2 Person Play?
Moderator: Community Team
Forum rules
Please read the community guidelines before posting.
Please read the community guidelines before posting.
- KoolBak
- Posts: 7414
- Joined: Fri Feb 03, 2006 1:03 pm
- Gender: Male
- Location: The beautiful Pacific Northwest
2 Person Play?
Twill / Lack...will there ever be a 2 person option like in the board game? Sure make it easier for a real time game.....nominal points but something new...thanks-
- Blitzkreig
- Posts: 78
- Joined: Thu Mar 02, 2006 5:54 pm
- Location: Flanking your decrepit forces
- KoolBak
- Posts: 7414
- Joined: Fri Feb 03, 2006 1:03 pm
- Gender: Male
- Location: The beautiful Pacific Northwest
whats the diff between 2 multis and 3? Big diff if my dad and I want to play a quick game......
I do not view CC as a place to cringe from cheaters but a place to maximize our enjoyment while dealing with douchebags the best we can......and learning wacicha's enchantment dances so I too can love the dice......
I do not view CC as a place to cringe from cheaters but a place to maximize our enjoyment while dealing with douchebags the best we can......and learning wacicha's enchantment dances so I too can love the dice......
"Gypsy told my fortune...she said that nothin showed...."
Neil Young....Like An Inca
AND:
Neil Young....Like An Inca
AND:
riskllama wrote:Koolbak wins this thread.
- KoolBak
- Posts: 7414
- Joined: Fri Feb 03, 2006 1:03 pm
- Gender: Male
- Location: The beautiful Pacific Northwest
Repeat: whats the difference between cheating in 2 person or 3 person????????? The fact that you get LESS points?????
Anyway, Twill....hoping for a response so I can delete the original post...many thanks-
Anyway, Twill....hoping for a response so I can delete the original post...many thanks-
"Gypsy told my fortune...she said that nothin showed...."
Neil Young....Like An Inca
AND:
Neil Young....Like An Inca
AND:
riskllama wrote:Koolbak wins this thread.
KoolBak wrote:Repeat: whats the difference between cheating in 2 person or 3 person????????? The fact that you get LESS points?????
Anyway, Twill....hoping for a response so I can delete the original post...many thanks-
Lets say I am a multi. I set 2 player games and play with myself (hey this is PG). I keep doing that until I am rated #1. There is no 3rd party to see this "easy way to the top".
THE DEBATE IS OVER...
JESUS SAVES!!!
PLAYER57832 wrote:Too many of those who claim they don't believe global warming are really "end-timer" Christians.
JESUS SAVES!!!
- KoolBak
- Posts: 7414
- Joined: Fri Feb 03, 2006 1:03 pm
- Gender: Male
- Location: The beautiful Pacific Northwest
[sarcasm] Jay....thanks for spelling it out for me [/sarcasm].
REPEAT AGAIN: If you are a multi (multi means > 1, not 2), you can just as easily set up THREE OR MORE accounts and be doing that RIGHT NOW and get there faster as you get to take points from 2, 3, 4 or 5 players (as my darling wicked points out above).
WHATS THE DIFF????????????????????????????????????????
Wacicha....I would love to play you in 2 person.....as originally pointed out and confirmed above, realtime games would be much easier....this is about the play, not the points.
REPEAT AGAIN: If you are a multi (multi means > 1, not 2), you can just as easily set up THREE OR MORE accounts and be doing that RIGHT NOW and get there faster as you get to take points from 2, 3, 4 or 5 players (as my darling wicked points out above).
WHATS THE DIFF????????????????????????????????????????
Wacicha....I would love to play you in 2 person.....as originally pointed out and confirmed above, realtime games would be much easier....this is about the play, not the points.
"Gypsy told my fortune...she said that nothin showed...."
Neil Young....Like An Inca
AND:
Neil Young....Like An Inca
AND:
riskllama wrote:Koolbak wins this thread.
- areyouincahoots
- Posts: 1794
- Joined: Wed Mar 15, 2006 5:34 pm
- Gender: Female
- Location: Arkansas
jay_a2j wrote:KoolBak wrote:Repeat: whats the difference between cheating in 2 person or 3 person????????? The fact that you get LESS points?????
Anyway, Twill....hoping for a response so I can delete the original post...many thanks-
Lets say I am a multi. I set 2 player games and play with myself (hey this is PG). I keep doing that until I am rated #1. There is no 3rd party to see this "easy way to the top".
What, am I talking to myself? 2 player game won't work. If you want a real-time game set one up. How hard can it be...lets see Tuesday June 6, 2006 at 6:00pm EST hmmmm sign up and play!
THE DEBATE IS OVER...
JESUS SAVES!!!
PLAYER57832 wrote:Too many of those who claim they don't believe global warming are really "end-timer" Christians.
JESUS SAVES!!!
KoolBak wrote:[sarcasm] Jay....thanks for spelling it out for me [/sarcasm].
REPEAT AGAIN: If you are a multi (multi means > 1, not 2), you can just as easily set up THREE OR MORE accounts and be doing that RIGHT NOW and get there faster as you get to take points from 2, 3, 4 or 5 players (as my darling wicked points out above).
WHATS THE DIFF????????????????????????????????????????
Wacicha....I would love to play you in 2 person.....as originally pointed out and confirmed above, realtime games would be much easier....this is about the play, not the points.
If someone sets up a 6 player game and plays solo to get points...first off they have no life. A two player game would be quicker. But go ahead make a 2 player option ...you just won't see me in any.
Oh if you want a real-time game buy Risk. I'd like to see this game revamped to play like Axis & Allies myself.
THE DEBATE IS OVER...
JESUS SAVES!!!
PLAYER57832 wrote:Too many of those who claim they don't believe global warming are really "end-timer" Christians.
JESUS SAVES!!!
I don't know jay =-= you got a major a couple of sargents and lt's i think a capt to saying they would like this they been around awhile they would know what they like and you do not know how many realtime hames i have joined about 30 and only one really ended up being real time and most of those in that game have posted in this post. So it might work for some of us old dogs(refering to Koolbak AND mysely as old cahoots not you)!!

no one said u had to play....just theres alot of other people that would...i have no life so i would like a realtime game i dont have to set up 1-2-5 days in advance....and if me and someone else would like to play right then and now we can. and not wait for the 5 days to pass befor someone act. signs up for it....by then im over it....SO I THINK IT SHOULD HAPPEN..
GREAT IDEA!!!!!!!!
GREAT IDEA!!!!!!!!
sorry for being slow on the reply guys...
on the cheating side of it, most multis who use a system like this to boost their score will usually have only 2 accounts and team up on a 3rd, higher ranked player...you can only get so many points once you milk your alt down to 700 points. So on the cheating side of things, it's not THAT big of a change, but of course, would make it more tempting to create an alt...to put it in anti-drug-activist, it would be a gateway game, drawing unsuspecting newbies into the seedy underbelly that is multi-dom and then having them branch out once they already have them, then having us bust them for the bottom-dwelling scum that they are (no disprespect intended...of course
)
As for coding, I dont see why this would be a problem except for other priorities which are on the to-do list right now. Lack would have to code the random neutral player, but that probably wouldnt be too hard, (but I can't speack Lack's coding time) but would just be something else to get in the way of other things which might be more useful.
aaaaaaaaand, this should have gone in the suggestion forum probably, as that's what it really is once you get down to it
so, in other words, it's a resounding "maybe"
Might I suggest starting a poll in the suggestion board seeing how many people would want this/think it's a bad idea.
Twill
on the cheating side of it, most multis who use a system like this to boost their score will usually have only 2 accounts and team up on a 3rd, higher ranked player...you can only get so many points once you milk your alt down to 700 points. So on the cheating side of things, it's not THAT big of a change, but of course, would make it more tempting to create an alt...to put it in anti-drug-activist, it would be a gateway game, drawing unsuspecting newbies into the seedy underbelly that is multi-dom and then having them branch out once they already have them, then having us bust them for the bottom-dwelling scum that they are (no disprespect intended...of course
As for coding, I dont see why this would be a problem except for other priorities which are on the to-do list right now. Lack would have to code the random neutral player, but that probably wouldnt be too hard, (but I can't speack Lack's coding time) but would just be something else to get in the way of other things which might be more useful.
aaaaaaaaand, this should have gone in the suggestion forum probably, as that's what it really is once you get down to it
so, in other words, it's a resounding "maybe"
Might I suggest starting a poll in the suggestion board seeing how many people would want this/think it's a bad idea.
Twill
- Banana Stomper
- Posts: 422
- Joined: Thu Mar 16, 2006 4:39 pm
- Location: Richmond, Virginia
- Contact:
- KoolBak
- Posts: 7414
- Joined: Fri Feb 03, 2006 1:03 pm
- Gender: Male
- Location: The beautiful Pacific Northwest
My thanks to you TASR...I know you are very busy.......it is appreciated! Someone else start the thread please...I dont like being the target of ridicule (unless it's wicked or scorba...then I like it!). [/wimp out]
Thanks!
Thanks!
"Gypsy told my fortune...she said that nothin showed...."
Neil Young....Like An Inca
AND:
Neil Young....Like An Inca
AND:
riskllama wrote:Koolbak wins this thread.
10-0 United States 2/5/07