Fortification dropdowns (merged) [Done]

Suggestions that have been archived.

Moderator: Community Team

User avatar
Natewolfman
Posts: 4599
Joined: Wed Aug 29, 2007 6:37 pm
Gender: Male
Location: omaha, NE

Re: Fortification dropdowns (merged) [Done]

Post by Natewolfman »

going to take some getting used to! but a great one, thanks lack/guys who suggested it :)
User avatar
R0k0v
Posts: 212
Joined: Tue Jan 22, 2008 7:24 am
Location: Tea...

Re: Fortification dropdowns (merged) [Done]

Post by R0k0v »

army count box was better on the left
High Score: 2086
User avatar
owenshooter
Posts: 13294
Joined: Wed Mar 07, 2007 6:01 pm
Gender: Male
Location: Deep in the Heart of Tx

Re: Fortification dropdowns (merged) [Done]

Post by owenshooter »

R0k0v wrote:army count box was better on the left

agree, don't really like this change. it is counter intuitive... sigh... the black jesus is disappointed...-0

p.s.-but thanks for the update lack. if you think it is for the best, i am sure i shall see the light... eventually...
Image
Thorthoth,"Cloaking one's C&A fetish with moral authority and righteous indignation
makes it ever so much more erotically thrilling"
User avatar
InkL0sed
Posts: 2370
Joined: Sat Jun 23, 2007 4:06 pm
Gender: Male
Location: underwater
Contact:

Re: Fortification dropdowns (merged) [Done]

Post by InkL0sed »

I don't see why the army box had to move to the right? Seems kind of pointless to me.

Otherwise though, a good update.
User avatar
Kotaro
Posts: 3467
Joined: Sat Mar 03, 2007 2:31 pm
Location: TheJonah: You`re a fucking ruthless, little cunt!

Re: Fortification dropdowns (merged) [Done]

Post by Kotaro »

InkL0sed wrote:I don't see why the army box had to move to the right? Seems kind of pointless to me.

Otherwise though, a good update.


Agreed completely
Lakad Matataaag!
Normalin, normalin.

Image

TheJonah wrote:I`m not really that arsed. Just supporting my mucker.
potiusmori
Posts: 15
Joined: Thu Jan 25, 2007 11:38 pm

Re: tweak to the fortification dropdowns [Done]

Post by potiusmori »

lackattack wrote:Good suggestion potiusmori, benjikat and Androidz. It is now live :)

Also made it default to max # of armies, as suggested here: Fort All Armies, not One

This should cut down on the number of clicks and associated cases of carpal tunnel syndrome.

Long live reinforcements!


oholycrap. i had forgotten i had even mentioned it... loving it though. thanks lack
User avatar
owenshooter
Posts: 13294
Joined: Wed Mar 07, 2007 6:01 pm
Gender: Male
Location: Deep in the Heart of Tx

Re: Fortification dropdowns (merged) [Done]

Post by owenshooter »

InkL0sed wrote:I don't see why the army box had to move to the right? Seems kind of pointless to me. Otherwise though, a good update.

yes, can we please rethink that one aspect of it? it is confusing and counter intuitive... otherwise, a great change in gameplay... the black jesus has spoken...-0
Image
Thorthoth,"Cloaking one's C&A fetish with moral authority and righteous indignation
makes it ever so much more erotically thrilling"
User avatar
sully800
Posts: 4978
Joined: Wed Jun 14, 2006 5:45 pm
Gender: Male
Location: Bethlehem, Pennsylvania

Re: Fortification dropdowns (merged) [Done]

Post by sully800 »

owenshooter wrote:
InkL0sed wrote:I don't see why the army box had to move to the right? Seems kind of pointless to me. Otherwise though, a good update.

yes, can we please rethink that one aspect of it? it is confusing and counter intuitive... otherwise, a great change in gameplay... the black jesus has spoken...-0


It moved to the right, because the country you are fortifying from determines the number of armies that can be fortified, not the other way around.

It's counter intuitive because you are used to reading it as a sentence. Fortify X from Y to Z. Now you're still probably thinking that but the sentence has changed to Fortify from Y to Z, X armies. It may not be as neat, but its actually more logical to determine the from country first, then the to country, then the number

Give it a week or two and I imagine we'll all be used to it.
User avatar
magpies
Posts: 19
Joined: Wed Sep 19, 2007 7:23 am
Gender: Male
Location: AUSTRALIA
Contact:

Re: Fortification dropdowns (merged) [Done]

Post by magpies »

Good job guys,great improvment> =D>
User avatar
Androidz
Posts: 1046
Joined: Mon Dec 03, 2007 11:03 am

Re: Fortification dropdowns (merged) [Done]

Post by Androidz »

O.o, one of my suggestions actully came trough, even tough i wasen't first one to suggest it :lol:.

Anyway great update:)
Image
User avatar
owenshooter
Posts: 13294
Joined: Wed Mar 07, 2007 6:01 pm
Gender: Male
Location: Deep in the Heart of Tx

Re: Fortification dropdowns (merged) [Done]

Post by owenshooter »

sully800 wrote:
owenshooter wrote:
InkL0sed wrote:I don't see why the army box had to move to the right? Seems kind of pointless to me. Otherwise though, a good update.

yes, can we please rethink that one aspect of it? it is confusing and counter intuitive... otherwise, a great change in gameplay... the black jesus has spoken...-0


It moved to the right, because the country you are fortifying from determines the number of armies that can be fortified, not the other way around.

It's counter intuitive because you are used to reading it as a sentence. Fortify X from Y to Z. Now you're still probably thinking that but the sentence has changed to Fortify from Y to Z, X armies. It may not be as neat, but its actually more logical to determine the from country first, then the to country, then the number

Give it a week or two and I imagine we'll all be used to it.


sully, are you looking at the same thing i'm looking at on my games? i'm sorry but it makes far more sense to say, move x number of armies from Y to Z, than to say move Y to Z, x number of armies... if i look at a stack of apples that i want to move to a box. i am going to say, "move 3 apples from the stack, to the box. i'm not going to say, move apples to the box, 3 of them... maybe i'm not smart enough to understand what you are saying, but i am smart enough to know that it is counter intuitive... the black jesus has spoken...-0
Image
Thorthoth,"Cloaking one's C&A fetish with moral authority and righteous indignation
makes it ever so much more erotically thrilling"
User avatar
Johnny Crow
Posts: 9
Joined: Tue Dec 04, 2007 10:34 am
Location: Dallas, Texas

Re: Fortification dropdowns (merged) [Done]

Post by Johnny Crow »

If it's not broke...don't fix it.
User avatar
Rainman23
Posts: 102
Joined: Mon Jul 09, 2007 3:17 pm
Contact:

Re: Fortification dropdowns (merged) [Done]

Post by Rainman23 »

I like the old way better I think they should switch back from left to right!
User avatar
Thezzaruz
Posts: 1093
Joined: Mon Feb 04, 2008 2:10 pm
Gender: Male
Location: OTF most of the time.
Contact:

Re: Fortification dropdowns (merged) [Done]

Post by Thezzaruz »

A small change that improves playability? I love it!
=D> =D> =D> =D> =D> to all involved.



owenshooter wrote:i'm sorry but it makes far more sense to say, move x number of armies from Y to Z, than to say move Y to Z, x number of armies... if i look at a stack of apples that i want to move to a box. i am going to say, "move 3 apples from the stack, to the box. i'm not going to say, move apples to the box, 3 of them...


It just feels strange because you're not used to it and thus is forming the sentence based on the old system and not on your actual thought process, I think we all can agree that the first choice we make is "from where" and then consider "how many". And this change actually makes it more intuitive now IMO.
And your analogy falters as the numbers box doesn't know how many armies it can move until you have made a choice in the from box. Your suggestion would lead to people having to make a choice in the middle box (from) and then having to retrace their steps to the left box to choose how many, now we just go from left to right.

+ everything that sully said.
User avatar
owenshooter
Posts: 13294
Joined: Wed Mar 07, 2007 6:01 pm
Gender: Male
Location: Deep in the Heart of Tx

Re: Fortification dropdowns (merged) [Done]

Post by owenshooter »

Thezzaruz wrote:A small change that improves playability? I love it!
=D> =D> =D> =D> =D> to all involved.



owenshooter wrote:It just feels strange because you're not used to it and thus is forming the sentence based on the old system and not on your actual thought process, I think we all can agree that the first choice we make is "from where" and then consider "how many". And this change actually makes it more intuitive now IMO.
And your analogy falters as the numbers box doesn't know how many armies it can move until you have made a choice in the from box. Your suggestion would lead to people having to make a choice in the middle box (from) and then having to retrace their steps to the left box to choose how many, now we just go from left to right.

+ everything that sully said.


i'm talking about in the final fortifications phase, not during the attacks.. during the attacks, it is WONDERFUL. when you are making reenfrocements, it is counter intuitive, period. just took another turn, and it is just silly.
you fly through with the new change, and it is great. then you end attacks, and you have to switch the thought process to move your troops around... it just makes zero sense... you now attack and fortify 2 seperate ways in
the same boxes!!! how in the hell is that "better"? it makes no sense. the black jesus has spoken.-0
Image
Thorthoth,"Cloaking one's C&A fetish with moral authority and righteous indignation
makes it ever so much more erotically thrilling"
User avatar
Night Strike
Posts: 8512
Joined: Wed Apr 18, 2007 2:52 pm
Gender: Male

Re: Fortification dropdowns (merged) [Done]

Post by Night Strike »

My guess is that the From Where country is selected first so the number of troops can auto-adjust to what that territory has.

What I'm happy about is that it doesn't appear to have harmed Clicky Maps.
Image
User avatar
kmhebert
Posts: 458
Joined: Tue Jan 23, 2007 1:13 pm
Gender: Male
Location: Brimfield Massachusetts USA
Contact:

Improved Reinforcements

Post by kmhebert »

Hey Try it! You'll like it. No. I don't. Specifically what I do not like is how the default # of armies to fortify is the maximum possible. I would like it to be the minimum possible. I do like how it fixes the illegal fortification issue. But I would like a Game Setting to allow you to set your default to either the min or max # of armies, that should be easy. Heh sometimes improvements are in the eye of the beholder.
Image
User avatar
Tracita
Posts: 87
Joined: Tue Jun 19, 2007 10:03 pm
Location: Arizona

Re: Fortification dropdowns (merged) [Done]

Post by Tracita »

I am trying it (I have no choice) but I do think it is counterintuitive... maybe b/c I am not used to it. The sentence is awkward though.
User avatar
owenshooter
Posts: 13294
Joined: Wed Mar 07, 2007 6:01 pm
Gender: Male
Location: Deep in the Heart of Tx

Re: Fortification dropdowns (merged) [Done]

Post by owenshooter »

Tracita wrote:I am trying it (I have no choice) but I do think it is counterintuitive... maybe b/c I am not used to it. The sentence is awkward though.

amen... i mean, you should attack and forify the same way, right? i can live with the max number for advancing after attack... i just don't like the box switching sides for reenforcements and having to call on the german language structure for it to make sense to me... the black jesus has agreed with tracita...-0
Image
Thorthoth,"Cloaking one's C&A fetish with moral authority and righteous indignation
makes it ever so much more erotically thrilling"
User avatar
Orwell
Posts: 87
Joined: Sat Aug 25, 2007 10:35 pm
Gender: Male

Re: Fortification dropdowns (merged) [Done]

Post by Orwell »

Max forts as default is fine.

Moving the dropdown box was a mistake:
"Reinforce from (A) to (B) (#) troops" is awkward to say the least
whereas
"Reinforce (#) troops from (A) to (B)" is clear.

If a change in the order is important, I suggest:
"(A) sends (#) troops to reinforce (B)"
"Ever tried. Ever failed. No matter. Try again. Fail again. Fail better." - Samuel Beckett, Worstward Ho
moo_biatch
Posts: 5
Joined: Thu Dec 25, 2008 10:09 pm
Location: Noblesvile, Indiana, USA

Re: Fortification dropdowns (merged) [Done]

Post by moo_biatch »

It was moved for flow reasons. If the # box was on the left still, people would select a # of troops, then select the place to take them from and the the # box would reset. That causes an extra step.
User avatar
Orwell
Posts: 87
Joined: Sat Aug 25, 2007 10:35 pm
Gender: Male

Re: Fortificateing Suggestion.

Post by Orwell »

I think most would understand after a few games, and it isint that hard to understand. But a other way of doing it is to set it as Filter on control panel: From Easy Fortifcateing [v] to Moderate For...[x]

An option would be great. Not because the new arrangement is hard understand - but because it is completely illogical.
"Ever tried. Ever failed. No matter. Try again. Fail again. Fail better." - Samuel Beckett, Worstward Ho
User avatar
yeti_c
Posts: 9624
Joined: Thu Jan 04, 2007 9:02 am
Gender: Male

Re: Fortification dropdowns (merged) [Done]

Post by yeti_c »

tobinov wrote:Max forts as default is fine.

Moving the dropdown box was a mistake:
"Reinforce from (A) to (B) (#) troops" is awkward to say the least
whereas
"Reinforce (#) troops from (A) to (B)" is clear.

If a change in the order is important, I suggest:
"(A) sends (#) troops to reinforce (B)"


This one.

C.
Image
Highest score : 2297
User avatar
cougarfoxtrot
Posts: 7
Joined: Sat Feb 10, 2007 8:25 pm

Re: Fortification dropdowns (merged) [Done]

Post by cougarfoxtrot »

Can't stand this change...the logic is counterintuitive
User avatar
owenshooter
Posts: 13294
Joined: Wed Mar 07, 2007 6:01 pm
Gender: Male
Location: Deep in the Heart of Tx

Re: Fortification dropdowns (merged) [Done]

Post by owenshooter »

Thezzaruz wrote:It just feels strange because you're not used to it and thus is forming the sentence based on the old system and not on your actual thought process, I think we all can agree that the first choice we make is "from where" and then consider "how many". And this change actually makes it more intuitive now IMO.

no, it feels strange because it is counter intuitive and illogical. never in my life has my first choice been to thing "from where" and then to consider "how many". it is always "how many" and then "from where". now, if you are german, i will agree with you, just based on the language structure used in deutschland. other than that, no way this is more intuitive. again, as many others have said, it is counter intuitive and just upsets the flow of the game when you switch to fortifying. makes no sense to attack and then re-enforce in 2 seperate ways. zero sense... the black jesus has spoken...-0
Image
Thorthoth,"Cloaking one's C&A fetish with moral authority and righteous indignation
makes it ever so much more erotically thrilling"
Post Reply

Return to “Archived Suggestions”