high ranking players are treated better than average players

[JoshyBoy]

I am concerned about the mental state of the majority of CC's players.

[the.killing.44]

I respect some High Ranks that have a great Winning Percentage, but when a high rank with 6000 games and 30 percent win ratio talks shit to me, has no right to do so.

And if this hypothetical player plays nothing smaller than 6 player standard games, have they still no rights?

Wait, let me rephrase that. Learn basic math please.

Maybe I should have gone into more detail, there was no need for the rude remark that you posted. Anyway what I meant was that people who play 6000 games or so and win only 30 percent, should not tell a person with a 50 win ratio who plays in team games knows strategy and knows the map how to play.

I guess this guy must suck, then. Ooph, this guy's such a noob!

.44

[biteme143]

I respect some High Ranks that have a great Winning Percentage, but when a high rank with 6000 games and 30 percent win ratio talks shit to me, has no right to do so.

And if this hypothetical player plays nothing smaller than 6 player standard games, have they still no rights?

Wait, let me rephrase that. Learn basic math please.

Maybe I should have gone into more detail, there was no need for the rude remark that you posted. Anyway what I meant was that people who play 6000 games or so and win only 30 percent, should not tell a person with a 50 win ratio who plays in team games knows strategy and knows the map how to play.

I guess this guy must suck, then. Ooph, this guy's such a noob!

.44

Man you guys just keep proving that the OP is correct in its statement. I made that point just to say that ranks don't matter, what matters is the skill, and skill is determined by the way you play the game and the way you use strategy. I did not say that low win ratios suck, I merely said they should think they are better than someone with a low rank and call them nubs. You are just twisting what I am stating, and you are also proving that high levels think to much of themselves hence you. I really don't worry about my rank, thats why I play fun games, and serious games. Some people have lives, we are not all 18 and under worrying about how to get rid of acne. IT IS JUST A GAME NOTHING ELSE.

[biteme143]

I respect some High Ranks that have a great Winning Percentage, but when a high rank with 6000 games and 30 percent win ratio talks shit to me, has no right to do so.

And if this hypothetical player plays nothing smaller than 6 player standard games, have they still no rights?

Wait, let me rephrase that. Learn basic math please.

Maybe I should have gone into more detail, there was no need for the rude remark that you posted. Anyway what I meant was that people who play 6000 games or so and win only 30 percent, should not tell a person with a 50 win ratio who plays in team games knows strategy and knows the map how to play.

I guess this guy must suck, then. Ooph, this guy's such a noob!

.44

.46

[King_Herpes]

Man you guys just keep proving that the OP is correct in its statement. I made that point just to say that ranks don't matter, what matters is the skill, and skill is determined by the way you play the game and the way you use strategy. I did not say that low win ratios suck, I merely said they should think they are better than someone with a low rank and call them nubs. You are just twisting what I am stating, and you are also proving that high levels think to much of themselves hence you. I really don't worry about my rank, thats why I play fun games, and serious games. Some people have lives, we are not all 18 and under worrying about how to get rid of acne. IT IS JUST A GAME NOTHING ELSE.

I think somebody could use a hug.

[Master Fenrir]

Some people have lives, we are not all 18 and under worrying about how to get rid of acne. IT IS JUST A GAME NOTHING ELSE.

All people have lives. Some people choose to spend part of their life, sometimes even a large part of their life, playing games on Conquer Club, because that's what they enjoy. Why you felt the need to make such a judgmental generalization about the members of this site because of something that one individual said is beyond me. I'm 25 and acne-free, but I can still recognize this as the incredibly ignorant comment that it is.

[biteme143]

Some people have lives, we are not all 18 and under worrying about how to get rid of acne. IT IS JUST A GAME NOTHING ELSE.

All people have lives. Some people choose to spend part of their life, sometimes even a large part of their life, playing games on Conquer Club, because that's what they enjoy. Why you felt the need to make such a judgmental generalization about the members of this site because of something that one individual said is beyond me. I'm 25 and acne-free, but I can still recognize this as the incredibly ignorant comment that it is.

Whatever the fact is that the OP is correct, and by me saying more and more I have proven that. My comment was a bit harsh I admit, but the fact is that people who spend the majority of their lives on here have no right to judge how others play. I rest my case, and will not re post on this thread, any insults, rude/sarcastic remarks (by King Herpes), and anything else about my character is not of my concern I am done defending. This thread should have not been taken this far, but high ranks made it into a joke rather just a simple talk between players.

[the.killing.44]

I respect some High Ranks that have a great Winning Percentage, but when a high rank with 6000 games and 30 percent win ratio talks shit to me, has no right to do so.

And if this hypothetical player plays nothing smaller than 6 player standard games, have they still no rights?

Wait, let me rephrase that. Learn basic math please.

Maybe I should have gone into more detail, there was no need for the rude remark that you posted. Anyway what I meant was that people who play 6000 games or so and win only 30 percent, should not tell a person with a 50 win ratio who plays in team games knows strategy and knows the map how to play.

I guess this guy must suck, then. Ooph, this guy's such a noob!

.44

.46

Bite me.

[Mr Changsha]

I respect some High Ranks that have a great Winning Percentage, but when a high rank with 6000 games and 30 percent win ratio talks shit to me, has no right to do so.

And if this hypothetical player plays nothing smaller than 6 player standard games, have they still no rights?

Wait, let me rephrase that. Learn basic math please.

Maybe I should have gone into more detail, there was no need for the rude remark that you posted. Anyway what I meant was that people who play 6000 games or so and win only 30 percent, should not tell a person with a 50 win ratio who plays in team games knows strategy and knows the map how to play.

You seem to know how to play since your ratio is around 48 percent, a decent person who knows risk would have a good ratio. But if you just play all standards and have a win ratio below 30 percent and are a high rank. I that person should not be rude or arrogant to a person who knows strategy due to their knowledge on all game types.

Overall I feel that the high ranks sometimes go to peoples heads, I never ever give anyone advice unless they truly need it. Advice should only be given if asked or if the person is just not understanding the way the game flows. An analogy of high ranks can be applied to politics. People who are high level should just tone down on the rude remarks in games, and only give advice when asked. If a nub is fking up your chance of winning so be it is a game don't get pissed if you wanna tell them how to play ask them if they want to learn otherwise let it be.

This is totally, completely and without a shadow of a doubt, wrong.

Player A plays trips (that'll be you). He should maintain a 50% win rate to be average - assuming he plays teams of relatively equal ability.

Player B plays 5 man multiplayer. He should maintain a 20% win rate to be average. If he can maintain a 40% win rate he'll fly up the scoreboard in no time and be considered a top player.

I honestly can't believe that you haven't worked this out yet since freakin' 2006. What were you thinking?

[Georgerx7di]

Bad players should expect to be discriminated against, they deserve no respect

Damn right froggy. Tell em. : )

[Fruitcake]

Man you guys just keep proving that the OP is correct in its statement. I made that point just to say that ranks don't matter, what matters is the skill, and skill is determined by the way you play the game and the way you use strategy. I did not say that low win ratios suck, I merely said they should think they are better than someone with a low rank and call them nubs. You are just twisting what I am stating, and you are also proving that high levels think to much of themselves hence you. I really don't worry about my rank, thats why I play fun games, and serious games. Some people have lives, we are not all 18 and under worrying about how to get rid of acne. IT IS JUST A GAME NOTHING ELSE.

You just keep proving why Number One people are arrogant, and rude. God if I wasn't anti-violence, I could prolly kick your ***.

Further evidence if it was needed that some uppity lieutenants just don't have the breeding.

[comic boy]

Case A to this OP, King Herpes thinks he is the shit because he is number one. Yeah he has skill, but he also has over 6000 games over him for experience. Maybe if I can get this many games under belt I can be as narcissistic as him?

Wouldn't count on it sugar tits.

You just keep proving why Number One people are arrogant, and rude. God if I wasn't anti-violence, I could prolly kick your ***.

No Im sorry but I must pick you up on on this, I was almost angelic when number one but currently languish in lower echelons and have found myself becoming increasingly more arrogant and rude by the day , your proposition is not sound

[demonfork]

Dude I play assassin on my free time, I have a team that I play with in triples. So I know strategy and plus not that this matters, I have been on this site since pretty much around when this site opened up. You assumed to much by looking at my game logs. I have been playing with the same triples team for a while we play around 4 to 5 games at a time I allowed to play other games, and I enjoy the rush of Doodle earth assassin oh and also I don't care about points im here for fun not to be on some virtual number one board.

Sounds made up.

Case A to this OP, King Herpes thinks he is the shit because he is number one. Yeah he has skill, but he also has over 4500 games over him for experience. Maybe if I can get this many games under belt I can be the shit also? Anyway I am done hopefully arguing this topic.

If you haven't figured it out by now I doubt that you would after 4500 games, more than likely after forty five hundo you'd still be a cook staring in through the window...



But when grandpa when, I want to be general more than any of them

[chipv]

Man you guys just keep proving that the OP is correct in its statement. I made that point just to say that ranks don't matter, what matters is the skill, and skill is determined by the way you play the game and the way you use strategy. I did not say that low win ratios suck, I merely said they should think they are better than someone with a low rank and call them nubs. You are just twisting what I am stating, and you are also proving that high levels think to much of themselves hence you. I really don't worry about my rank, thats why I play fun games, and serious games. Some people have lives, we are not all 18 and under worrying about how to get rid of acne. IT IS JUST A GAME NOTHING ELSE.

You just keep proving why Number One people are arrogant, and rude. God if I wasn't anti-violence, I could prolly kick your ***.

Further evidence if it was needed that some uppity lieutenants just don't have the breeding.

I am just wondering why you are wasting so much port-swilling time torturing these poor fellows.
I recommend a nice 1997 Fonseca - depends on your taste, I much prefer ruby to tawny.

[Fruitcake]

Man you guys just keep proving that the OP is correct in its statement. I made that point just to say that ranks don't matter, what matters is the skill, and skill is determined by the way you play the game and the way you use strategy. I did not say that low win ratios suck, I merely said they should think they are better than someone with a low rank and call them nubs. You are just twisting what I am stating, and you are also proving that high levels think to much of themselves hence you. I really don't worry about my rank, thats why I play fun games, and serious games. Some people have lives, we are not all 18 and under worrying about how to get rid of acne. IT IS JUST A GAME NOTHING ELSE.

You just keep proving why Number One people are arrogant, and rude. God if I wasn't anti-violence, I could prolly kick your ***.

Further evidence if it was needed that some uppity lieutenants just don't have the breeding.

I am just wondering why you are wasting so much port-swilling time torturing these poor fellows.
I recommend a nice 1997 Fonseca - depends on your taste, I much prefer ruby to tawny.

'97 was a good year. '85 was a tad better and easier to drink by the bottle.