Ratings "Tags"

[BoBiNaC]

I think the ratings "tags" is lacking in its full potential & compliment. Firstly it is very meekly derived at with regards it's options for selection. While there are plenty of negatives, what is offered for positives, I often find incapable of my intentions. Or none of your "tags" really fit descriptively my opponent. Why not or how difficult is it to ammend & expand the available tags list? Adding more personifying words, such as: deadly, methodical, tactician, devisive, ambusher,complacent, honorable, surprising. Even more evolving would be to add in personifiers which would become part of their profile. Say once a certain # of the same one was given, until overtaken, standing out somewhere noticable. words like: warrior, knight, peasant, scoundrel, rogue, mage, herder, berserker, assassin, baron/ess, bard, etc. Kind of having your enemies determine your characters disposition based on its accounts. So that maybe I would be BoBiNaC a scoundrel, be fun sort of confronted by your actions with the scarlet letter for some & entitlement for others. anyway if you'd at the least just expand the list i wouldn't find myself so frustrated from lack of availability of an appropriate "tag". thx

[redhawk92]

we need a bitch tag

[pendelfin]

I definatly think we should have a tag for players who are abusive - either personally or by using unecessary strong swear words

[cicero]

I definatly think we should have a tag for players who are abusive - either personally or by using unecessary strong swear words

We have "rude".