Simply due to lurking, I'm going to go ahead and vote Fuzzy Penguin. No real reason other than this, but if we're at a loss as to who looks suspicious now, it seems time to do the (roughly) random vote thing
I'm somewhat confused about Falko's night action, I was under the impression that Falko had two attempts to nightkill someone for the whole game, and that he already used both.
So what night action was it?
saxitoxin wrote:Your position is more complex than the federal tax code. As soon as I think I understand it, I find another index of cross-references, exceptions and amendments I have to apply.
Timminz wrote:Yo mama is so classless, she could be a Marxist utopia.
MeDeFe wrote:I'm somewhat confused about Falko's night action, I was under the impression that Falko had two attempts to nightkill someone for the whole game, and that he already used both.
So what night action was it?
I think we are all confused about falko's role. Language barriers suck.
MeDeFe wrote:I'm somewhat confused about Falko's night action, I was under the impression that Falko had two attempts to nightkill someone for the whole game, and that he already used both.
So what night action was it?
I have a killing ability each night...and eventually, and only once in the game i can use two attemps of killing..I guess that it's because there is some evil faction characters that needs two shoots to be killed. Last night i was'n able to use any shoot. and the deaths are already well explained...so, we have to look who is the "new" vampire, because the vzmpireness it's trasmited by bitting I guess.
If you have further question about my role, don't hesitate to ask me.
MeDeFe wrote:I'm somewhat confused about Falko's night action, I was under the impression that Falko had two attempts to nightkill someone for the whole game, and that he already used both.
So what night action was it?
I have a killing ability each night...and eventually, and only once in the game i can use two attemps of killing..I guess that it's because there is some evil faction characters that needs two shoots to be killed. Last night i was'n able to use any shoot. and the deaths are already well explained...so, we have to look who is the "new" vampire, because the vzmpireness it's trasmited by bitting I guess.
If you have further question about my role, don't hesitate to ask me.
@squirrel. I don't like your doc-fishing.
So you have one shot every night, and on one night in the game you have two shots, and you need an additional vote to be lynched. I have already figured that pmc like complicated roles, but even so that seems awfully overpowered.
saxitoxin wrote:Your position is more complex than the federal tax code. As soon as I think I understand it, I find another index of cross-references, exceptions and amendments I have to apply.
Timminz wrote:Yo mama is so classless, she could be a Marxist utopia.
Hey all - got my prod from PMC earlier today. Sorry for holding things up - I was busy with an extra job that I took on and graduation; but now that I'm all settled in and have my degree I should be active again. Give me until tomorrow and I'll read back through everything recently and post up.
Gilligan wrote:I'M SO GOOD AT THIS GAME My stepmom locked the bathroom door So I opened the lock with my shoelace
Because I can more easily imagine a vampire that needs an additional vote to be lynched than a vigilante with one doubleshot who needs an additional vote to be lynched, and also to get this thing bumped up to the top and maybe lure in a person or two with a new post.
saxitoxin wrote:Your position is more complex than the federal tax code. As soon as I think I understand it, I find another index of cross-references, exceptions and amendments I have to apply.
Timminz wrote:Yo mama is so classless, she could be a Marxist utopia.
Ok - I've reread back since Day 2, and one person seems to have stood out for some reason. At first, GEQ had a few different posts, asking questions, etc...and voted for what seemed to be good choices. Then, he had his post simply stating "Vote CW" (before PMC made the move saying that he would kill someone if we didn't), and was quickly asked on what grounds he was voting for him on (back on August 17). We all know CW turned out to be good, so I find it odd he didn't even try to explain his actions before the furious bandwagon started to kill before a random.org kill. After that post, his only other post is one voting for Mr. Squirrel (on September 11). A rather odd action that MeDeFe, Mr. Squirrel, and e_i_pi all quickly pointed out...yet it's been another 12 days since his peculiar vote and we haven't heard a peep from him.
For now, I'm going to vote GEQ for his last two votes and lack of reasoning for said votes.
Gilligan wrote:I'M SO GOOD AT THIS GAME My stepmom locked the bathroom door So I opened the lock with my shoelace
The Fuzzy Pengui wrote:A rather odd action that MeDeFe, Mr. Squirrel, and e_i_pi all quickly pointed out...yet it's been another 12 days since his peculiar vote and we haven't heard a peep from him.
Still struggling with exetel to get the internet on at my place (I just moved house - well 4 weeks ago). I have internet at work, and at my mums place, but when I log on it's mostly to take turns that are running low and that's it - deadbeating in the Clan League rates higher than checking a mafia game (sorry guys hehe).
Since you've turned up and contributed to discussion I'll happily remove the vote
saxitoxin wrote:Your position is more complex than the federal tax code. As soon as I think I understand it, I find another index of cross-references, exceptions and amendments I have to apply.
Timminz wrote:Yo mama is so classless, she could be a Marxist utopia.
Hello i'm here now. Totally forgot about this and wasn't prodded so totally forgot. Anyways, i don't see what made me vote for squirrely earlier, but i am severely questioning the sobriety of myself at that current time I'm gonna go ahead and unvote
cowboyz wrote:read more and still confused...someone smarter than me make a case to lynch someone
The problem is we don't have much of a case, though drunkenness is an almost too convenient explanation for a weird vote. But then again... it happens. Fuzzy's line of reasoning also makes sense, but can we trust Fuzzy?
Damn this is hard, did anyone investigate someone who didn't die?
saxitoxin wrote:Your position is more complex than the federal tax code. As soon as I think I understand it, I find another index of cross-references, exceptions and amendments I have to apply.
Timminz wrote:Yo mama is so classless, she could be a Marxist utopia.
We need to get this moving again. Reading back a little, I came upon crazy's accusations of pi. When I first read these (back on day 3) I thought crazy had very little basing for his accusations and we shouldn't worry about pi. However with the night scene showing the death of crazy by a serial killer, I'm starting to reconsider pi's innocence.
Normally, I hardly ever consider a politician or a double voter scum simply because it gives the scum an unfair advantage. However, since we are clearly dealing with a serial killer here, I think it is possible for him to be a double voter as well. Plus, his half-block claim is less than a little suspicious. It is a claim that we cannot prove right or wrong (since we don't know exactly how it works) and we already had someone else claim roleblocker. I don't know why I didn't notice this before. vote e i pi
Starting tomorrow I'll probably be gone for a week or so, please don't kill me, pmc.
saxitoxin wrote:Your position is more complex than the federal tax code. As soon as I think I understand it, I find another index of cross-references, exceptions and amendments I have to apply.
Timminz wrote:Yo mama is so classless, she could be a Marxist utopia.