strokem1257 wrote:I think we need to come up with a list of the scummiest people so far, lynch one of them, I can night kill another and then we can continue on from there. If we are really lucky we may even get two vamps out of the way early in the game. any suggestions guys?
Stroke, be careful with your vig powers. They could hurt us just as much as they can help. I wouldn't kill anyone if I were you unless you had strong suspicions that they were scum.
Skittles! wrote:
captainwalrus wrote:
Skittles! wrote:However, I think I'll be targeted tonight :/
Why?
cause i think i've proved that I can come up with a concise argument enough to convince people to lynch suspects.
I don't think you have anything to worry about, but that's just me. Scum don't normally target the outspoken people. Instead they target the quiet ones who have made no friends or enemies the whole game. It leaves less of a trail to follow.
strokem1257 wrote:I think we need to come up with a list of the scummiest people so far, lynch one of them, I can night kill another and then we can continue on from there. If we are really lucky we may even get two vamps out of the way early in the game. any suggestions guys?
Stroke, be careful with your vig powers. They could hurt us just as much as they can help. I wouldn't kill anyone if I were you unless you had strong suspicions that they were scum.
Skittles! wrote:
captainwalrus wrote:
Skittles! wrote:However, I think I'll be targeted tonight :/
Why?
cause i think i've proved that I can come up with a concise argument enough to convince people to lynch suspects.
I don't think you have anything to worry about, but that's just me. Scum don't normally target the outspoken people. Instead they target the quiet ones who have made no friends or enemies the whole game. It leaves less of a trail to follow.
On the other hand, leaving the quiet people alive could lead to more or less random lynching unless one or more of them finally start talking once the more vocal players are gone.
Gaah! There are too many possibilities!
saxitoxin wrote:Your position is more complex than the federal tax code. As soon as I think I understand it, I find another index of cross-references, exceptions and amendments I have to apply.
Timminz wrote:Yo mama is so classless, she could be a Marxist utopia.
Mm. Interesting. If PMC says it's fixed, then that vote of no lynch means that e_i_pi is a double voter, or we have a secret voter, in which case PMC should say (unknown) or something. But it's still interesting.
KraphtOne wrote:when you sign up a new account one of the check boxes should be "do you want to foe colton24 (it is highly recommended) "
People, people. I don't think you get the idea of 'counter-claiming'. You do not say that you're not going to counter-claim, because if you don't then it's obvious you're not that role. If you have the same role that has been claimed, and can prove it, then please say so. It could get the town a very good lynch.
KraphtOne wrote:when you sign up a new account one of the check boxes should be "do you want to foe colton24 (it is highly recommended) "
naxus wrote:im still a little suspicous of stroke.His claim makes sense but it just seems too good.
What do you mean? Vig is a pretty standard role.
I guess im just being paranoid
We're not playing a dethy game...
saxitoxin wrote:Your position is more complex than the federal tax code. As soon as I think I understand it, I find another index of cross-references, exceptions and amendments I have to apply.
Timminz wrote:Yo mama is so classless, she could be a Marxist utopia.
