avatar
A Mans Part
Posts: 184
Joined: Fri Jul 14, 2006 12:20 pm
Location: Kamchatka

Post by A Mans Part »

lackattack wrote:This is a recent breakdown of ranks

New Recruit -> 28326
Private -------> 7194
Sergeant ----> 2233
Lieutenant ---> 860
Captain ------> 386
Major ---------> 265
Colonel --------> 75
General ---------> 4


Where do you see a problem?


not enough spies?
Image
User avatar
MeDeFe
Posts: 7831
Joined: Thu Apr 06, 2006 2:48 am
Location: Follow the trail of holes in other people's arguments.

Post by MeDeFe »

Speaking of ranks, we have 6(!) generals atm, make it 4000 points again!
User avatar
Boxcutta
Posts: 262
Joined: Wed Mar 22, 2006 1:14 pm
Location: Channel 7

Post by Boxcutta »

28326 new recruits and they all sign up to deadbeat in my games.
ImageImageImage
User avatar
A Mans Part
Posts: 184
Joined: Fri Jul 14, 2006 12:20 pm
Location: Kamchatka

Post by A Mans Part »

MeDeFe wrote:Speaking of ranks, we have 6(!) generals atm, make it 4000 points again!


yes, because zero is a much better number in proportion to the total number of users :infinite eyeroll:
Image
AAFitz
Posts: 7270
Joined: Sun Sep 17, 2006 9:47 am
Gender: Male
Location: On top of the World 2.1

Post by AAFitz »

there is only 4 after a year, maybe 25 or so next year...i think what will need to be done is make two star...three star and four star...

you cant crush the poor bstard that gets his bullseye...and then make him wear a hat...it just isnt right....
User avatar
spiesr
Posts: 2809
Joined: Mon May 08, 2006 10:52 am
Location: South Dakota

Post by spiesr »

A Mans Part wrote:not enough spies?


you talking about me...?
User avatar
zarvinny
Posts: 249
Joined: Mon May 15, 2006 7:56 pm
Location: Kamchatka
Contact:

Post by zarvinny »

lackattack wrote:This is a recent breakdown of ranks

New Recruit -> 28326
Private -------> 7194
Sergeant ----> 2233
Lieutenant ---> 860
Captain ------> 386
Major ---------> 265
Colonel --------> 75
General ---------> 4


Where do you see a problem?


Don't ppl disappear if they don't take a turn in 30 days? Basically, are these the numbers of all the people to ever have made an account on conquerclub or are they the folks that have played in the last 30 days? In my opinion, the amount of new recruits actually playing risk on this website at least some of the time is substantially less than 28k
User avatar
Scorba
Posts: 396
Joined: Fri Mar 24, 2006 6:14 am
Location: Upon a pale horse

Title

Post by Scorba »

Given that there are only 7821 players on the scoreboard, I'd imagine that those are the total numbers of accounts on the site.
Taking an enemy on the battlefield is like a hawk taking a bird. Though it enters into the midst of a thousand of them, it pays no attention to any bird other than the one it has first marked.
User avatar
sully800
Posts: 4978
Joined: Wed Jun 14, 2006 5:45 pm
Gender: Male
Location: Bethlehem, Pennsylvania

Post by sully800 »

Okay, as AK said, I've been working on some new rank ideas for a while now. Originally, the ones I proposed were closely based on the American military ranks. So I changed the insignia for captain, major and colonel to the American insignia. This was mostly because I didn't see the British insignia where lack found to original diamond/swords/crown.

Image

One big change is the silver vs. gold icons. The silver would denote free members and the gold would be for premium members. This distinction was something lack said he wanted in one of the other threads.

Also you will notice I added a rank of 'scout' for anyone below 800 which I think is an important distinction that we don't currently have for lowerl level players. Andy suggested we change the name for that rank to 'cadet' which I prefer as well (I just didn't redo the image). I also added the 'corporal' rank in its proper place which shifts everything above that one level so the point levels are not the same. Then at the top the ranks of brigadier, field marshall and wardlord were added. These eliminated the 1000 point jump to the highest rank, increased the ranks up to the 4000 point level and added a rank for first place so even the people at the top will have something to strive for if they are already over 4000.


Then I made a few small changes because I think the new icons for major and colonel were a little confusing, and it doesn't matter if the insignia accurately matches the military rank. In the below image I changed the icons so you would go from 1 up to 3 horizontal bars, and then straight into the stars for the upper ranks. I think this system is much less confusing because there aren't as many symbols to remember and the order of the ranks is easy to see and understand. However I also like the current swords/diamond for the major/captain ranks so another idea is to use everything in this image but keep the current icons for those two ranks.

Image

So let's have some discussion about the new images, the new point levels, and anything else involved. If there are any other changes or ideas out there I would like to hear them. Just remember these are not the finalized rank changes or anything like that, so don't just complain about how much you hate them....talk about how to improve them!
User avatar
MOBAJOBG
Posts: 748
Joined: Thu Dec 14, 2006 12:18 am

Post by MOBAJOBG »

Just for your info., there is also a 5-star General rank = Commander-in-Chief.
User avatar
hulmey
Posts: 3742
Joined: Fri Nov 03, 2006 7:33 am
Location: Las Vegas

Post by hulmey »

cant we stick to british military structure. We all know they are best trained and battle hardened troops around... And we never lost a war :)
[img]http://img801.imageshack.us/img801/9761/41922610151374166770386.jpg[/mg]
User avatar
sully800
Posts: 4978
Joined: Wed Jun 14, 2006 5:45 pm
Gender: Male
Location: Bethlehem, Pennsylvania

Post by sully800 »

The British and American ranks are the same, they just have different insignia.

And if the British never lost a war the Americans wouldn't have their own ranks, now would they? :P
User avatar
hulmey
Posts: 3742
Joined: Fri Nov 03, 2006 7:33 am
Location: Las Vegas

Post by hulmey »

this is the ranking structure for the british army:

Officer Ranks

Field Marshal General
Lieutenant General
Major General
Brigadier (General)
Colonel
Lieutenant Colonel
Major
Captain
Lieutenant
Sub Lieut. / Second Lieut. / Ensign / Cornet



Non-Commissioned and Other Ranks

Warrant Officer First Class /Sgt.Major Warrant Officer Second Class
Staff Sergeant / Colour Sergeant
Sergeant
Corporal
Lance Corporal
Private / Trooper
Last edited by hulmey on Fri Dec 29, 2006 4:04 pm, edited 1 time in total.
[img]http://img801.imageshack.us/img801/9761/41922610151374166770386.jpg[/mg]
Post Reply

Return to “Archived Suggestions”